
Photograph by Jamie Chung | Prop Styling by Bryan Byrn
<< a diagnostic search engine >>
In theory, the more doctors learn about the body, the better basis they have for figuring out what's wrong with you. In reality, they can't keep up with the flood of new information. In neurology alone, the number of identified disorders has more than doubled in 10 years, to more than 1,800, the majority extremely rare. True, doctors as a community know more, but what any individual knows constitutes a smaller portion of medical information overall. What if physicians could use technology to tap their peers' expertise to make quicker, more accurate diagnoses?
Dr. Michael Segal, 54, a renowned pediatric neurologist in Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, has been working on this problem off and on for 20 years. The result: SimulConsult, a sophisticated online crowd-sourcing tool for identifying neurological disorders that demonstrates the potential of the Web to transform the way all kinds of diseases are diagnosed. Doctors enter a patient's symptoms and test results, and the software produces likely diagnoses and the probability for each.
"It's like having a group of more- experienced physicians helping with every diagnosis," says Dr. Viveck Baluja, a resident in pediatric neurology and developmental medicine and a fellow at Baltimore's Kennedy Krieger Institute. "The people inputting data about the diseases are experts in this field."
Segal recognized the need for such a tool as a resident in the 1980s, when he spent hours poring through books and looking at every possible unusual disease for one particularly perplexing patient. "The problem is that textbooks are arranged so if you know the disease, they tell you the symptoms or lab results," he says. "But patients come to us in the opposite way, with findings that we need to put together in a story to reach a diagnosis."
SimulConsult works the way a physician does. It produces an initial diagnosis based on information from experts with a wealth of experience, then prompts the doctor to consider other pertinent tests and findings. For example, if a physician enters information about a teenager with a history of attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder, an abnormal electrocardiogram, and bouts of weakness, SimulConsult asks about recent salt intake. "Most clinicians would not flag such information as relevant," says Segal, but sodium has been known to trigger those symptoms in patients with a neurological syndrome known as hypokalemic periodic paralysis. Says Baluja: "There are thousands of outliers. The problem isn't in the disease itself. It's in the subtle variations of disease. The details matter."
In 1997, Segal went part-time at Harvard Medical School, where he had been an award-winning researcher, to found SimulConsult. The firm didn't begin generating revenue until this year; the tool was more of a puzzle he wanted to solve than a way to make money. Last year, in hopes of expanding, he hired a CEO, got his first ads, and secured an initial round of funding from an angel investor; eventually, he plans to charge a subscription fee for access to more detailed information. "This is typical of a lot of medical innovations," says David Williams, a health-care consultant in Boston and informal adviser to Segal. "There's a long incubation from basic R&D to commercialized product."
Segal began by offering the database free to pediatric neurologists. Now primary-care physicians make up 20% of users, a development that should increase its impact. If SimulConsult helps generalists make correct diagnoses early on, that means fewer visits to the wrong specialists and unnecessary tests, greatly reducing costs and accelerating appropriate treatment.
Most significantly, more users would lead to more findings and a richer, more valuable diagnostic tool. "I think we will discover that many diseases that we thought were rare," says Segal, "will turn out to have been just rarely recognized."
It's this ability to expand and harness knowledge that makes cutting-edge information technology such a powerful driver of the emerging health-care revolution. Professional tools like SimulConsult, Isabel, and Diagnosaurus can improve care and control costs. Sites such as PatientsLikeMe, which connects people with similar conditions, help them understand their health and may promote compliance with treatment. Physicians, not surprisingly, complain about patients who try to diagnose themselves after logging onto the symptom search engine Medgle. But the end result is to deepen communication, both among doctors and between physicians and their patients. Everyone will be smarter for it.
Recent Comments | 17 Total
April 16, 2009 at 10:25am by Jim Jones
Added to EHRLinks.com
April 17, 2009 at 11:32pm by Bruce Brown
Telemedicine is the way of the future -- cheap and fast. If you live in NY check out www.swiftmd.com!
April 20, 2009 at 1:52am by David Wagoner
True the platform is important, but more important is the willingness of physicians and patients to change the system. The transformation comes from technology applied to meet real needs. Read more at: http://www.healdeal.com/blog/?p=33
April 21, 2009 at 3:52pm by Rob Lightner
This is exciting stuff! I've been using HealthVault ( http://www.healthvault.com/Personal/index.html ) for a while and I think this is finally enabling us to take control of our healthcare in the same way we have more control over our finances, real estate decisions, etc. It's good to see positive change instead of inertia.
April 25, 2009 at 11:13am by STEVEN TUCKER
I love the concept and have been doing e-medicine now for 10 years but remain skeptical about long term and universal success. The problems are both massive (the presumption that care should be free and universal) and minute (addressing protectionist laws about e-health prescribing and practicing across state lines or countries). Also, the solution described perpetuates and confirms the status quo without addressing fundamental change in personal responsibility for health and wellness. I worry that these models only become virtual urgent care clinics without support or vision for prevention. @drsteventucker
April 30, 2009 at 3:14pm by Joel DeJong
The Hello Health model brings convenience and affordability to primary
care via the internet without sacrificing the doctor patient
relationship. It also provides an alternative to general insurance
coverage which is currently costing my family of four over $800/month.
Being self-employed, I need alternatives. With Parkinson's model I
would be able to pay for affordable care when I need it and get
catastrophic coverage for under $200/month. Thank you Jay for
bringing primary care into the 21st Century.
April 30, 2009 at 3:17pm by Joel DeJong
Great Article! The Hello Health model brings convenience and affordability to primarycare via the internet without sacrificing the doctor patient relationship. It also provides an alternative to general insurance coverage which is currently costing my family of four over $800/month. Being self-employed, I need alternatives. With Parkinson's model I would be able to pay for affordable care when I need it and get
catastrophic coverage for around $200/month. Thank you Jay for
bringing primary care into the 21st Century.
May 3, 2009 at 1:21pm by Helen K
This service only offers a decent alternative for the healthcare needs of affluent young people. If the trend catches on and competition drives costs down for this type of health care service, maybe this will become more affordable for more people.
It drives away the insurance hassle for doctors and patients alike but it preserves the same philosophy of insurers. The doctors help most those who need help least, and getting rich thereby. So it's basically just another bloodthirsty vampire scheme, hardly the innovative solution we need in the national healthcare crisis we are experiencing today.
May 8, 2009 at 1:05am by House Doc
Technology by itself is no panacea. It could make things more complicated and difficult if not used properly. Health vault, for example, would be pretty useless if its packed with hundreds of pages of irrelevant details, as is the case with hospital records nowadays. Technology can help make the system more efficient, however, as for example, using the on line service www.housedoc.us to communicate with the doctor by email instead of by phone.
May 8, 2009 at 1:05am by House Doc
Technology by itself is no panacea. It could make things more complicated and difficult if not used properly. Health vault, for example, would be pretty useless if its packed with hundreds of pages of irrelevant details, as is the case with hospital records nowadays. Technology can help make the system more efficient, however, as for example, using the on line service www.housedoc.us to communicate with the doctor by email instead of by phone.
July 13, 2009 at 3:19pm by Ken Fyre
More doctors are circumventing the entire health care system and coming up innovative business models to help their practice. Gone is the sole reliance on insurance based business models where patients are herding in the door and herded out like cattle. Does doctors who do house calls or those with flat-rate pricing often are paid directly by their clients and hence the doctors practice more preventive medicine.
Doctor Reviews
September 29, 2009 at 3:08pm by Jack Bronson
Thanks for an amazing article. It is really a big issue nowadays in the United States. Maybe, after Obama’s health care reform, things will get better. For example, just few weeks ago I was trying to pass some medical tests at the local hospital, but when I saw prices, it was a real shock for me. More than a half thousand dollars for simple procedures. It is not a good at all.
Those ideas about e-hospitals look very interesting. I would be pleased to have a conversation with my doctor through the internet. Moreover, I would have a chance to look through my test results or diagnoses any time I want to. In conclusion, I want to say that this article presents some really great solutions for our health care system, so I want to thank one more time to the author.
Sincerely,
Jack Slighton from no prescription pharmacy
September 29, 2009 at 3:10pm by Jack Bronson
Thanks for an amazing article. It is really a big issue nowadays in the United States. Maybe, after Obama’s health care reform, things will get better. For example, just few weeks ago I was trying to pass some medical tests at the local hospital, but when I saw prices, it was a real shock for me. More than a half thousand dollars for simple procedures. It is not a good at all.
Those ideas about e-hospitals look very interesting. I would be pleased to have a conversation with my doctor through the internet. Moreover, I would have a chance to look through my test results or diagnoses any time I want to. In conclusion, I want to say that this article presents some really great solutions for our health care system, so I want to thank one more time to the author.
Sincerely,
Jack Slighton from no prescription pharmacy
September 30, 2009 at 1:25pm by Marry Lohlin
Sometimes it looks like that everyone is complaining about health care problems now, but I don't see any problem here. Yes, we are paying a lot for our health, but I don't agree that the quality of our health care system is poor. I would say that it is the best in the whole world. I am traveling a lot, I was in Europe, South America, Asia, and I didn't see any hospital which would have such a high quality of medicine as we have. They sometimes lack simple vaccination or simple things that are the MUST for health care problems nowadays. So the conclusion is that we want to pay less money for better health care? It sounds like the Utopian idea. But we will wait and see what Obama's health care reform will provide us. Good luck to everyone and thanks for the great and interesting article!
Marry Lohlin from letrozole
November 3, 2009 at 9:47am by Andrew Eriksen
@mary I agree with you, our healthcare system overall is actually great. I know that if I was to get sick, I can actually trust my doctors to make good decisions on behalf of my health. The confidence I have in the competency of our doctors is worth a lot of money. There are many things that can be fixed but an overall at the proposed scale is just not logical at this time for our country. We should take a history lesson and look back at other government ventures of this magnitude. They were always on the heels of economic woes and always far exceeded the initial estimates. I think that we need to slow down and take our time to create a comprehensive healthcare reform package that will solve many problems. The proposed plan is a patch work plan only designed to mend the system and satisfy the desire of the administration to pass healthcare reform.
--
Andrew Eriksen, CEO
Physician Practice Management Services
http://freeEMRsolution.com EMR Reviews & Free Solutions
http://PhysicianCredentialingServices.com Practice Start Up Assistance
November 5, 2009 at 2:04pm by Eric Sandler
This is the future of medicine.
To Quit Smoking | Stroke Treatment | Online Cricket Games
November 22, 2009 at 1:46pm by Benetta Anthony
Nice post I Like your site very well and continue to do so. I have bookmarked your site.