RSS

Print

Myspace, the Sequel

By: Ellen McGirtThu Aug 7, 2008 at 7:30 PM
Chris DeWolfe (left) and Tom Anderson"Social Network" is so 2005. MySpace Cofounders Chris DeWolfe (left) and Tom Anderson are calling their site a "social portal". | photo by Jill Greenberg
With Facebook surging, cofounders Chris DeWolfe and Tom Anderson have gone back to their roots -- music, pop culture, and a proven cash-flow ad model -- to spur a next phase of growth. Will that be enough for boss Rupert Murdoch?

EnlargeAmit KapurChief operations officer Amit Kapur came aboard MySpace three years ago as the "first business-development guy." | photo by Jill Greenberg
EnlargeTechnology Chief Aber WhitcombTechnology Chief Aber Whitcomb | photo by Jill Greenberg

Related Content


Chris Dewolfe, the lanky, shaggily hip CEO of Myspace, is holding his last meeting of the day from a prone position, a collection of long limbs stacked on a tiny red love seat. The early evening powwow, taking place in the cramped office of his senior communications director, is interrupted when I come crashing in to say good-bye.

DeWolfe can be forgiven for putting his feet up. Along with cofounder and MySpace president Tom Anderson, he has lived through a lot of long days lately -- about four-and-a-half years' worth since the site first launched. In fact, a slight defensiveness hangs in the air here about the site's age. Not that it is too old, but rather that it is younger than most Web watchers seem to remember. Everyone I talk to at MySpace HQ in Los Angeles, from DeWolfe and Anderson on down, mentions the four-and-a-half-year figure, as if to remind me that their biz is only a month older than their chief social-networking competition, the upstart some 350 miles to the north, Facebook.

It's understandable that the MySpace folks would feel a little slighted by all the attention Facebook has been getting. It was MySpace, after all, that grabbed headlines in 2005 when Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. acquired it for $580 million. It was MySpace that proved social networking could be a mass medium, attracting 10 million users, then 20 million, then 50 million -- prompting Murdoch to crow about its "meteoric rise" -- back when Facebook was still a college-focused niche player. Yet over the past year and a half, Facebook has quickly gained traction and fans, its fresh-faced CEO piling up TV appearances and magazine covers (including Fast Company's in May 2007). Suddenly, Facebook's worldwide user base surpassed MySpace's in size. Then on June 30, MySpace's financial reputation was dinged when Fox Interactive Media (FIM), the News Corp. division that houses the site (along with Photobucket, Fox Sports Interactive, and other properties), closed out its fiscal year without hitting its revenue target.

I visited the next day, but the MySpace management team wasn't talking about numbers. It certainly wasn't talking about Facebook. Instead, DeWolfe, Anderson, and four other senior staffers -- including chief technology officer Aber Whitcomb, hired by DeWolfe "nine years and four companies ago" (he built the original MySpace site in 30 days) and 27-year-old chief operating officer Amit Kapur -- spun out a vision of unwavering ambition and optimism. Hey, did we mention that we're profitable? And that we have 115 million monthly visitors worldwide? That we're outpacing Gmail and Hotmail in messages sent? And giving YouTube a run for its money in video downloads?

During my rounds at the offices -- which will be traded in next June for a new 300,000-square-foot FIM facility in Playa del Rey, which the company claims is the biggest real-estate transaction in L.A. in 25 years -- the crew opened up about the pros and cons of working for Murdoch. They also laid out a dizzying array of new initiatives, from an imminent site redesign to major marketing alliances with big-name brands. They practically strutted about an unprecedented new foray into the music business, set to be rolled out in early fall, and revealed that MySpace is no longer a social network at all, but -- wait for it -- a "social portal": a global, content-rich hub with a social component. The MySpacers weren't shy about touting the advantages they feel they have over Silicon Valley stars such as Google and Apple. They weren't shy about much of anything, actually (except their own ages, which DeWolfe and Anderson wouldn't confess). In their view, they have come farther, faster than almost anyone these days gives them credit for. In many ways, they are right.

Several hours before DeWolfe's collapse on the love seat, I sit down for lunch with him and Anderson in a sunny corner conference room. Anderson arrives late and inhales a steaming tin of cheesy Mexican goodness before beginning to speak; DeWolfe picks at a salad, then abandons it to better connect and chat. He is an easy talker, radiating an "I've been everywhere, man" vibe in the best sense -- cool, calm, with a low center of gravity. It seems odd, sitting with them, that Anderson is the more famous of the two. He is everyone's first "friend" upon joining MySpace and has become the de facto face of customer service, routinely alerting users to changes and problems through his MySpace blog. He's also a formidable pollster: When he asks members for feedback, he has been known to get some 20,000 responses -- in under 10 minutes. Anderson has 237,991,950 friends on MySpace as of my visit; DeWolfe has barely 200. "I keep a lower profile," DeWolfe says simply.

From Issue 128 | September 2008


Sign in or register to comment.
or

Recent Comments | 8 Total

August 25, 2008 at 9:18pm by voter2008

Hello,

A friend of mine has created a very interesting video. It has inspired me vote in the upcoming election, and if you aren't already going to, I am sure it will for you too.

You can find the video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4kg514DcTA

I would love to hear what you think about it after you watch it. Thank you for your time.

August 27, 2008 at 10:23am by Heather Mansfield

August 27, 2008 at 10:49am by Heather Mansfield

Hi,

I have built a business using MySpace to help nonprofit organizations... and I love the chaos, the freedom, the ability to get on there and market an idea, a cause, etc.

I run:
http://www.myspace.com/nonprofitorganizations

The nicest, most generous people on there.

I like Facebook for different reasons... to connect with people I know.

I have given countless webinars and presentations all over the country about how nonprofits can use MySpace and Facebook. I've never once heard a MySpacer slam a Facebooker... they're just chill.

Facebookers on the other hand, I can't believe the way they talk about MySpacers. Even the nonprofit folks. I find it so frustrating. I hate the MySpace vs. Facebook thing. The sites couldn't more different in purpose, yet there is this inclination to choose one or the other... use both! MySpace just gets ripped in the press too (a bunch of Facebookers, I am sure... journalists and press in their 30-40's that can't handle MySpace, and find the neat, clean, linear whiteness of Facebook much more in their comfort zone... Mashable is the worst.).

I like the diversity on MySpace... the democracy of it... Facebook has rules, rules, rules and more rules... there's very little diversity in class or race. People need to talk about this more.

Facebook does very little for social good, and MySpace has Impact, Impact Awards, A Place for Impact... and they get no press for it.

Also, what no one is saying in the media... the rush of traffic in recent months is the nonprofits, businesses, bands, etc. promoting fan pages... they are sending out millions of emails saying "Hey, visit our new Facebook fan page!".

Anyway, some people use MySpace, some people use Facebook, some people use both for different reasons. There is space on the Web for both!

Glad to see you wrote a story about them!

August 27, 2008 at 11:29am by Rene Paige

September 6, 2008 at 12:54pm by Johannes Bhakdi

MySpace & Co have never taken their users seriously - meaning: their ability to generate high quality content. As long as they do not focus on the (monetary) value of their content, they will never realize their monetary potential.

Sell your content on Klatcher

October 10, 2008 at 4:13pm by Justanother Usefulcomment

Myspace is cool, has its pro's and con's along with everything else which is man made. However Tom's Statement in regards to iTunes and Apple not being a "media" company... Tom what are you thinking, are you blind? Apple makes great hardware which supports media, some of the best A/V application for creating and rendering graphix, to DJ'ing and Vj'ing and sample recording, are power by Apple MAC OS X... WTF are you talking about Tom... A side from not being able to partake in business with business men, you should stay away from being interviewed... because you are just plain DUBM!

October 10, 2008 at 4:13pm by Justanother Usefulcomment

Myspace is cool, has its pro's and con's along with everything else which is man made. However Tom's Statement in regards to iTunes and Apple not being a "media" company... Tom what are you thinking, are you blind? Apple makes great hardware which supports media, some of the best A/V application for creating and rendering graphix, to DJ'ing and Vj'ing and sample recording, are power by Apple MAC OS X... WTF are you talking about Tom... A side from not being able to partake in business with business men, you should stay away from being interviewed... because you are just plain DUBM!

November 15, 2008 at 3:13am by Eugene Osei

I think it just depeds on what your online to actually do.I would recommend facebook myself but I use myspace more