Goodwin admits all these things are true but believes the country could be weaned off gasoline in a three-step process. The first would be for Detroit to aggressively roll out diesel engines, much as Europe has already begun to do (some 50% of all European cars run diesel). In a single stroke, that would improve the nation's mileage by as much as 40%, and, because diesel fuel is already widely available, drivers could take that step with a minimum of disruption. What's more, given that many diesel engines can also run homegrown biodiesel, a mass conversion to diesel would help kick-start that market. (This could have geopolitical implications as well as environmental and economic ones: The Department of Transportation estimated in 2004 that if we converted merely one-third of America's passenger cars and light trucks to diesel, we'd reduce our oil consumption by up to 1.4 million barrels of oil per day--precisely the amount we import from Saudi Arabia.)
The second step in Goodwin's scheme would be to produce diesel-electric hybrid cars. This would double the mileage on even the biggest diesel vehicles. The third phase would be to produce electric hybrids that run in "dual fuel" mode, burning biodiesel along with hydrogen, ethanol, natural gas, or propane. This is the concept Goodwin is proving out in his turbine-enhanced H3 Hummer and in Neil Young's Lincoln: "At that point, your mileage just goes really, really high, and your emissions are incredibly low," he says. Since those vehicles can run on regular diesel or biodiesel--and without any alternative fuel at all, if need be--drivers wouldn't have to worry about getting stranded on the interstate. At the same time, as more and more dual-fuel cars hit the road, they would goose demand for genuinely national ethanol, hydrogen, and biodiesel grids.
For Goodwin, navigating this process is all about imagination and adaptability. "The point is to design cars that are flexible," he says. "You'll see a change in how vehicles are fueled in the future. Which fuel source will be the exclusive one or the one that'll take over the petroleum base is, you know, anybody's guess, so it's like the wild, wild West of fuel technology right now. I think it'll be a combination between a few different fuels. I know hydrogen will definitely come around."
Imagination and vision, of course, are often rewarded. As global pressure increases on the United States to reduce our carbon emissions, those rewards are likely to get juicier. Under some versions of legislation being considered in Congress, for example, companies voluntarily deploying superefficient vehicles in large fleets could be awarded substantial offsets. Take DHL, the FedEx rival: Goodwin says his company, SAE Energy, is negotiating with the shipper to convert 800 of its vehicles to dual fuel. "We could get them an offset of something like 70 cents a gallon," Goodwin says, "and reduce their cost of fuel by 50%."
Industry insiders and observers agree with many of Goodwin's prescriptions, particularly his concept of fuel flexibility. "We have to have alternatives," says Beau Boeckmann, vice president of California's Galpin Motors, the largest Ford dealership in the country, who recently partnered with Goodwin to convert a 2008 F450 truck to hydrogen and biodiesel. "Only with a combination of things can we get alternative fuels off the ground." Boeckmann believes hydrogen is the true "silver bullet" for ending greenhouse gases but thinks it'll take more than a decade to figure out how to create and distribute it cheaply. Mary Beth Stanek, GM's director of environment, energy, and safety policy, also agrees with the multifuel approach--and points out that this is precisely how Brazil weaned itself from regular gasoline. "They pull up to the pump, and they've got a whole bunch of different choices," she notes. She, too, predicts diesel will make a comeback because of its inherent fuel efficiency: "You will see more vehicles going back to diesel over a lot of different lines."
Yet in reality, American carmakers seem conspicuously slow on the uptake. Stanek is about as ardent a fan of alternative fuels as you're likely to find inside GM, but even she admits no one there is seriously thinking of abandoning the gasoline engine anytime soon. The 300-million-gallon U.S. biodiesel business is a fraction of the 12-billion-gallon ethanol one. And Detroit is extremely cautious about what the market can bear.
Recent Comments | 74 Total
February 12, 2008 at 2:23pm by Amber Walker
Is this guy married?
February 25, 2008 at 8:03am by Matt Cooke
Read the text Amber, he plans on converting his WIFE's car!
This guy is a visionary for sure, a true messiah in a world inhabited by sheep. The automobile is dead, long live the automobile!
March 17, 2008 at 6:31pm by Arthur Hawley
Highly recommended read and to consider, since fuel prices are only going to continue to rise!
March 18, 2008 at 2:20am by Sridhar Oruganti
Way to go.
Guys like Johnathan deserve a pat on the back and BUY their tech
March 18, 2008 at 2:21am by Sridhar Oruganti
Way to go.
Guys like Johnathan deserve a pat on the back and BUY the tech
March 18, 2008 at 2:22am by Sridhar Oruganti
Way to go.
Guys like Johnathan deserve a pat on the back and helped in every way
April 9, 2008 at 11:10am by Mike Cardy
A fool and his money...
You can pick the true from the false pretty easily. Will a Turbine burn Diesel, sure. (Clean?) Can you reduce a 1960 Lincoln's emissions 80%? Of course, put a converter on it. Or something smaller than a big block with a pre-emissions carb. Ever try to drive up to Burger King and ask for 20 Gallons of used grease? Great line. Hope you aren't taking a trip somewhere. Like a drive 60 miles and back. Or a long weekend in the mountains. How's that stuff flow in the Indiana winter?
Sure, electric motors have great torque at all RPM, but when was the last time you saw a 1960's turbine cold start to full power and shut down in seconds. How long did it live? Was it clean and efficient? Driving a generator to fill supercapacitorbatteries, I assume he means some capacitors to dump into an electric motor for a few seconds of drag race.
100 MPG? Under what parameters? Off the top of his head, "I'll do 100".
It works great to sell to rock stars, sports stars, and other multi-million dollar folks with maybe a GED. Or bankers with no mechanical knowledge.
Riding the eco-wave with great marketing buzzwords, and making money. That's the smart part.
April 30, 2008 at 8:27pm by
Mike C apparently can't read: Goodwin's not dreaming this stuff: he's already DOING it! His vehicles CAN run on waste veggie oil, OR you can drive up to a pump and put in diesel. Yeah, your last line might have been a concession that Goodwin's got something going on, but the gist of your post was doubt in something that's already working. Not bright.
If one man can produce cars of this sort, and he is, then GM and other companies can and should produce them. Think about their economies of scale; they CAN make these vehicles, and make them affordable to the average citizen. It's about time they pulled their heads out and DID so!
May 5, 2008 at 5:27am by Michael Lavoie
It appears to me this man is nothing short of a genius. Mike C is obiviously playing devil's advocate, which is fine of course, but the problems he pointed out could easily be solved by like minded professionals provided this technology goes mainstream. The real problem it seems and was pointed out in the article is the non availiability of the alternate fuels. Auto makers don't want to produce the vehicles because the biodesiel, ethanol, and hydrogen aren't widely availiable to the public masses. Without the fuels being widely availiable the public won't buy the vehicles. So the real question is, how do you introduce both simultaneously? Regardless, I give kudos to John and his incredible ideas. It incredible and exactly what this country needs during this critical time and if nothing is done soon, the problems will continue to spiral out of control. How long before we as a people are outraged by the energy crisis? When is enough enough? When the cost of fuel reaches $5.00 a gallon? How about $6.00? Families are having to decide between food or fuel. The technology is there; we need to make this happen.
May 29, 2008 at 4:24pm by Bill Reid
GM says that this can't be done. GM says that battery technology needs to catch up to build a successful electric car. They are fools or liars. Altairnano (ALTI) has the batteries, 100 miles per charge, recharge in 8 min., 250,000 miles over all driving equivalent.
June 9, 2008 at 10:32pm by Sean Carter
Detroit is a *dinosaur*. Ford, GM, whatever- the problem is that once any company reaches a certain size, the accountants take over from the engineers, and from that point on the focus is on suppressing competition rather than accepting any kind of change to the way they do business. The music industry is another example of this phenomenon. Are you listening, accountants? You are the problem! Raawr!
June 11, 2008 at 9:31am by Johnny Grisdale
This is addressing Sean Carter's comment below. Accountants are the problem? What business are you in, where accountants are calling the shots and working to suppress competition? Detroit is dying & the big 3 are dinosaurs, you're correct about that. The changes they are making now are way too little and probably too late, but the problem starts in the boardroom and the C-suite, not with the accountants.
June 18, 2008 at 3:00am by Ron Howard
Mike Cardy is DEAD RIGHT!,there is nothing to be gained with Hybrid vehicles except a feel good response from those with the bucks willing to replace a $10,000 lithium battery every 5 years.
And why waste timew and energy on a big ugly inefficient military truck?.Does this guy have a small penis or is he familiar with the old saw well known by con artists that the biggest con is always the easiest to pull off?
And has thr journ responsible ever stood close to a turbine engines exhaust?,has he or any of the cheer squad ever wondered why Chrysler and Rover in the UK abandoned turbine engines in the 60's. That exahuast comes out at several hundred degrees folks,check out a turbo prop aircraft taxing sometime and look at the heat waves comming off.Imagine a car....can you say " global warming" ??
Nothing is ever new under the sun.
June 18, 2008 at 10:19pm by Stuart Janssen
Actually, Chrysler stopped the turbine project because while the 63 model produces almost no pollutants, it did produce nitrogen oxide, though they fixed that problem in the 70s, not because the engines ran really hot. I don't know if you've noticed, but exhaust from your average internal combustion engine is pretty hot because the engines are powered by explosions. And even if the turbines did run exceptionally hot, the fact is that the engine he's using will only run in short bursts to charge the other drive train.
August 5, 2008 at 7:44pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:47pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 7, 2008 at 7:52pm by Bruce Zanetta
November 9, 2008 at 8:19am by david anderson
If this guy and his claims are for real, there is no good reason why GM and Ford aren't getting with the program! The diesel engines obviously run on diesel - if he can couple it with an electric motor that can either charge itself or run purely on electric power at high efficiencies the only thing that matters are the MPG and the pricing for the vehicle. Not to mention this guy is cobbling these vehicles together out of off the shelf parts- I find it hard to believe Detroit isn't all over this - like last week!! Of course, American automakers have a shady history when threatened by outside innovation - just google the name Tucker.
November 11, 2008 at 4:31am by Josef Heath
Even I thought that was impossible. I wouldn't believe it till I see it. I bet he'll just put an additional auto engine part to it.
December 10, 2008 at 4:16pm by Aaron C
I like what this guy is doing - and would love to see it continue - but at some point the States are going to have to let the Feds take the lead in setting the rules for fuel and emissions... otherwise guys like this will be arrested for tampering with emissions equipment.
March 3, 2009 at 5:14pm by Kristina Kittle
Looks like some pretty neat stuff.
April 2, 2009 at 9:28pm by petty deh
he's too bright =) i like him.
July 16, 2009 at 5:24am by Steve Howard
I run my Mercedes and Nissan on WASTE veggie oil and have done so for some time. Lots of people do this. We have lots of diesel cars coming on the market today and hybrid electric cars. There are lots of company doing diesel fumigation. What Johnathan is doing is great stuff but he is far from the innovator implied in this article, just search the web. Plant oils are a great fuel alternative but we need great caution or we will fuel our cars and starve the poor. Johnathan keep up the great work but please be reported accurately for the good of all not just you. peace and blessings Howie
July 31, 2009 at 8:19am by Michael Sanders
Hopefully, Mr. Goodwin is smart enough to document his research notes, drawings, etc. in multiple formats (photos, audio/visual, printed, etc.) and to distribute same to anybody and everybody. Let's see the government keep his inventions hidden when 100,000 people have evidence of his work, and they share it with their friends, family, relatives, coworkers, local media outlets, social networking sites, etc. Eventually, truth will be exposed, much to our government's disgust and subsequent denial. Then, the powerless will become the powerful.
August 14, 2009 at 3:45pm by viko Johns
Thanks for help, you do a great job. buy essay
August 21, 2009 at 6:21am by John Davidson
This data is fascinating and well worth using. But this is only a piece of the overall puzzle. Both "Influentials" and "Accidental Influentials" exist and both have to be taken into account. No two campaigns should be exactly the same. And good old fashioned intuition is fantastic as well and adds passion and creativity to the process. But trusting your intuition to the point of ignoring all other factors is self-righteous and stupid. The same goes for data and statistics. The key is looking at all of them and using all the data available. People at the extreme ends of this debate will never do as well as the ones that take valuable data from both sides instead of arguing who was more right. The truth is in what works. So both sides have some truth. And I intend to use both to my advantage.