One engineer turned and said, "GM said this wouldn't work."
"Well," Goodwin replied, "here it is."
Goodwin's feats of engineering have become gradually more visible over the past year. Last summer, Imperium Renewables contacted MTV's show Pimp My Ride about creating an Earth Day special in which Goodwin would convert a muscle car to run on biodiesel. The show chose a '65 Chevy Impala, and when the conversion was done, he'd doubled its mileage to 25 mpg and increased its pull from 250 to 800 horsepower. As a stunt, MTV drag-raced the Impala against a Lamborghini on California's Pomona Raceway. "The Impala blew the Lamborghini away," says Kevin Kluemper, the lead calibration engineer for GM's Allison transmission unit, who'd flown down to help with the conversion. Schwarzenegger, who was on the set that day, asked Goodwin on the spot to convert his Wagoneer to biodiesel.
Observers of Goodwin's work say his skill lies in an uncanny ability to visualize a mechanical system in precise detail, long before he picks up a wrench. (Goodwin says he does much of his mental work during long drives.) "He has talent unknown to any mortal," says Mad Mike, Pimp My Ride's host. "He has this ability to see things so exactly, and I still don't know how he does it."
For his part, Goodwin argues he's merely "a problem solver. Most people try to make things more complicated than they are." He speaks of the major carmakers with a sort of mild disdain: If he can piece together cleaner vehicles out of existing GM parts and a bit of hot-rod elbow grease, why can't they bake that kind of ingenuity into their production lines? Prod him enough on the subject and his mellowness peels away, revealing a guy fired by an almost manic frustration. "Everybody should be driving a plug-in vehicle right now," he complains, in one of his laconic engineering lectures, as we wander through the blistering Kansas heat to a nearby Mexican restaurant. "I can go next door to Ace Hardware and buy a DC electric motor, go out to my four-wheel-drive truck, remove the transmission and engine, bolt the electric motor onto the back of the transfer case, put a series of lead-acid batteries up to 240 volts in the back of the bed, and we're good to go. I guarantee you I could drive all around town and do whatever I need, go home at night, and hook up a couple of battery chargers, plug one into an outlet, and be good to go the next day.
"Detroit could do all this stuff overnight if it wanted to," he adds.
In reality, Goodwin's work has begun to influence some of Detroit's top auto designers, but through curious and circuitous routes. In 2005, Tom Holm, the founder of EcoTrek, a nonprofit that promotes the use of alternative fuels, heard about Goodwin through the Hummer-junkie grapevine and hired him. When Holm showed GM the vehicles Goodwin converted, the company was duly impressed. Internally, Hummer executives had long been looking for a way to blunt criticism of the H2's gas-guzzling tendencies and saw Goodwin's vehicles as an object lesson in what was possible. So GM decided to flip the switch: It announced the same year that, beginning in 2008, it would convert its gasoline Hummers to run on ethanol; by 2010, it said, Hummers would be biodiesel-compatible.
"It was an influence," concedes Hummer general manager Martin Walsh, of the EcoTrek vehicles. "We wanted to be environmentally responsible by having engines in Hummers that run on renewable fuels." But until I contacted Hummer for this story, GM didn't know that the man behind those machines was none other than Goodwin.
GM's commitment is a start, however halting. Overall, though, Detroit still seems to be all but paralyzed by the challenges of fuel economy, emissions, and alternative fuels. And it's not just about greed or laziness: Talk to car-industry experts, and they'll point out a number of serious barriers to introducing radically new alternative-fuel vehicles on a scale that will make a difference. One of the highest is that low-emission fuels--biodiesel, ethanol, electricity, hydrogen, all of which account for less than 3% of the nation's fuel supply--just aren't widely available on American highways. This creates a chicken-and-egg problem. People won't buy alternative-fuel cars until it's easy to fill them up, but alternative fuel makers won't ramp up production until there's a viable market.
Recent Comments | 74 Total
February 12, 2008 at 2:23pm by Amber Walker
Is this guy married?
February 25, 2008 at 8:03am by Matt Cooke
Read the text Amber, he plans on converting his WIFE's car!
This guy is a visionary for sure, a true messiah in a world inhabited by sheep. The automobile is dead, long live the automobile!
March 17, 2008 at 6:31pm by Arthur Hawley
Highly recommended read and to consider, since fuel prices are only going to continue to rise!
March 18, 2008 at 2:20am by Sridhar Oruganti
Way to go.
Guys like Johnathan deserve a pat on the back and BUY their tech
March 18, 2008 at 2:21am by Sridhar Oruganti
Way to go.
Guys like Johnathan deserve a pat on the back and BUY the tech
March 18, 2008 at 2:22am by Sridhar Oruganti
Way to go.
Guys like Johnathan deserve a pat on the back and helped in every way
April 9, 2008 at 11:10am by Mike Cardy
A fool and his money...
You can pick the true from the false pretty easily. Will a Turbine burn Diesel, sure. (Clean?) Can you reduce a 1960 Lincoln's emissions 80%? Of course, put a converter on it. Or something smaller than a big block with a pre-emissions carb. Ever try to drive up to Burger King and ask for 20 Gallons of used grease? Great line. Hope you aren't taking a trip somewhere. Like a drive 60 miles and back. Or a long weekend in the mountains. How's that stuff flow in the Indiana winter?
Sure, electric motors have great torque at all RPM, but when was the last time you saw a 1960's turbine cold start to full power and shut down in seconds. How long did it live? Was it clean and efficient? Driving a generator to fill supercapacitorbatteries, I assume he means some capacitors to dump into an electric motor for a few seconds of drag race.
100 MPG? Under what parameters? Off the top of his head, "I'll do 100".
It works great to sell to rock stars, sports stars, and other multi-million dollar folks with maybe a GED. Or bankers with no mechanical knowledge.
Riding the eco-wave with great marketing buzzwords, and making money. That's the smart part.
April 30, 2008 at 8:27pm by
Mike C apparently can't read: Goodwin's not dreaming this stuff: he's already DOING it! His vehicles CAN run on waste veggie oil, OR you can drive up to a pump and put in diesel. Yeah, your last line might have been a concession that Goodwin's got something going on, but the gist of your post was doubt in something that's already working. Not bright.
If one man can produce cars of this sort, and he is, then GM and other companies can and should produce them. Think about their economies of scale; they CAN make these vehicles, and make them affordable to the average citizen. It's about time they pulled their heads out and DID so!
May 5, 2008 at 5:27am by Michael Lavoie
It appears to me this man is nothing short of a genius. Mike C is obiviously playing devil's advocate, which is fine of course, but the problems he pointed out could easily be solved by like minded professionals provided this technology goes mainstream. The real problem it seems and was pointed out in the article is the non availiability of the alternate fuels. Auto makers don't want to produce the vehicles because the biodesiel, ethanol, and hydrogen aren't widely availiable to the public masses. Without the fuels being widely availiable the public won't buy the vehicles. So the real question is, how do you introduce both simultaneously? Regardless, I give kudos to John and his incredible ideas. It incredible and exactly what this country needs during this critical time and if nothing is done soon, the problems will continue to spiral out of control. How long before we as a people are outraged by the energy crisis? When is enough enough? When the cost of fuel reaches $5.00 a gallon? How about $6.00? Families are having to decide between food or fuel. The technology is there; we need to make this happen.
May 29, 2008 at 4:24pm by Bill Reid
GM says that this can't be done. GM says that battery technology needs to catch up to build a successful electric car. They are fools or liars. Altairnano (ALTI) has the batteries, 100 miles per charge, recharge in 8 min., 250,000 miles over all driving equivalent.
June 9, 2008 at 10:32pm by Sean Carter
Detroit is a *dinosaur*. Ford, GM, whatever- the problem is that once any company reaches a certain size, the accountants take over from the engineers, and from that point on the focus is on suppressing competition rather than accepting any kind of change to the way they do business. The music industry is another example of this phenomenon. Are you listening, accountants? You are the problem! Raawr!
June 11, 2008 at 9:31am by Johnny Grisdale
This is addressing Sean Carter's comment below. Accountants are the problem? What business are you in, where accountants are calling the shots and working to suppress competition? Detroit is dying & the big 3 are dinosaurs, you're correct about that. The changes they are making now are way too little and probably too late, but the problem starts in the boardroom and the C-suite, not with the accountants.
June 18, 2008 at 3:00am by Ron Howard
Mike Cardy is DEAD RIGHT!,there is nothing to be gained with Hybrid vehicles except a feel good response from those with the bucks willing to replace a $10,000 lithium battery every 5 years.
And why waste timew and energy on a big ugly inefficient military truck?.Does this guy have a small penis or is he familiar with the old saw well known by con artists that the biggest con is always the easiest to pull off?
And has thr journ responsible ever stood close to a turbine engines exhaust?,has he or any of the cheer squad ever wondered why Chrysler and Rover in the UK abandoned turbine engines in the 60's. That exahuast comes out at several hundred degrees folks,check out a turbo prop aircraft taxing sometime and look at the heat waves comming off.Imagine a car....can you say " global warming" ??
Nothing is ever new under the sun.
June 18, 2008 at 10:19pm by Stuart Janssen
Actually, Chrysler stopped the turbine project because while the 63 model produces almost no pollutants, it did produce nitrogen oxide, though they fixed that problem in the 70s, not because the engines ran really hot. I don't know if you've noticed, but exhaust from your average internal combustion engine is pretty hot because the engines are powered by explosions. And even if the turbines did run exceptionally hot, the fact is that the engine he's using will only run in short bursts to charge the other drive train.
August 5, 2008 at 7:44pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:47pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 7, 2008 at 7:52pm by Bruce Zanetta
November 9, 2008 at 8:19am by david anderson
If this guy and his claims are for real, there is no good reason why GM and Ford aren't getting with the program! The diesel engines obviously run on diesel - if he can couple it with an electric motor that can either charge itself or run purely on electric power at high efficiencies the only thing that matters are the MPG and the pricing for the vehicle. Not to mention this guy is cobbling these vehicles together out of off the shelf parts- I find it hard to believe Detroit isn't all over this - like last week!! Of course, American automakers have a shady history when threatened by outside innovation - just google the name Tucker.
November 11, 2008 at 4:31am by Josef Heath
Even I thought that was impossible. I wouldn't believe it till I see it. I bet he'll just put an additional auto engine part to it.
December 10, 2008 at 4:16pm by Aaron C
I like what this guy is doing - and would love to see it continue - but at some point the States are going to have to let the Feds take the lead in setting the rules for fuel and emissions... otherwise guys like this will be arrested for tampering with emissions equipment.
March 3, 2009 at 5:14pm by Kristina Kittle
Looks like some pretty neat stuff.
April 2, 2009 at 9:28pm by petty deh
he's too bright =) i like him.
July 16, 2009 at 5:24am by Steve Howard
I run my Mercedes and Nissan on WASTE veggie oil and have done so for some time. Lots of people do this. We have lots of diesel cars coming on the market today and hybrid electric cars. There are lots of company doing diesel fumigation. What Johnathan is doing is great stuff but he is far from the innovator implied in this article, just search the web. Plant oils are a great fuel alternative but we need great caution or we will fuel our cars and starve the poor. Johnathan keep up the great work but please be reported accurately for the good of all not just you. peace and blessings Howie
July 31, 2009 at 8:19am by Michael Sanders
Hopefully, Mr. Goodwin is smart enough to document his research notes, drawings, etc. in multiple formats (photos, audio/visual, printed, etc.) and to distribute same to anybody and everybody. Let's see the government keep his inventions hidden when 100,000 people have evidence of his work, and they share it with their friends, family, relatives, coworkers, local media outlets, social networking sites, etc. Eventually, truth will be exposed, much to our government's disgust and subsequent denial. Then, the powerless will become the powerful.
August 14, 2009 at 3:45pm by viko Johns
Thanks for help, you do a great job. buy essay
August 21, 2009 at 6:21am by John Davidson
This data is fascinating and well worth using. But this is only a piece of the overall puzzle. Both "Influentials" and "Accidental Influentials" exist and both have to be taken into account. No two campaigns should be exactly the same. And good old fashioned intuition is fantastic as well and adds passion and creativity to the process. But trusting your intuition to the point of ignoring all other factors is self-righteous and stupid. The same goes for data and statistics. The key is looking at all of them and using all the data available. People at the extreme ends of this debate will never do as well as the ones that take valuable data from both sides instead of arguing who was more right. The truth is in what works. So both sides have some truth. And I intend to use both to my advantage.