RSS

Motorhead Messiah

By: Clive ThompsonWed Dec 19, 2007 at 8:24 AM
Motorhead Messiah

Johnathan Goodwin can get 100 mpg out of a Lincoln Continental, cut emissions by 80%, and double the horsepower. Does the car business have the guts to follow him?

EnlargeMotorhead Messiah


EnlargeMotorhead Messiah


* Related Stories

"Think about it," Goodwin laughs. "A 5,000-pound vehicle that gets 60 miles to the gallon and will do zero to 60 in five seconds!"

Putting a diesel engine in the Hummer, however, required Goodwin to crack GM's antitheft system, which makes it a pain to swap out the engine. In that system, the engine communicates electronically with the body, fuel supply, and ignition; if you don't have all the original components, the car won't start. Goodwin jerry-rigged a set of cables to trick the engine into believing the starter system had broken, sending it into "fail-safe mode"--a backdoor mechanism installed at the factory. (At one point in his story, Goodwin wanders over to a battered cardboard box in the corner of the garage and hauls out an octopuslike tangle of wires--"the MacGyver," his hacking device. "I could have sold this for a lot of money on eBay," he chuckles.)

Once he'd picked the car's lock, Goodwin installed the Duramax and a five-speed Allison--the required transmission for a Duramax, which also helps give it race-car-like control and a rapid take off. After five days' worth of work, the Hummer was getting about 18 mpg--double the factory 9 mpg--and twice the original horsepower. He drove it over to a local restaurant and mooched some discarded oil from its deep fryer, strained the oil through a pair of jeans, and poured it into the engine. It ran perfectly.

But Goodwin wanted more. While researching alternative fuels, he learned about the work of Uli Kruger, a German who has spent decades in Australia exploring techniques for blending fuels that normally don't mix. One of Kruger's systems induces hydrogen into the air intake of a diesel engine, producing a cascade of emissions-reducing and mileage-boosting effects. The hydrogen, ignited by the diesel combustion, burns extremely clean, producing only water as a by-product. It also displaces up to 50% of the diesel needed to fuel the car, effectively doubling the diesel's mileage and cutting emissions by at least half. Better yet, the water produced from the hydrogen combustion cools down the engine, so the diesel combustion generates fewer particulates--and thus fewer nitrogen-oxide emissions.

"You can feed it hydrogen, diesel, biodiesel, corn oil--pretty much anything but water."

"It's really a fantastic chain reaction, all these good things happening at once," Kruger tells me. He has also successfully introduced natural gas--a ubiquitous and generally cheap fuel--into a diesel-burning engine, which likewise doubles the mileage while slashing emissions. In another system, he uses heat from the diesel engine to vaporize ethanol to the point where it can be injected into the diesel combustion chambers as a booster, with similar emissions-cutting effects.

Goodwin began building on Kruger's model. In 2005, he set to work adapting his own H1 Hummer to burn a combination of hydrogen and biodiesel. He installed a Duramax in the Hummer and plopped a carbon-fiber tank of supercompressed hydrogen into the bed. The results were impressive: A single tank of hydrogen lasted for 700 miles and cut the diesel consumption in half. It also doubled the horsepower. "It reduces your carbon footprint by a huge, huge amount, but you still get all the power of the Duramax," he says, slapping the H1 on the quarter panel. "And you can feed it hydrogen, diesel, biodiesel, corn oil--pretty much anything but water."

Two years ago, Goodwin got a rare chance to show off his tricks to some of the car industry's most prominent engineers. He tells me the story: He was driving a converted H2 to the SEMA show, the nation's biggest annual specialty automotive confab, and stopped en route at a Denver hotel. When he woke up in the morning, there were 20 people standing around his Hummer. Did I run over somebody? he wondered. As it turned out, they were engineers for GM, the Hummer's manufacturer. They noticed that Goodwin's H2 looked modified. "Does it have a diesel engine in it?"

"Yeah," he said.

"No way," they replied.

He opened the hood, "and they're just all in and out and around the valves and checking it out," he says. They asked to hear it run, sending a stab of fear through Goodwin. He'd filled it up with grease from a Chinese restaurant the day before and was worried that the cold morning might have solidified the fuel. But it started up on the first try and ran so quietly that at first they didn't believe it was really on. "When you start a diesel engine up on vegetable oil," Goodwin says, "you turn the key, and you hear nothing. Because of the lubricating power of the oil, it's just so smooth. Whisper quiet. And they're like, 'Is it running? Yeah, you can hear the fan going.'"

From Issue 120 | November 2007

Sign in or register to comment.
or

Recent Comments | 74 Total

February 12, 2008 at 2:23pm by Amber Walker

Is this guy married?

February 25, 2008 at 8:03am by Matt Cooke

Read the text Amber, he plans on converting his WIFE's car!
This guy is a visionary for sure, a true messiah in a world inhabited by sheep. The automobile is dead, long live the automobile!

March 17, 2008 at 6:31pm by Arthur Hawley

Highly recommended read and to consider, since fuel prices are only going to continue to rise!

March 18, 2008 at 2:20am by Sridhar Oruganti

Way to go.
Guys like Johnathan deserve a pat on the back and BUY their tech

March 18, 2008 at 2:21am by Sridhar Oruganti

Way to go.
Guys like Johnathan deserve a pat on the back and BUY the tech

March 18, 2008 at 2:22am by Sridhar Oruganti

Way to go.
Guys like Johnathan deserve a pat on the back and helped in every way

April 9, 2008 at 11:10am by Mike Cardy

A fool and his money...

You can pick the true from the false pretty easily. Will a Turbine burn Diesel, sure. (Clean?) Can you reduce a 1960 Lincoln's emissions 80%? Of course, put a converter on it. Or something smaller than a big block with a pre-emissions carb. Ever try to drive up to Burger King and ask for 20 Gallons of used grease? Great line. Hope you aren't taking a trip somewhere. Like a drive 60 miles and back. Or a long weekend in the mountains. How's that stuff flow in the Indiana winter?

Sure, electric motors have great torque at all RPM, but when was the last time you saw a 1960's turbine cold start to full power and shut down in seconds. How long did it live? Was it clean and efficient? Driving a generator to fill supercapacitorbatteries, I assume he means some capacitors to dump into an electric motor for a few seconds of drag race.

100 MPG? Under what parameters? Off the top of his head, "I'll do 100".

It works great to sell to rock stars, sports stars, and other multi-million dollar folks with maybe a GED. Or bankers with no mechanical knowledge.

Riding the eco-wave with great marketing buzzwords, and making money. That's the smart part.

April 30, 2008 at 8:27pm by

Mike C apparently can't read: Goodwin's not dreaming this stuff: he's already DOING it! His vehicles CAN run on waste veggie oil, OR you can drive up to a pump and put in diesel. Yeah, your last line might have been a concession that Goodwin's got something going on, but the gist of your post was doubt in something that's already working. Not bright.

If one man can produce cars of this sort, and he is, then GM and other companies can and should produce them. Think about their economies of scale; they CAN make these vehicles, and make them affordable to the average citizen. It's about time they pulled their heads out and DID so!

May 5, 2008 at 5:27am by Michael Lavoie

It appears to me this man is nothing short of a genius. Mike C is obiviously playing devil's advocate, which is fine of course, but the problems he pointed out could easily be solved by like minded professionals provided this technology goes mainstream. The real problem it seems and was pointed out in the article is the non availiability of the alternate fuels. Auto makers don't want to produce the vehicles because the biodesiel, ethanol, and hydrogen aren't widely availiable to the public masses. Without the fuels being widely availiable the public won't buy the vehicles. So the real question is, how do you introduce both simultaneously? Regardless, I give kudos to John and his incredible ideas. It incredible and exactly what this country needs during this critical time and if nothing is done soon, the problems will continue to spiral out of control. How long before we as a people are outraged by the energy crisis? When is enough enough? When the cost of fuel reaches $5.00 a gallon? How about $6.00? Families are having to decide between food or fuel. The technology is there; we need to make this happen.

May 29, 2008 at 4:24pm by Bill Reid

GM says that this can't be done. GM says that battery technology needs to catch up to build a successful electric car. They are fools or liars. Altairnano (ALTI) has the batteries, 100 miles per charge, recharge in 8 min., 250,000 miles over all driving equivalent.

June 9, 2008 at 10:32pm by Sean Carter

Detroit is a *dinosaur*. Ford, GM, whatever- the problem is that once any company reaches a certain size, the accountants take over from the engineers, and from that point on the focus is on suppressing competition rather than accepting any kind of change to the way they do business. The music industry is another example of this phenomenon. Are you listening, accountants? You are the problem! Raawr!

June 11, 2008 at 9:31am by Johnny Grisdale

This is addressing Sean Carter's comment below. Accountants are the problem? What business are you in, where accountants are calling the shots and working to suppress competition? Detroit is dying & the big 3 are dinosaurs, you're correct about that. The changes they are making now are way too little and probably too late, but the problem starts in the boardroom and the C-suite, not with the accountants.

June 18, 2008 at 3:00am by Ron Howard

Mike Cardy is DEAD RIGHT!,there is nothing to be gained with Hybrid vehicles except a feel good response from those with the bucks willing to replace a $10,000 lithium battery every 5 years.
And why waste timew and energy on a big ugly inefficient military truck?.Does this guy have a small penis or is he familiar with the old saw well known by con artists that the biggest con is always the easiest to pull off?
And has thr journ responsible ever stood close to a turbine engines exhaust?,has he or any of the cheer squad ever wondered why Chrysler and Rover in the UK abandoned turbine engines in the 60's. That exahuast comes out at several hundred degrees folks,check out a turbo prop aircraft taxing sometime and look at the heat waves comming off.Imagine a car....can you say " global warming" ??
Nothing is ever new under the sun.

June 18, 2008 at 10:19pm by Stuart Janssen

Actually, Chrysler stopped the turbine project because while the 63 model produces almost no pollutants, it did produce nitrogen oxide, though they fixed that problem in the 70s, not because the engines ran really hot. I don't know if you've noticed, but exhaust from your average internal combustion engine is pretty hot because the engines are powered by explosions. And even if the turbines did run exceptionally hot, the fact is that the engine he's using will only run in short bursts to charge the other drive train.

August 5, 2008 at 7:44pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:47pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow

August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow

August 7, 2008 at 7:52pm by Bruce Zanetta

November 9, 2008 at 8:19am by david anderson

If this guy and his claims are for real, there is no good reason why GM and Ford aren't getting with the program! The diesel engines obviously run on diesel - if he can couple it with an electric motor that can either charge itself or run purely on electric power at high efficiencies the only thing that matters are the MPG and the pricing for the vehicle. Not to mention this guy is cobbling these vehicles together out of off the shelf parts- I find it hard to believe Detroit isn't all over this - like last week!! Of course, American automakers have a shady history when threatened by outside innovation - just google the name Tucker.

November 11, 2008 at 4:31am by Josef Heath

Even I thought that was impossible. I wouldn't believe it till I see it. I bet he'll just put an additional auto engine part to it.

December 10, 2008 at 4:16pm by Aaron C

I like what this guy is doing - and would love to see it continue - but at some point the States are going to have to let the Feds take the lead in setting the rules for fuel and emissions... otherwise guys like this will be arrested for tampering with emissions equipment.

March 3, 2009 at 5:14pm by Kristina Kittle

Looks like some pretty neat stuff.

April 2, 2009 at 9:28pm by petty deh

he's too bright =) i like him.

July 16, 2009 at 5:24am by Steve Howard

I run my Mercedes and Nissan on WASTE veggie oil and have done so for some time. Lots of people do this. We have lots of diesel cars coming on the market today and hybrid electric cars. There are lots of company doing diesel fumigation. What Johnathan is doing is great stuff but he is far from the innovator implied in this article, just search the web. Plant oils are a great fuel alternative but we need great caution or we will fuel our cars and starve the poor. Johnathan keep up the great work but please be reported accurately for the good of all not just you. peace and blessings Howie

July 31, 2009 at 8:19am by Michael Sanders

Hopefully, Mr. Goodwin is smart enough to document his research notes, drawings, etc. in multiple formats (photos, audio/visual, printed, etc.) and to distribute same to anybody and everybody. Let's see the government keep his inventions hidden when 100,000 people have evidence of his work, and they share it with their friends, family, relatives, coworkers, local media outlets, social networking sites, etc. Eventually, truth will be exposed, much to our government's disgust and subsequent denial. Then, the powerless will become the powerful.

August 14, 2009 at 3:45pm by viko Johns

Thanks for help, you do a great job. buy essay

August 21, 2009 at 6:21am by John Davidson

This data is fascinating and well worth using. But this is only a piece of the overall puzzle. Both "Influentials" and "Accidental Influentials" exist and both have to be taken into account. No two campaigns should be exactly the same. And good old fashioned intuition is fantastic as well and adds passion and creativity to the process. But trusting your intuition to the point of ignoring all other factors is self-righteous and stupid. The same goes for data and statistics. The key is looking at all of them and using all the data available. People at the extreme ends of this debate will never do as well as the ones that take valuable data from both sides instead of arguing who was more right. The truth is in what works. So both sides have some truth. And I intend to use both to my advantage.