“Check it out. It's actually a jet engine," says Johnathan Goodwin, with a low whistle. "This thing is gonna be even cooler than I thought." We're hunched on the floor of Goodwin's gleaming workshop in Wichita, Kansas, surrounded by the shards of a wooden packing crate. Inside the wreckage sits his latest toy--a 1985-issue turbine engine originally designed for the military. It can spin at a blistering 60,000 rpm and burn almost any fuel. And Goodwin has some startling plans for this esoteric piece of hardware: He's going to use it to create the most fuel-efficient Hummer in history.
Goodwin, a 37-year-old who looks like Kevin Costner with better hair, is a professional car hacker. The spic-and-span shop is filled with eight monstrous trucks and cars--Hummers, Yukon XLs, Jeeps--in various states of undress. His four tattooed, twentysomething grease monkeys crawl all over them with wrenches and welding torches.
Goodwin leads me over to a red 2005 H3 Hummer that's up on jacks, its mechanicals removed. He aims to use the turbine to turn the Hummer into a tricked-out electric hybrid. Like most hybrids, it'll have two engines, including an electric motor. But in this case, the second will be the turbine, Goodwin's secret ingredient. Whenever the truck's juice runs low, the turbine will roar into action for a few seconds, powering a generator with such gusto that it'll recharge a set of "supercapacitor" batteries in seconds. This means the H3's electric motor will be able to perform awesome feats of acceleration and power over and over again, like a Prius on steroids. What's more, the turbine will burn biodiesel, a renewable fuel with much lower emissions than normal diesel; a hydrogen-injection system will then cut those low emissions in half. And when it's time to fill the tank, he'll be able to just pull up to the back of a diner and dump in its excess french-fry grease--as he does with his many other Hummers. Oh, yeah, he adds, the horsepower will double--from 300 to 600.
"Conservatively," Goodwin muses, scratching his chin, "it'll get 60 miles to the gallon. With 2,000 foot-pounds of torque. You'll be able to smoke the tires. And it's going to be superefficient."
He laughs. "Think about it: a 5,000-pound vehicle that gets 60 miles to the gallon and does zero to 60 in five seconds!"
This is the sort of work that's making Goodwin famous in the world of underground car modders. He is a virtuoso of fuel economy. He takes the hugest American cars on the road and rejiggers them to get up to quadruple their normal mileage and burn low-emission renewable fuels grown on U.S. soil--all while doubling their horsepower. The result thrills eco-evangelists and red-meat Americans alike: a vehicle that's simultaneously green and mean. And word's getting out. In the corner of his office sits Arnold Schwarzenegger's 1987 Jeep Wagoneer, which Goodwin is converting to biodiesel; soon, Neil Young will be shipping him a 1960 Lincoln Continental to transform into a biodiesel--electric hybrid.
His target for Young's car? One hundred miles per gallon.
This is more than a mere American Chopper--style makeover. Goodwin's experiments point to a radically cleaner and cheaper future for the American car. The numbers are simple: With a $5,000 bolt-on kit he co-engineered--the poor man's version of a Goodwin conversion--he can immediately transform any diesel vehicle to burn 50% less fuel and produce 80% fewer emissions. On a full-size gas-guzzler, he figures the kit earns its money back in about a year--or, on a regular car, two--while hitting an emissions target from the outset that's more stringent than any regulation we're likely to see in our lifetime. "Johnathan's in a league of his own," says Martin Tobias, CEO of Imperium Renewables, the nation's largest producer of biodiesel. "Nobody out there is doing experiments like he is."
Nobody--particularly not Detroit. Indeed, Goodwin is doing precisely what the big American automakers have always insisted is impossible. They have long argued that fuel-efficient and alternative-fuel cars are a hard sell because they're too cramped and meek for our market. They've lobbied aggressively against raising fuel-efficiency and emissions standards, insisting that either would doom the domestic industry. Yet the truth is that Detroit is now getting squeezed from all sides. This fall, labor unrest is brewing, and after decades of inertia on fuel-economy standards, Congress is jockeying to boost the target for cars to 35 mpg, a 10 mpg jump (which is either ridiculously large or ridiculously small, depending on whom you ask). More than a dozen states are enacting laws requiring steep reductions in greenhouse-gas emissions. Meanwhile, gas prices have hovered around $3 per gallon for more than a year. And European and Japanese carmakers are flooding the market with diesel and hybrid machines that get up to 40% better mileage than the best American cars; some, such as Mercedes's new BlueTec diesel sedans, deliver that kind of efficiency and more horsepower.
Recent Comments | 74 Total
February 12, 2008 at 2:23pm by Amber Walker
Is this guy married?
February 25, 2008 at 8:03am by Matt Cooke
Read the text Amber, he plans on converting his WIFE's car!
This guy is a visionary for sure, a true messiah in a world inhabited by sheep. The automobile is dead, long live the automobile!
March 17, 2008 at 6:31pm by Arthur Hawley
Highly recommended read and to consider, since fuel prices are only going to continue to rise!
March 18, 2008 at 2:20am by Sridhar Oruganti
Way to go.
Guys like Johnathan deserve a pat on the back and BUY their tech
March 18, 2008 at 2:21am by Sridhar Oruganti
Way to go.
Guys like Johnathan deserve a pat on the back and BUY the tech
March 18, 2008 at 2:22am by Sridhar Oruganti
Way to go.
Guys like Johnathan deserve a pat on the back and helped in every way
April 9, 2008 at 11:10am by Mike Cardy
A fool and his money...
You can pick the true from the false pretty easily. Will a Turbine burn Diesel, sure. (Clean?) Can you reduce a 1960 Lincoln's emissions 80%? Of course, put a converter on it. Or something smaller than a big block with a pre-emissions carb. Ever try to drive up to Burger King and ask for 20 Gallons of used grease? Great line. Hope you aren't taking a trip somewhere. Like a drive 60 miles and back. Or a long weekend in the mountains. How's that stuff flow in the Indiana winter?
Sure, electric motors have great torque at all RPM, but when was the last time you saw a 1960's turbine cold start to full power and shut down in seconds. How long did it live? Was it clean and efficient? Driving a generator to fill supercapacitorbatteries, I assume he means some capacitors to dump into an electric motor for a few seconds of drag race.
100 MPG? Under what parameters? Off the top of his head, "I'll do 100".
It works great to sell to rock stars, sports stars, and other multi-million dollar folks with maybe a GED. Or bankers with no mechanical knowledge.
Riding the eco-wave with great marketing buzzwords, and making money. That's the smart part.
April 30, 2008 at 8:27pm by
Mike C apparently can't read: Goodwin's not dreaming this stuff: he's already DOING it! His vehicles CAN run on waste veggie oil, OR you can drive up to a pump and put in diesel. Yeah, your last line might have been a concession that Goodwin's got something going on, but the gist of your post was doubt in something that's already working. Not bright.
If one man can produce cars of this sort, and he is, then GM and other companies can and should produce them. Think about their economies of scale; they CAN make these vehicles, and make them affordable to the average citizen. It's about time they pulled their heads out and DID so!
May 5, 2008 at 5:27am by Michael Lavoie
It appears to me this man is nothing short of a genius. Mike C is obiviously playing devil's advocate, which is fine of course, but the problems he pointed out could easily be solved by like minded professionals provided this technology goes mainstream. The real problem it seems and was pointed out in the article is the non availiability of the alternate fuels. Auto makers don't want to produce the vehicles because the biodesiel, ethanol, and hydrogen aren't widely availiable to the public masses. Without the fuels being widely availiable the public won't buy the vehicles. So the real question is, how do you introduce both simultaneously? Regardless, I give kudos to John and his incredible ideas. It incredible and exactly what this country needs during this critical time and if nothing is done soon, the problems will continue to spiral out of control. How long before we as a people are outraged by the energy crisis? When is enough enough? When the cost of fuel reaches $5.00 a gallon? How about $6.00? Families are having to decide between food or fuel. The technology is there; we need to make this happen.
May 29, 2008 at 4:24pm by Bill Reid
GM says that this can't be done. GM says that battery technology needs to catch up to build a successful electric car. They are fools or liars. Altairnano (ALTI) has the batteries, 100 miles per charge, recharge in 8 min., 250,000 miles over all driving equivalent.
June 9, 2008 at 10:32pm by Sean Carter
Detroit is a *dinosaur*. Ford, GM, whatever- the problem is that once any company reaches a certain size, the accountants take over from the engineers, and from that point on the focus is on suppressing competition rather than accepting any kind of change to the way they do business. The music industry is another example of this phenomenon. Are you listening, accountants? You are the problem! Raawr!
June 11, 2008 at 9:31am by Johnny Grisdale
This is addressing Sean Carter's comment below. Accountants are the problem? What business are you in, where accountants are calling the shots and working to suppress competition? Detroit is dying & the big 3 are dinosaurs, you're correct about that. The changes they are making now are way too little and probably too late, but the problem starts in the boardroom and the C-suite, not with the accountants.
June 18, 2008 at 3:00am by Ron Howard
Mike Cardy is DEAD RIGHT!,there is nothing to be gained with Hybrid vehicles except a feel good response from those with the bucks willing to replace a $10,000 lithium battery every 5 years.
And why waste timew and energy on a big ugly inefficient military truck?.Does this guy have a small penis or is he familiar with the old saw well known by con artists that the biggest con is always the easiest to pull off?
And has thr journ responsible ever stood close to a turbine engines exhaust?,has he or any of the cheer squad ever wondered why Chrysler and Rover in the UK abandoned turbine engines in the 60's. That exahuast comes out at several hundred degrees folks,check out a turbo prop aircraft taxing sometime and look at the heat waves comming off.Imagine a car....can you say " global warming" ??
Nothing is ever new under the sun.
June 18, 2008 at 10:19pm by Stuart Janssen
Actually, Chrysler stopped the turbine project because while the 63 model produces almost no pollutants, it did produce nitrogen oxide, though they fixed that problem in the 70s, not because the engines ran really hot. I don't know if you've noticed, but exhaust from your average internal combustion engine is pretty hot because the engines are powered by explosions. And even if the turbines did run exceptionally hot, the fact is that the engine he's using will only run in short bursts to charge the other drive train.
August 5, 2008 at 7:44pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:45pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:47pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 5, 2008 at 7:48pm by Bob Crow
August 7, 2008 at 7:52pm by Bruce Zanetta
November 9, 2008 at 8:19am by david anderson
If this guy and his claims are for real, there is no good reason why GM and Ford aren't getting with the program! The diesel engines obviously run on diesel - if he can couple it with an electric motor that can either charge itself or run purely on electric power at high efficiencies the only thing that matters are the MPG and the pricing for the vehicle. Not to mention this guy is cobbling these vehicles together out of off the shelf parts- I find it hard to believe Detroit isn't all over this - like last week!! Of course, American automakers have a shady history when threatened by outside innovation - just google the name Tucker.
November 11, 2008 at 4:31am by Josef Heath
Even I thought that was impossible. I wouldn't believe it till I see it. I bet he'll just put an additional auto engine part to it.
December 10, 2008 at 4:16pm by Aaron C
I like what this guy is doing - and would love to see it continue - but at some point the States are going to have to let the Feds take the lead in setting the rules for fuel and emissions... otherwise guys like this will be arrested for tampering with emissions equipment.
March 3, 2009 at 5:14pm by Kristina Kittle
Looks like some pretty neat stuff.
April 2, 2009 at 9:28pm by petty deh
he's too bright =) i like him.
July 16, 2009 at 5:24am by Steve Howard
I run my Mercedes and Nissan on WASTE veggie oil and have done so for some time. Lots of people do this. We have lots of diesel cars coming on the market today and hybrid electric cars. There are lots of company doing diesel fumigation. What Johnathan is doing is great stuff but he is far from the innovator implied in this article, just search the web. Plant oils are a great fuel alternative but we need great caution or we will fuel our cars and starve the poor. Johnathan keep up the great work but please be reported accurately for the good of all not just you. peace and blessings Howie
July 31, 2009 at 8:19am by Michael Sanders
Hopefully, Mr. Goodwin is smart enough to document his research notes, drawings, etc. in multiple formats (photos, audio/visual, printed, etc.) and to distribute same to anybody and everybody. Let's see the government keep his inventions hidden when 100,000 people have evidence of his work, and they share it with their friends, family, relatives, coworkers, local media outlets, social networking sites, etc. Eventually, truth will be exposed, much to our government's disgust and subsequent denial. Then, the powerless will become the powerful.
August 14, 2009 at 3:45pm by viko Johns
Thanks for help, you do a great job. buy essay
August 21, 2009 at 6:21am by John Davidson
This data is fascinating and well worth using. But this is only a piece of the overall puzzle. Both "Influentials" and "Accidental Influentials" exist and both have to be taken into account. No two campaigns should be exactly the same. And good old fashioned intuition is fantastic as well and adds passion and creativity to the process. But trusting your intuition to the point of ignoring all other factors is self-righteous and stupid. The same goes for data and statistics. The key is looking at all of them and using all the data available. People at the extreme ends of this debate will never do as well as the ones that take valuable data from both sides instead of arguing who was more right. The truth is in what works. So both sides have some truth. And I intend to use both to my advantage.