Feedback

Aesthetics Revisited

I, for one, applaud the creative effort that went into the so-called offensive images in the March and May issues [the baby suit on page 56 of the March issue, and the raw meat eater on page 87 of the May issue]. To infer that the images used were offensive is to disregard their relevance to the content of the information provided. The bottom line is that images are meant to stimulate the thought process in reference to the material, nothing more. If a picture says a thousand words, subscribers are getting a lot of words for their money, because the two images featured spoke volumes! I am sure that many (including myself) found those images to be quite entertaining.

Jeff Glaze
Atlanta, Georgia

Fast Fix

In our July/August article "Rise of the Aerotropolis," we incorrectly identified one of the underwriters of New Songdo City. The name of the developer is Gale International.

How to Give Feedback

Send us an email (loop@fastcompany.com) Submission of a letter constitutes permission to publish it in any form or medium. Letters may be edited for reasons of space and clarity.