They're what I like to call "impassioned environmentalists" with their brands. They don't let very many people touch them in the way of design or positioning or communication -- verbal or non-verbal. It's all done internally.
A lot of brands are trying to position themselves as "cool." More often than not, brands that try to be cool fail. They're trying to find a way to throw off the right cues -- they know the current vernacular, they know the current music. But very quickly they find themselves in trouble. It's dangerous if your only goal is to be cool. There's not enough there to sustain a brand.
The larger idea is for a brand to be relevant. It meets what people want, it performs the way people want it to. In the last couple of decades there's been a lot of hype about brands. A lot of propositions and promises were made and broken about how brands were positioned, how they performed, what the company's real values were. Consumers are looking for something that has lasting value. There's a quest for quality, not quantity.
Alan M. Webber (awebber@fastcompany.com), a founding editor of Fast Company, favors gold coast blend and maple-oatmeal scones. Scott Bedbury is a Sumatra man (hot or cold).
Recent Comments | 6 Total
August 18, 2009 at 3:45pm by Chris Terian
Great points about sticking to your identity! As an SEO consultant I hear many brands talk about doing social media when their target demographic is nowhere near the social media realm. Many brands lose their identity by trying too hard.