We have a "type" of open space plan with larger "group-style" cubicles and I think THEY inhibit camaraderie. Too open of a space makes it hard for privacy and conversations that people would be "shy" to have in front of others unlike the somewhat hidden-from-view a cubicle offers.

"Cubicle-style" is too vague; there are cube farms that are in reality just pigeon-holes. But cubicles can be arrayed in a way that doesn't isolate. I know because I've worked in such an environment; close quarters with two others (only one of which was directly in my group) and found it a real help.

How many millions of dollars have been spent on research concerning layout of retail space? I can't believe that office space justifies less effort.

In the space I was allowed to lay out (9 people, 3 teams) I aimed for one thing: to allow each individual at least one angle where they could make direct eye contact with others, while ensuring that they could withdraw into semi-privacy without having to wriggle around.

I don't think it inherently inhibits camaraderie; like anything else in the office, it depends on who is sitting in the cubicles. Whether it inhibits productivity is a separate issue.

I would love to answer this one in my normal way, but it does. I have my own office now, but when I was in Dilbertland; there were times I needed to concentrate on what was on hand. I did not need to hear about the kids, wife, hubby or other related crap all the time. Even though I was in my hole these conversations were happening all around me, thus making me pull back from being friendly.