Connect with Fast Company

You are correct Kevin that the blog is introspective, it is about a 9 month journey and it is meant to be growing of a mind with attention turned inwards to my own writing. The line "a Society of Thieves" is no different to Seth Godin's line "Steal an Idea" - except what I am alluding to is the creation of original thought. I don't know whether I am even capable of sustaining that and nor do I want the traditional view of the blog to rob me of that opportunity. There is one question of course that I find about original thought, such as why in our society like ours have not seen another William Shakespeare?

What I am saying is that it is OK to write a blog that does not need to be read by anyone but yourself. I accept that there will be comments and neither do I disagree with your assertion that it is legitimate to share and give ideas, I thoroughly welcome that, steal away if that is what people want to do.

This blog however fails the moment it becomes one more blog of mainstream popularity, in that failure is an abortion of original thinking and that can only occur IMHO if we truly do live in a society of thieves. Maybe we don't live in such a society but only time will tell. Beyond that this is a provocative statement and if I didn't make it I would be writing about how I should be eating banana's, it is easy to pay my psychic attention to banana's.

One more association to consider, you may know or not know that "Mark Zorro" was a pseudonym created at the Fast Company discussion boards over 8 or 9 years ago, when the concept of BRAND YOU first appeared - the idea that we can sell ourselves like a product (one that clearly by the creation of this pseudonym did not appeal to me). That too is a part of the society of thievery, for if brand dictates who we are, or at least where we to start to weave a life that no longer separates image from reality - then it is the very that Jiddu Krishnamurti was saying, that we cannot have a relationship with an image.

Beyond that it is interesting journey and I don't know what is going to be born of it. It is perfectly all right to fervently disagree because that is where I am differentiating a weblog from a womblog. The weblog is about telling society what is you think - a womblog is allowing ideas to flow from the mind and nurture over time (to incubate your own mind over nine months). I said in today's piece that "language matters" and that is something that I want to improve, so definition is important - if I came out here all defensive and unsure of myself then that would already be a lesson for me, but then again, what happens if I succeed, what does society do then - because when this nine months are over I intend to walk away into the night back to my regular life. So tomorrow morning I am going to be writing about POETRY, and you free to see what I mean by it - but I am not writing for a society of conspicuous consumption or benevolent sharing, I am writing for emergent thinking.

What emerges I do not know but whatever it is I most not lose my attention or be distracted by social curiosity or interest; and in doing so have something precious taken away from me, my own concentration. I actually agree with what you have said above, but you don't have to agree with me, because Kevin, for I do not attend give birth to twins and at the end of this, all I want is to emerge a wholesome and better human being - and if sitting silently and lurking is a better way to do that, then that would be, because I would have discovered that, this is the better alternative.

As the Bible says something a fool is known by his words and I do keep that verse in the back of my mind whenever I write......M.