We are already immersed in a culture in which everything is a commodity, and by choosing a consumer item as a name for your child, you are putting that kid in the same category as a Cuisinart. (Now, don’t all jump on “Cuisinart” as the name for your new baby at once.) In so doing, you are preparing this child to then think of him or her self as a commodity, setting the stage for a lifelong work/life balance struggle that could have disastrous consequences. After all, if you’re named “Lego,” it can only be a matter of time before you start to subconsciously take on the expectations of your name. You feel obligated to live up to its legendary toy status. You find yourself wanting to “fit in” to an inordinate degree. And you realize that with a little effort and body positioning, you can look like an airplane or an apartment building.
But, if you absolutely must name your child after a treasured product, why not at least choose ones that will give that young ‘un a positive self-image, and not unreasonable expectations of success? For example, why not name your baby:
DEPENDS – Connotes reliability, to both work and family.
KFC – This is one child who will not have any use for trans fat.
GOODYEAR – An empowering name which reminds the child that the year he came along was, indeed, a good year. Mind you, one must remember to keep the blimp references to a minimum.
INTEL – A name that tells the world your little one is smart. Of course, this could also get him beat up at school, although maybe, if Obama gets in, not so much.
HOME DEPOT – No question this one grows up to be responsible to the family, as well as being handy with caulk.
So, if you’re planning on branding your little one with an unconventional name torn from the world of retail, think long and hard, my friends. And for poor little “Lego,” be afraid. Be very afraid.
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on LinkedIn