Fast Company iPad edition promotion


FC Member Blog

1st Amendment versus Confidentiality

BY Marc Hausman | 02-20-2008 | 2:49 PM
This blog is written by a member of our blogging community and expresses that member's views alone.

A decision last week by a San Francisco-based federal judge to order the
shuttering of Wikileaks.org presents an interesting dilemma for public relations
professionals.


The Internet and other forms of electronic communications
(i.e. e-newsletters, email, personalized social networks, blogs, etc.) is an
effective channel to target, message and engage key audiences -- including
customers, partners, employees and investors. Yet, if we view the Internet as
communications and collaboration platform we then must assume the First
Amendment rights provided to traditional news media also apply.

The other
side of the argument is based on an expectation of confidentiality. As a PR
representative for a number of publicly traded companies, I take the
non-disclosure agreements we enter into very seriously. They establish a
baseline of trust that affords us access to our client’s senior management.
Violation of confidentiality by an insider or external consulting firm is simply
inexcusable.

This is a tough issue and I’m torn. What do you think?

Judge Orders Wikileaks Web Site Shut
New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/19/us/19cnd-wiki.html?8au&emc=au

 

Read more posts at:  http://www.strategicguy.blogspot.com