It's official: Living in a city is bad for your brain--or so says some new research by University of Michigan scientists. Specifically, the team of psychologists found that being in an urban environment depresses memory performance and attention spans.

It's a fascinating discovery, to say the least. Our modern society has progressed in leaps and bounds as people converse, exchange ideas and develop new technologies in urban environments. The city is an intellectual meeting place, center of commerce and transportation. But it seems from this new research that even ten minutes spent walking in a busy city street affects our core mental functions.
The researchers collected data by equipping volunteers with GPS tracking units, and having them walk different routes through Ann Arbor--some down main city streets, some through Nichols Arboretum and the University's Matthaei Botanical Gardens. The volunteers then underwent psychological tests that profiled their attention span and memory performance. Those who walked through natural environments scored significantly higher on both aspects. Fascinatingly, similar results were achieved when the subjects were subjected to a sequence of photos of urban or natural environments: 20% higher scores for those who had a glimpse of nature.
"Interacting with nature can have similar effects as meditating," according to team-member Marc Berman, also noting that "People don't have to enjoy the walk to get the benefits." It seems that it's just the presence of a natural environment that makes the difference--the team found similar results in balmy weather or when it was freezing outside.
Natural settings, it seems, apply less of a load on our cognitive processes, compared to the flurry of inputs and choices an urban environment--with all its people, traffic, technology and artificial shapes and sounds--makes. Somehow this has knock-on effects deep in our brains. Of course this study simply exposes the results, and an understanding of the mental mechanisms that drive this behavior is much more complex. But it's clear that our brains developed as we evolved in a natural environment.
And at least the study found that the beneficial effects of a natural environment counteract the negative effects of an urban one--to sharpen up your brain, you simply need to go outside and find a park to stroll in.
The team's work is likely to have an impact on helping people suffering mental fatigue, and is sure to pique the interests of urban planners. As Berman puts it "It's not an accident that Central Park is in the middle of Manhattan. They needed to put a park there."
I don't know about you, but I'm instantly switching my screensaver to a bunch of photos of forests and lakes and waterfalls--as long as I can concentrate long enough to remember that's what I want to do.
[Michigan University, Boston Globe]
Related Stories: | Topics:Innovation, Work/Life, attention span, mental abilities, psychology, lifestyle, memory, michigan university, urban places, city living, Marc Berman, University of Michigan, Central Park (New York), Ann Arbor, The Boston Globe |
Recent Comments | 4 Total
January 7, 2009 at 12:45pm by Sharon McEachern
Yes, nature is medicine! "While people have searched high and low for ways to improve cognitive performance, from doping themselves with Red Bull to redesigning the layout of offices, it appears that few of these treatments are as effective as simply taking a walk in a natural place," wrote Jonah Lehrer in the Boston Globe.
Now that we know the results of all this research hopefully more and more designers and landscape architects will continue to look for ways to integrate nature into our lives. Another really article on this research is on the Ethic Soup blog at:
http://www.ethicsoup.com/2009/01/the-art-my-backyardis-by-artist-leung-g...
Sharon McEachern
January 7, 2009 at 2:49pm by jimmy Howe
the title of the article is confusing with the intention of the piece of writing here. Urban living doesn't make you stupid. As far as concentration and mental activities in the wild, a psychologist or scientist should be more concern with the human factor of processing direction findings and other mental activities in the order of survival as an example. The heading is a miss leading statement, and I only click on the title from finding it stupid, and so I can complain on stupidity about scientific research.
January 7, 2009 at 3:21pm by Noah Robischon
I wonder if the results would be different after walking in an architecturally rich city, like Manhattan, versus one that is more industrial. There are arguments for either outcome - perhaps the buildings in NYC are even more distracting?
January 8, 2009 at 5:06am by Kit Eaton
If an urban environment depresses your core mental functions, then I think it's arguably correct to say it makes you stupid. Scientists and other researchers try not to force their research in any particular direction, as part of the scientific method, and just occasionally come up with a piece of esoterica like this. Their results are pretty undeniable, and something other scientists will bear in mind.