Always a caring bunch, E.U. lawmakers have just mandated that MP3 player makers remind their users of the risks of hearing damage from prolonged, loud headphone use. Their ruling is based on some sensible science, and it's aimed at teens.

In fact, specific scientific advice has suggested that between 2.5 million and 10 million E.U. residents are at risk of hearing loss. That's if they listen to their MP3 players turned up enough to deliver 89 decibels of sound for more than an hour a day over five years. That sounds like rather a hefty whack of iPod abuse, but if you pencil it into the awkward stages of a youngster's life from 12 to 17 years old, it becomes a lot more plausible. Think back to your own youth, and the horrible sounds (so your parents said) you listened to at incredibly high volumes. Then translate that into more concentrated MP3 audio delivered directly into an ear canal by ear-bud.
The range of MP3 devices being sold can push out music between 80 and 115 dB, though if you use in-ear buds you can add up to 9 dB to that figure. The Encyclopedia Britannica notes that 120 dB is equivalent to "amplified rock music" (presumably at a concert) while 130 dB is like "artillery fire at close proximity"; at this level you'll experience the "onset of pain." Different people quote different figures, but the general level at which permanent damage can be caused is around 85-90 dB. So the E.U. has reason to worry.
Now they're requiring that manufacturers tell you to turn your system down and suggest that you limit the amount of time you use the product. There's also a ruling on the way that will limit the output to 80 dB--but users will be able to override that soft barrier by adjusting the player's settings. It's obvious who this ruling is aimed at. Apple. Its iPod range is the best-selling system in the world, but it already includes a built-in volume limiting system that's actually user-selectable, and the manuals seem to agree with E.U. suggestions already. What else can the E.U. do? Ban MP3 players? The thing to remember is that if you're trying to force teenagers to do something for their own good, on average you're going to be fighting an uphill battle.
[via YahooTech]
Related Stories: | Topics:Innovation, Technology, MP3 Deafness, iPods, mp3, E.U., safety, health, volume limits, personal audio, law, Science and Technology, Audio and Video Devices, Digital Music Players, Electronics, Consumer Electronics |
Recent Comments | 2 Total
September 28, 2009 at 5:33pm by Ash Sangamneheri
Hmm.. some suggesions
1. Noise reduction tech should be built in the device, so users are not forced to increase the volume to hear the music.
2. Volume level should be displayed in deciblel (dB) not some arbitrary measure. So people are aware how loud the music is set to.
3. If the user plays music at a higher than safe volume for a set period the device should automatically turn it down?
September 29, 2009 at 5:13am by Kit Eaton
@Ash. All very sensible sir! Here's my thoughts on your thoughts:
1. Is the way to do this to build a tiny mic into the canal section of an ear bud, to properly sample noise levels in the area where it matters?
2. Nice thinking--everyone wants to turn it to 11. The difficulty is that dB is a logarithmic scale: moving from 3-4 dB is very different from 75-76 dB. The public is 100% used to dials that scale linearly. Perhaps an "equivalent dB" digital display is better?
3. Fab thinking.