RSS

It's Time to Ditch the Physical Keyboard

BY Kit EatonFri Jun 26, 2009 at 5:40 AM

Lenovo spent two years on the design of its new business laptop--but not on its internals. It took that long to tweak two keys on the keyboard. In this light, might it be time to ditch the old clickety-click of physical keyboarding?

Lenovo T400

Lenovo's T400s is, by most accounts, a pretty solid machine, aimed directly at the business user. It's also slightly thinner and lighter than previous efforts, even while it retains most of the trademark seriously staid Lenovo styling. But it's in that design that we learn about the extra large escape and delete keys, stretched vertically since that's the direction you tend to reach when you type. It took lots of experimentation, tracking of users habits, and careful thinking to come up with this change. And it kind of makes sense--for non-letter keys, these two are typically not enlarged on computer keyboards, yet they get an enormous amount of use (check yourself typing, and you'll see).

But since it takes such a huge effort to tweak two small features in the design of a QWERTY keypad, isn't it time that the humble physical keyboard get phased out?

There is, after all, an alternative beginning to take off in the smartphone world: Touchscreen-based, or soft-keyboards. The iPhone has one, the two newest HTC Google phones do, as do many new smartphone-class devices. They have the advantage of being totally reconfigurable, since the changes simply have to be completed in code rather than a physical tweak. You can also switch languages easily, and custom gaming or program-specific keys are a breeze. But it's not just smartphones--don't forget Microsoft Surface. Next-gen e-readers will have touchscreens too, and when the smartbooks and Internet tablets start arriving, touchscreen keyboards will begin to be ubiquitous. It's in-keeping with many designers visions of the future, and advancing touchscreen science.

There are of course people who will argue this idea is nonsense. "Must have a physical keyboard!" they shout, and point at the Palm Pre's advantage over the iPhone in this regard. The riposte to that is simple: you like a physical keyboard merely because it's what you're used to...it's not necessarily the best option. And yes, touchscreen tech isn't quite perfect yet. More advanced haptic feedback, or even textured screen technology, would aid in locating the right keys with your fingertips. Yet even the current technology is perfectly serviceable--texting on an iPhone is just as fast as battering away at a cellphone numberpad.

If it takes a major computer manufacturer such a long time to effect a simple change to the keyboard, then that's the sign of a technology that's coming to the end of its life. It's a 150-year old layover from the typewriter era. But there's just one issue that will get in the way. Physical QWERTY as a design has a gargantuan inertia, which is why supposedly better physical alternatives like Dvorak haven't taken off.

[via BostonGlobe

Related Stories:
Flexible Touchscreen E-paper Signals the Rise of Touchscreens
Microsoft Moving Surface Off the Table and Into Your Home
Who's Afraid of the Touchscreen BlackBerry?

Topics:

Innovation, Technology, Design, keyboards, computer keys, QWERTY, touchscreens, Lenovo, haptics, smartphones, t400s, Laptops, Science and Technology, Technology, Apple iPhone, Consumer Electronics, Electronics


Sign in or register to comment.
or

Recent Comments | 2 Total

June 28, 2009 at 4:24am by Aaron McGree

Touchscreens are great for some things, but for my work they are virtually useless. I am a software developer so I have to type large amounts of text that has lots of symbols in it. Take a look at all of the symbols on a physical keyboard. There are some there that most people don't normally use, so touchscreen keyboards tuck those away in a special menu. The problem is that I use those symbols extremely frequently.

Space is the other problem. If you're typing a few words into an iPhone then there isn't really any problem with space. In my case, I might be working on several different files at the same time and need to see all of them. A touchscreen takes up a massive amount of screen space.

I bought a Lenovo laptop a few years ago partially because of the good reputation of their laptop keyboard. Lenovo doesn't want to destroy that reputation so they wanted to be cautious with their tweaks.

Incidentally, I am typing this with a Dvorak keyboard layout, but with a keyboard that is labeled for QWERTY. Dvorak hasn't died off yet. ;)

June 29, 2009 at 6:00am by Kit Eaton

@Aaron. I think I make the point in the article that if you had a serious PC with a touchscreen keypad, being able to customize it to put whatever keys you wanted within easy reach is a serious boon. I type on a Portuguese keyboard, which sacrifices square brackets for letter accents--how do Portuguese coders tackle this problem? You're assuming future laptops will be tablet-only affairs... I suspect that'll often be the case, but the idea that the lower half of your laptop could be replaced with a touchscreen, DS-style, is an intriguing one, no?