Shel Holtz is principal of Holtz Communication and Technology. After a rather general and basic morning introduction to the practice of business blogging at the New Communications Forum in Napa, California, he provided an in-depth look at perhaps one of blogging's more challenging applications: the spin and damage control aspects of PR. Can there be a balance between a business's need for quality formal communications in a crisis situation -- and the personal, informal nature of blogging? What follows is a partial transcript of Holtz's session:
Blogs have not been used much in crisis communication. "PR crisis" is a phrase that gets bandied about, but what we're really talking about is business crisis or corporate crisis. A crisis is something that you can't anticipate. An airplane crash is not a communications crisis. It's a crisis, yes, but it's not a communications crisis. That's a drill. They have binders. They're prepared for it.Also, blogs don't change the fundamental nature of a crisis. They change the basics of how we can respond to them. There are three categories of crises. A meteor crisis is what happened to Tylenol. The organization is absolutely a victim. It's easier to deal with, but it's still going to affect your reputation. Another type of a crisis is a predator crisis, where someone is out to get you. Whistleblowing is a predator crisis. You tend not to be too much of a victim. A lot of times, someone is revealing information about you that's accurate. Then there's a breakdown crisis, a failure to perform.
In crisis communications, your goals are going to be to maintain a positive image of the company, to present timely information, and to remain accessible. The standard approach to responding to a crisis is to hunker down behind closed doors. Blogs can help companies remain accessible. You also want to monitor communications channels to catch misinformation early. Ultimately, you want to survive the crisis.
There are seven stages of a crisis. The first is surprise. Management is always surprised when there's a crisis. Then you realize there's not enough information to know what's going on. Management perceives that they're losing control. The public starts to pay a lot of attention; that's when management adopts the siege mentality. Then they adopt a short-term focus.
Why do crises escalate? The public attaches little credibility to business advocates. The public is also risk averse. The media role in a crisis is based on conflict. Advocacy groups will exploit a conflict for their own purposes whether they're accurate in their portrayal or not. What's most important to remember, though, is that people respond emotionally. It is not logic that is at issue. You will never win a debate in a crisis by using logical arguments. Your values count. You have to reaffirm your values in a crisis.
There's always a symbol in a crisis. For the Exxon Valdez, it was dead birds. For Enron, it was people leaving their offices with boxes. Your priorities need to be with the affected party or parties. A key example is Odwalla. The philosophy at Johnson & Johnson is that shareholders are last.
Respond quickly, accurately, professionally. Treat perceptions as fact. Acknowledgement mistakes that were made. Tailor messages with the angry public in mind. And acknowledge the other side's concerns. Don't confront anybody, though. That just doesn't pay off. Take advantage of existing relationships you have.
So, why a blog in a crisis? You have the ability to offer updates instantly. You can use a human voice to accommodate the public's emotional response. And it produces a record of your response.
The group then broke into a discussion addressing how to identify who should contribute to a business blog in a crisis, how to remain open to negative feedback and response, and how to ultimately make the negative into a positive.I'd also like to offer some guidelines. Stay on focus. Have one author represent the organization. Make sure that posts are approved. And publish only facts, not opinions. It's very important for companies to have blogging policies, and certainly, don't replace your crisis communications plan with blogs. It's got to be part of the mix.
Update: Here's another report on the session.
Related Stories: | Topics:Technology, re:con new communications forum, Science and Technology, Technology, Internet, Media, Blogs and Blogging |
Recent Comments | 10 Total
January 27, 2005 at 7:41am by Tim
I've got two observations here:
- it's not enought to turn to blogs suddenly in a crisis; by using them as part of the day-to-day communications mix, you're able to position the organisation as inherently open and communicative. And this should in turn aid the perception of being trustworthy when the meteor really does strike.
- this applies just as much internally as externally. Particularly if you're in an internal service function, managing perceptions and crises is just as important from a career perspective as it is for the organisation to do so from a market standpoint.
March 3, 2005 at 6:44pm by George Anderson
I believe that blogs should also be considered in a proactive manner. Currently, anger in the workplace is becoming a pervasive problem. Rather that wait until a crises occurs, it seems wise to use blogs to offer preventive measures to address this issue before it explodes.
SHRM, the professional association of H.R. managers is devoting a major article in its June issue of their Newletter to Managing Anger In The Workplace.
March 16, 2005 at 9:47am by Treper Philippe
Bonjour,
Autant je comprends qu'il faille veiller les blogs afin de ne pas se laisser distancer dans certaines situations de concurrence, de renseignements ouverts, autant j'ai du mal à admettre que le blog puisse devenir un outil de gestion de crise ce qui signifierait que de l'anticipation nous soyons passés à la réactivité, c'est-à-dire la défense.
En revanche j'admets parfaitement que le blog puisse être utilisé comme une arme de lancement de rumeur, de déception voire de manipulation. Dans ce cas il me semble illusoire de combattre sur ce domaine. Il est de loin préférable de traiter avec une agence de presse pour redresser la barre avec des messages clairs et vérifiables. De plus qui peut en permanence couvrir et veiller ce qui transite dans le monde si ce ne sont des sociétés bien appareillés et rémunérants de fins observateurs ...
Have a good day.
PHTPR
April 18, 2007 at 12:53pm by Gerard Braud
As I read Shel's article today 4/18/07 following the Virginia Tech shootings, I find it sad that schools and companies have not been able to understand the business case for writing a crisis communications plan and having the tools and training in place to communicate rapidly in a crisis.
Gerard Braud
gerard@braudcommunications.com
http://braudcommunications.com/
August 23, 2007 at 6:01pm by Ari Novick, Ph.D.
I have owned two blogs for some time, but believe that the use of blogs can be helpful in addressing crisis. Blogs can help people in real time, which can be extremely helpful.
February 5, 2008 at 10:05pm by lol
http://index1.newworldmen.com >hurricane documentries
February 6, 2008 at 4:09am by lol
http://index1.seekcounty.com >cumberland woods
February 6, 2008 at 4:09am by lol
http://index1.seekcounty.com >cumberland woods
February 6, 2008 at 9:39am by lol
http://index1.allnewfilm.com >massepequa boses
February 6, 2008 at 9:39am by lol
http://index1.allnewfilm.com >massepequa boses