RSS

Why Market Share Is the Most Important Metric

BY Fast Company staffMon Aug 8, 2005 at 12:13 PM

Market share is the most important metric that marketers can use in order to judge the effectiveness of marketing campaigns. This includes branding initiatives, advertising campaigns, CRM programs and any other revenue generation effort. Market share metrics are more important than ROI measurements. The reason is quite simple. Market share is a relative measurement against external benchmarks. Market share tells us how we are doing relative to our competition.

It amazes me how many enterprises ignore market share and focus on internal metrics like satisfaction, awareness, loyalty, churn, leads, recall, revenue growth, margin improvement etc. The problem is that internally focused metrics can be deceiving. While the inwardly focused enterprise may be happy with its results, this satisfaction can be delusional if the enterprise is performing below par relative to competition. Which is one of the reasons why many large customer-centric enterprises are vulnerable to attack by smaller more agile challengers.

While market share is the most important metric other measurements are needed to develop a complete picture. Units, revenues and margin must also be tracked in order to determine the ultimate value of your market share. There are many ways to measure share. The easiest is to rank revenue or measure absolute volume in unit sold or gross sales generated. By itself volume measurements are a start but need to be further described by the value of your market share. Having 70% share of a market in which you are losing money is not a sustainable strategy.

Topics:

Innovation, blogjam 2005, Business, Marketing, Marketing Campaigns, Advertising and Related Services, Professional Services Sector


Sign in or register to comment.
or

Recent Comments | 4 Total

August 8, 2005 at 1:01pm by johnmoore (from Brand Autopsy)

As a marketer, the two metrics I concern myself with most are (a) comp sales and (b) comp transactions. I want to know if we are driving more sales than the year/month before and increasing our transactions more than the year/month before.

Since there are only three ways to increase sales [(1) get customers to buy more; (2) get customers to buy more, more often; (3) raise prices], I am much more interested in measuring success with comp sales/comp trans figures than I am with market share numbers.

Obsession with market share can cause companies to do some drastic things like sacrifice margins, poor mergers, reckless discounting, and lazy brand extentions all in hope of increasing market share to become bigger.

I believe companies should seek to be the BEST and not the BIGGEST.

August 8, 2005 at 1:27pm by Mike Smock

We use market share because it provides an external benchmark for measuring progress. I need both internal and external inputs to really understand my performance.

Obsession with market share can also cause companies to improve product quality, innovate new products and improve the customer experience as they compete to be the best.

August 10, 2005 at 5:29am by Peter Rees

I've always thought to measure what I value.

June 18, 2007 at 11:30pm by Christian

Increasing market share is good if your ROI increases too. If I get 30% return on my investment in my business why would I want to expand my market share to get 10% return, doesn't make any sense. Many companies have been destroyed because of increasing market share but destroying profitability(ROI). On the other hand no company has been destroyed by decreasing ROI.