RSS

Must-Have TV

BY Fast Company staffFri Oct 21, 2005 at 12:58 PM

Congress, according to the New York Times today, has now mandated that all TV sets must be digital-capable by April 7, 2009 (which, for you sports fans, is one day after that year's NCAA basketball championship game). What the heck does this mean?

A couple things. First, if you own one of the 20 million TV sets that still uses rabbit ears, you'll lose out. You'll get no reception at all. (Hey, at least you caught that last game.) Not to worry, though. Congress has earmarked $2 billion for you and your Luddite friends to buy you a set-top box so you can adapt your old set to receive the digitized signals.

Second, we'll all be getting a bunch more channels. Think CBS1, CBS 2, CBS3, ABC4, ABC5, ABC6, etc. Kinda like BBC3, or HBO Family. This is because when the signal space now occupied by those networks is converted from analog to digital, they can slice it a lot thinner, thus fitting more channels into it. And you thought there were too many cable channels already.

I think so too. Numerous studies have pointed out this interesting paradox: Although we love the idea of choice, we don't actually practice it. Even though we get all excited about having 400 channels, we only watch 12 of those on a regular basis, according to research.

Think about it. Count the number of TV stations you flip through when you sit down at night. You've probably formed a habit, and that takes you through about... 12 channels, before you give up. A few years ago, Bruce Springsteen sang a lonely song about "57 Channels and nothing on."

Still, you can't stop progress -- nor should you. CBS should launch at least five more digital channels, if only to create a CSI for every city in America. That way they can sell more ad time, target it more directly, and at least have a fighting chance to keep up with the Googles of the advertising world.

As for me, maybe I'll even add one of those new digital channels to my favorites list. Or not.

Topics:

Work/Life, entertainment, Media Sector, Television Broadcasting and Production, Broadcast Media, Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Industries, Digital Televisions


Sign in or register to comment.
or

Recent Comments | 2 Total

October 22, 2005 at 11:03am by mahendra kumar dash

It is a market growing up and up.Why US alone,through out the world there are still billions left who do not have TVs.It is this market which is still untapped and the manufacturers are aiming at.

October 26, 2005 at 3:12am by Mark Alan Effinger

I totally agree with both Springsteen, Marshall McLuhan and at least the majority of the general public: gimme' choice, but give it to me in byte-sized pieces...

Digital or not.

Look, we all know the only good viewing on cable these days has to do with Indie flicks, some vibrant reruns of Darren Stevens trying to do another storyboard, and John Stewart+Steven Colbert (and if you haven't seen the latter, you are sorely missing great TV... TV in the form of a mobius strip).

Micropayment selective television would better suit most of America... but there's no "breakage" (the excess revenue generated by users who only tap a portion of their monthly allotment of pre-paid content... sort of like those health club dues you keep paying while working late at the office... again).

So... my take?

Turn all rabbit ears into jacobs ladders (at least they're cool to watch) and let's get pay-to-play TV happening.

When you get a moment, also read my great uncle's book on TV vs Commercials (George Alec Effinger). The commercials are 45 minutes long, vs the "shows" being 15 minutes. A great indicator, tongue in cheek, of our inevitable future.

Best,
ME