RSS

Chappelle's Show: The Repo'ed Episodes

BY Fast Company staffMon Jul 24, 2006 at 6:41 PM

Last night marked the last of three “Lost Episodes” of Chappelle’s Show material filmed before Dave Chappelle’s abrupt departure during production of the show in 2005. And airing the footage may prove to be a big mistake for Comedy Central.

Let’s recap: The third season of Chappelle’s Show was highly anticipated, and probably would have been a huge success for CC and Chappelle regardless of the quality of the material, had it been completed. DVD sales and critical acclaim from the second season led the channel to fork over a highly publicized $50 million check for another helping. Then their star walked out, leaving the channel suddenly without a scheduling cornerstone. More than a year later the channel got its revenge...

The “lost” episodes, aired against Chappelle’s publicly-stated wishes, were cobbled together in an approximation of the sketch show with replacement hosts Charlie Murphy and Donnell Rawlings (Ashy Larry) introducing the bits and making good-natured jokes about Chappelle’s absence. And that’s really what the whole thing was about. The opening credits, which had featured two bluesman playing the show’s one bar theme until it’s namesake walked on camera was replaced. Instead the two old men play for a moment until one comments, “I don’t think he’s coming.” No kidding. And that stale joke (we heard that one a year ago) works as a metaphor for the bulk of the new episodes (especially this one) with the exceptions of this and this (not necessarily office friendly). No wonder Chappelle didn’t want this stuff on national TV.

Now let’s talk strategy. Did CC do the right thing for its business by using the material to bring in some of the lost advertising and sales revenue? Given that Chappelle probably wasn’t coming back anyway, the channel most likely wasn’t concerned with burning him. But they should have been. By airing this footage, CC may have poisoned the well for future talent. The channel of took a half-completed creation from one of its biggest breadwinners and exhibited it for the world against his wishes. And they did that to one of the biggest comedy stars on television. That kind of behavior has got to cause other talent to pause before signing on themselves, especially up-and-comers who hold much less water and probably look up and relate to Chappelle. And on top of that it hyped a weak show, which diminishes its credibility with its audience.

Since the channel has a monopoly on cable TV comedy, the fallout may not be fatal, but burning the talent and disappointing the consumer is no way to run a business.

Topics:

Work/Life, arts + entertainment, Dave Chappellea, Comedy Central, Media, Entertainment, Television


Sign in or register to comment.
or

Recent Comments | 8 Total

July 25, 2006 at 9:15am by Steven Burda

Comedy's great!

-Steven Burda
http://www.linkedin.com/in/burda

July 25, 2006 at 10:11am by Jim Wesnor

Look at it in simplest marketing terms:

What are the available substitutes? For comedy on cable, none. For Dave Chappelle's unseen material, none. For Dave Chappelle's comedy, DVDs. For comedy on TV, "Last Comic Standing" (which because of scheduling is non-competitive). For comedy, ????

There's very little risk of customer defection because of "substandard" material in this case because there are very few available substitutes. In my mind, it was a good move. Chappelle fans might be interested in seeing the sketchs, as would others. The down-side risk was small.

July 25, 2006 at 10:26am by Bg Porter

I have to agree with Jim. I think that anyone watching these episodes is likely to know the hubbub surrounding them, and is used to living in an era of DVD releases that contain as much outtake and background/bonus material as feature presentation.

I've watched a few of these episodes and was glad that I was able to see them.

July 25, 2006 at 12:18pm by Uncle Fester

It's all about content. CC presumably has ownership rights to the Chappelle material, so however CC wants to play it out is their right. How does CC owe him any favors after he screwed them out of a third season? CC acted out of their own best interests. The move to air the last episodes has little to do with revenge.

As well, to think that some starving young comic will take "pause" because of such a move by CC is ridiculous. It's hard not to believe that an up-and-coming comedian would do anything to have their own show on the channel. They are it, when it comes to comedy on cable, or on television in general.

July 25, 2006 at 12:40pm by suie

It's called LIFE in the big and beautiful, competetive world of communications, creativity and comedy!

July 25, 2006 at 7:38pm by some joe

Bah Chapelle wasn't very good anyway who cares... Now give Robin Williams his own show on CC and watch real comedy....

July 27, 2006 at 6:50pm by cml868

I don't doubt that many up-and-coming young comics look up to Chapelle, but I can't see many being able to relate to his leaving $50 million on the table.

July 27, 2006 at 10:27pm by roger fulton

"Show...BUSINESS.".....business, people. Dollars and cents and the mental acuity to manage them.