A fascinating new book, The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves,
by the economist W. Brian Arthur, was just published that challenges
much of the conventional wisdom that we hold about the relationship
between science and technology.  Most notably, the notion that science
is the horse to technology’s cart; in other words, scientific
advancement results in technological innovation.

Dr. Arthur turns this notion on its ear by arguing that, in fact,
the evolution of science could not occur without relevant technological
discoveries.  Though science would still exist in some form with its
foundation in human curiosity, exploration, and deduction, it would be
primitive compared to where it is today were it not for the emergence
of new technologies that enable breakthroughs that allow us to access
information beyond our narrow sensory, cognitive, and physical
capabilities. Think electron microscope, computer, hydrogen-fueled
rocket, and particle accelerator. Inventions such these free our
intellect and creativity from their all-too-human shackles by expanding
the universe of what is possible. Because it’s impossible to imagine
the impossible, technology makes what was inconceivable and puts it
within our sight and our grasp. Without the necessary technology, the
questions that would advance science could not be pondered.

To read the rest of my post, please visit my Techshrink blog at computerworld.com.