You heard me. The creators of the American version of The Office have done what's almost impossible in business: They've developed a copycat product that's better than the original. This usually doesn't happen because copycats tend to be lazy and only out for a quick buck. They're not interested in quantum improvement. But if last night's episode on NBC, the single funniest comedy I've seen on television since Seinfeld circa 1993, is any indication, The Office is not only a critical home run but it's viewer-friendly enough to be a hit eventually.
There are only two reasons why anyone's made such a fuss about Ricky Gervais' The Office here in America:
1) Anglophiles who are always going to think British stuff is better. To which I say, I think there's a Red Dwarf marathon going on. Why don't you go watch it?
2) Americans have been so starved for a good comedy about the workplace that even a British show that has all the comic timing of a dry martini is sought out and cherished because According to Jim isn't speaking to them to make them feel better about their miserable jobs.
I watched last night's show on NBC twice and then I watched the BBC pilot. Want to why the American Office is so great and better than the British version? Keep reading.
The first American original of The Office blossoms now that it's been freed from the constraints of the British show. A diversity trainer comes to the office to do a workshop. Hilarity ensues. On paper, you can't fully appreciate it (don't worry, this being NBC, The Office is being reaired on most of its other channels--Bravo, CNBC, USA, etal--so check your cable listings). What makes the show great is that it wrings stunning comedy out of subtle eye rolls, askance glances, and under-your-breath comments. Perhaps the Gervais version does so as well, but it's the difference between an extremely dry martini and one perfectly balanced with a little vermouth. The U.S. version is just wet enough--call it American subtlety as opposed to British subtlety. The U.S. version does just enough to let the viewer know it's a joke. The British version is completely inaccessible that way.
I also think the writing and the pacing of the American show are superior not only to anything else on TV but to the original. Carell upbraiding an employee for making an insensitive comment (the kind of comment he'd make routinely) and capping it off with a comment that this is an open and welcoming place and so get the hell out of here is perfect. Carell begging for emotion from his employees and then telling them that he'd have everyone in tears. I could go on. What's amazing is that the show does what American sitcoms have to do--two jokes a minute minimum, an A plot and a B plot--but it does it in a subversive way. So it works within what Americans understand but it does it brilliantly.
Even Carell was more in control this episode and the critique that some of the blog posters noted--that Carell is the archetype for the boss who thinks he's funny and so his performance is better understood that way--feels like it's very true.
I'll get off this Office soapbox unless news or exceptional episodes warrant, but just watch this show. Pretend the original never existed (no one here in the U.S. ever gave a thought to how classics like All in the Family or Sanford and Son were inspired by British shows). And know that every Tuesday night there's a place that will make you feel better about your idiot boss, idiot coworkers, or idiot employees for at least half an hour a week.
Related Stories: | Topics:Work/Life, culture, United States, American Office, NBC Universal Inc., Ricky Gervais, British Broadcasting Corporation |
Recent Comments | 86 Total
March 30, 2005 at 9:02am by stephen
You're smoking crack, man. It's a great show, but nowhere near the original. Now which version of Red Dwarf should I go and watch? The British one, or the American one?
March 30, 2005 at 9:12am by Bobster
Last night's episode was hilarious, and Carell is great, but it's tough to reproduce the overconfident patheticness that Gervais encapsulated so well. I really like the new version, but it has yet to prove as good as the BBC - and not because I'm some kind of BBC-elitist, seriously, without Gervais and the fellow that played Gareth, it's just missing something. Still definately worth watching though.
March 30, 2005 at 9:44am by Chunky
So sad. To be such a self hating Anglophile.
March 30, 2005 at 9:57am by Andrew
This show is great ...and it takes place in Scranton...what more can you ask?
March 30, 2005 at 9:58am by Joe Ford
British comedy being done better in the States. Now there's a real scoop!
The Office over here in Old Blighty is just so personal to us - it makes us laugh at ourselves to the point of cringing and wanting to hide behind a pillow. It's awkward, yet utterly enthralling.
I'm not American, so I wont consider making any worthless comparisons. I just wouldn't get it.
March 30, 2005 at 10:26am by Joe Ford
Just one more thing.
It's like saying "There's a tailor in Hong Kong that makes better english cut suits than Thomas McMahon http://www.englishcut.com/ in Saville Row, London." It's missing the point somewhat!
March 30, 2005 at 10:38am by Ted
There is no way the American office is better than the original. It may be good, thank God, but I doubt it will ever be as good as the original. The way you described, it sounds like just another sitcom with a somewhat different gimmick, definately not comic gold.
March 30, 2005 at 10:58am by Nicholas
I enjoyed the American Office, but so far it still pales in comparison to the UK Office. I'll hold off on any real judgment until the end of the first season.
Incidentally, don't you think you ought to actually /watch/ the UK Office (i.e. more than just the pilot) before you pronounce it second-rate or overly dry? At least keep up a one-to-one ratio, one episode of each, if you're going to try to compare them side-by-side.
March 30, 2005 at 11:46am by David Lidsky
Nicholas--
Fair point. I have the rest of season one on TiVo and BBC America airs season two this Saturday and my TiVo's all set for that too. I plan to watch them all. But what I was trying to say was that I watched the first episode of the American Office and I wanted to see it again. I watched the pilot of the British Office and frankly, if not compelled by this debate and my job, I don't know if I'd hang there and watch more if I was just a regular bloke.
March 30, 2005 at 12:19pm by aaron
I can't tolerate "British comedy". That said, the British version of The Office is the most perfect comedy television series ever to grace a TV screen.
The American version office may be the best thing on TV right now, but that's like saying sand tastes better than other flavors of dirt.
The pace of the new version is far too quick (no awkward pauses) and the characters have no depth-particularly Carrell's character. He doesn't make me wince or cringe like Gervais was so brilliantly able to do every time he opened his mouth (ala George Costanza), he's just a bit annoying and dimwitted.
I've laughed out loud maybe two times throughout the two episodes so far. Don't get me wrong- it's a decent show, which I'll continue to watch, but Ricky Gervais' creation set a standard that can't be topped.
I'm guessing the author of this review hasn't actually watched The Office in its entirety. I'd highly recommend he do so.
March 30, 2005 at 12:40pm by Gareth
Is it a Black man's cock?
That's why the American version will never be as good- you can't get away with anything here....
March 30, 2005 at 2:04pm by Rob Guglielmetti
So, the Amercian version is better because they help us idiotic Americans along and show us where the subtle jokes are? AND, you base all your comparisons to the BBC series on just the BBC pilot?
My god. First and last time I'll ever come to "Fast Company". What a rag.
March 30, 2005 at 2:06pm by joesmith
That's crazy...I watched the NBC show just now, there's no comparison.
you're a cock, you're a cock, you're a cock
March 30, 2005 at 3:17pm by Gareth
He's thrown a kettle over a pub, what have you done?
March 30, 2005 at 3:47pm by Scott
It's all a matter of personal taste. I liked the new episode on it's own merit, even though I noticed a huge chunk of the original in it.
It's best not to compare these things. Why can't we agree that the US/UK are different, as opposed to one being superior?
Simpsons, Curb your Enthuisiasm, Larry Sanders.... Blackadder, Black Books, Office... Love them all.
March 30, 2005 at 4:06pm by David Brent (Pip)
They had to move on and spread the word. I can't imagine Jesus going "Ooh, I've told a few people here in Bethlehem I'm the son of God. Can I just stay here with Mum and Dad now?"
March 30, 2005 at 4:38pm by Kel Varnson
"I also think the writing and the pacing of the American show are superior not only to anything else on TV but to the original. Carell upbraiding an employee for making an insensitive comment (the kind of comment he'd make routinely) and capping it off with a comment that this is an open and welcoming place and so get the hell out of here is perfect."
I found that whole exchange to be eerily similar to the one found in episode two of season one of the original, where David introduces Donna to the rest of the office and shares that her father is a cop, which is followed by some inappropriate comments from Jamie and Keith that everyone laughs at, including David. Then someone says "I wouldn't mind escaping up her tunnel," and David quickly bounces back with "Get out." Am I the only who noticed this?
Having said that, I was refreshingly surprised at how funny the episode was last night, a huge improvement over the pilot. However, there is no way [emphasis: NO WAY] this show will be the original.
David's dance, "The Freelove Freeway," inflateable cocks, the "If you don't know me by now" music video, and especially how the Tim and Dawn relationship was nailed beautifully.
March 30, 2005 at 5:34pm by Chicky O'Hare
A thoughtful commentary!
March 30, 2005 at 5:50pm by Webblogger
Great points ! Very interesting
March 30, 2005 at 7:24pm by Mike Torres
Oh please. The BBC version is WAY beyond NBC's version of The Office. What's with the Anglophile BS ?? I'm not American nor British but the NBC version is just like a long SNL sketch. They totally missed the point of original. The NBC version is just like spoonfeeding the humor to the audience just like any other sitcom without the laugh track. The BBC version has it's humor NOT on the jokes and the over the top craziness, but in the familiarity of the characters in a real life Office. Nobody would work for Michael Scott for long in a real Office. Is there a real Diversity day ? American workers won't take that BS sitting down. They actually get guns and shoot each other.
Do us a favor. Watch the BBC version in it's entirety, all 14 episodes, then watch the NBC version. It's like night and day.
March 30, 2005 at 8:23pm by Plain Jane
I liked this review of The Office at www.PatriotActs.blogspot.com
March 30, 2005 at 9:33pm by Mark Zorro
I adore The Original Office not just because I went to college in Slough or that I once worked in an office that made paper products, which are both true statments and hardly worth harking about unless argument is what you were born for; I adore the Original Office because the cast just buzzed pure unaldurated nirvanic chemistry and show was pure biology without any mechanical physics holding the DNA up.
Who can forget the episode where David Brent plays a joke that backfires badly telling Dawn that she was being fired for stealing post-it notes. It isn't about the laughs, the magic in the original "The Office" is the sheer look of schoolboyish discomfort on David Brent's face when he realizes that his joke has totally backfired and it is that stare that Dawn gives and her sharp retort to him that is pure magical chemistry.
There is in life funny HA-HA, that state of mojo that is akin to "who needs a happy pills when we have comedy as a substitute", and there is DEEP FUNNY - THE OFFICE wins its place in the realm of "ORIGINALITY" because it touches that deeper spiritual place, so time may tell us in the long run that the latest version reached levels that put it in the LIFE OF BRAIN class but spiritual humour is the stuff that puts a smile on a Buddha statue - and Ricky Gervais is the nearest thing we are going to get to Buddha-wise comedy, not just a Monty Python sketch or a Benny Hill runaround (though genius of humour is still genius of humour no matter what form originality takes) but the David Brent character ranks right up there with Basil Fawlty in the reincarnation of comic deity.
What needs to be stated here is that there will be no more of the THE OFFICE being made, zilch, nada, nothing, it's another FAWLTY TOWERS collection that one can play over and over and over again and it still remains fresh and true on each DVD spin, no matter what decade we end up living in. (Oh you will get old and when The Apprentice and O.C. no longer does it for you, relax, put the old age can e way, take those well worn dentures out, and put on the ORIGINAL airing of THE OFFICE, it will still be good to go in 2020 even if the American economy is sunk and obliterated by its debt load and all the good jobs are in India and China - let me assure you, David Brent will be just as relevant in 2nd and 3rd Decade of Bangalore and Beijing, as you count the sales from population of billions.
So if there isn't going to be any more the THE OFFICE in the UK, then I say " bless my hearties" because even a cheaper imitation of it is welcome news - after all there was Star Trek after Star Trek and Patrick and William can stand apart as Captains of the Enterprise, so why can't the UK and US Version of THE OFFICE not be held in similiar regard (if the writing is still good).
I don't judge David Lidsky for his tastes, if he loves what he sees, that pure human freedom man, good for him. It is not about American vs British, that war was done in 1776 and the Brits lost, so get over it - comedy shouldn't be the last flag of the Empire or the first flag of American hegemony - it just needs to reach you in parts that other humourolics cannot reach. THE OFFICE isn't about one show - it is about standing the test of time and when Ricky Gervais walked away with a Golden Globes, I said "Nice One Ossie" even though I know it was Ricky who scored the ultimate Wembley GOAL !!!! (Except of course our Ricky was based in Slough).
M.
PS I have no sense of humour, it was THE OFFICE that saved me, saved me for goodness sake - my humour would have been a a humerus bone stuck under the deltoid and bicep of a killjoy Scrooglike face, if it wasn't for...Yes, you are indeed right in thinking that is why he needs to watch the American version. Blessed relief, blessed relief indeed.
(And to the people who I promised to put this "Mark Zorro" character away - ever so sorry, it just blurted out, please be rest assured it won't happen again, just a temporary deviation in a very long winded postscript. It just goes to show how I much I really adored the original and THE "The Office". Long may the US version live, lets see if David Lidsky is still purring over it 3 or 4 years later. (Beijing Olympics or no Beijing Olympics).
March 31, 2005 at 3:56am by Matt
America, Fuck Yeah!!!
March 31, 2005 at 6:57am by Ronald
OMG, i think out of 1 million people in the world, only one would say that the US version of the office is funnier than the UK version. Im not american or british and i would like to say US people are stupid and arrogant, they always think their version is the best. The UK office is the funniest comedy i have ever seen in my life (no exaggeration). The little things, like David's glances at the camera coupled with his idiotic dances were classic. Carell, is absolutely rubbish. His acting is poor and over-the -top. The UK actors were all very good and realistic, but the US actors can't act. Mackenezie Crook was awesome as Gareth. Thatt new guy with the glasses, he's annoying and has no comic timing. The person who wrote the article either is really really naive and stupid or is being sarcastic
March 31, 2005 at 8:50am by Big T
Can't comment on the US series, as I'm still waiting for it to air in the UK. Have to agree with some of the previous posts though, having worked in Slough trading estate the original version would not have succeeded unless is had been re-written. Just look at the diabolical mess that was made when NBC took Coupling in its original form.
It's interesting that series moving in the opposite direction from US to UK seem to have been so well received, Friends, Arrested Development (arguably aired to late) and Desperate Housewives are (or look set to be) a huge success.
On the whole the comedy bar has been raised significantly with the myriad of alternatives available. You only need to look back at the eleven o'clock show where Ricky Gervais's debut guest spot paled in comparison to the Sacha Baron Cohen's "Ali G" character. Remind me which one has succeeded in the states ?
March 31, 2005 at 11:04am by David Lidsky
Thanks to all who've commented on this. I appreciate all of the viewpoints, positive and negative. That said, I'd really appreciate it if anyone would like to explain to me why I am apparently not allowed to express a viewpoint about TV shows without having watched an entire series on which it was based. This isn't the Ring Cycle, folks. It's a television show. It's episodic for a reason. This isn't Dickens being serialized 150 years ago and I've given up on A Tale of Two Cities because I didn't like the excerpt in the March issue of Harper's. It's a TV show.
I made a conscious choice not to be like everyone else and pre-judge the new American show. Most Americans won't have seen Ricky Gervais as David Brent and Gareth and all that. I wanted to experience the way they will. That's frankly more fair than pitching dirt on the American one before it even aired.
Now that I've seen two episodes of the American show and enjoyed it, I continue to watch the BBC show to catch up. Watched episode #2 of season 1 last night. You know what? It was okay, but I didn't see a bright light or start speaking in tongues just yet. Maybe I will after I've watched all of them (perhaps it's like a videogame where something really cool happens once you've mastered all the levels, but I doubt it). That's what people seem to expect of me. If it happens, you'll be the first to know.
March 31, 2005 at 11:32am by aaron
David-
That's the unusual thing about The Office and why most of the posters here insist you have to watch all 14 episodes (including the Xmas specials) before comparing the two- it really was more like a long mini-series with a perfect ending more than it was a classic sit-com. Also, it's not a show you can walk in and out of the room just having it on in the background- you really have to pay attention to the subtle details like you would when watching a film.
Episode 4 is usually where everyone finally "gets it". The show wasn't joke driven, it was character driven (like Seinfeld)- and by Episode 4 you really get a sense of what each character brings to the table.
If after Episode 4 you still aren't sold, then I guess it's just not your cup of tea (as the brits say)....
"I think there's been a rape up there!"
March 31, 2005 at 11:42am by David Lidsky
Aaron,
Thanks for the cogent explanation. I understand your point. As I said, I'll keep watching my backlog of episodes and perhaps I'll get it the way other fans of the original Office do.
David
March 31, 2005 at 12:49pm by James
cock
March 31, 2005 at 1:36pm by Brent
Irony. The yanks will never understand it. Look america, please just go back to burying your head in the sand and leave everyone else alone. Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot, you can't leave anyone alone can you?
"I didn't think they were jizzing on him..."
March 31, 2005 at 1:40pm by Yank
There's a huge difference between American and British irony. I "get" British humor, I just don't find it particularly funny.
The reason The Office is brilliant is because Gervais' influences are all American.
March 31, 2005 at 3:22pm by farm
It's called an education.
March 31, 2005 at 3:47pm by Guin
Well, I'm glad to see we Americans are thought to be all fat, dimwitted assholes. What an intelligent and tolerant point of view.
The fact is, The Office (U.K.) is great. So far, I've also liked the U.S. version.
England takes pride in their comedy, and with good reason. After all, it was the place where Monty Python got their start.
However, to say that American comedy is inferior to the British variety is just myopic. Arrested Development is the funniest show on T.V., for any country. Seinfeld revolutionized the sitcom. The Simpsons, Scrubs, M*A*S*H, The Daily Show with John Stewart; all different types of humor, but all quite funny.
So please, as much as our country is hated, don't say "Irony. The yanks will never understand it." Unless you were being ironic when you said that. You Brits are so subtle it’s hard to tell.
March 31, 2005 at 4:52pm by Kel Varnson
Another point I'd like to make that perhaps some other posters would like to comment on, including Mr. Lidsky -- what really "sold" the UK version, for lack of a better term, was the fact of impending doom for the David Brent character. No one would've ever believed the documentary premise of The Office had it gone on for 5+ seasons with the Brentmeister General in charge. However, after a mere 12 episodes, David Brent was fired. Or "made redundant," to use management-speak. :)
As I've said earlier, I found Tuesday's episode of the US version quite funny and I see some serious potential, although I don't think it will come close to being better than the original. The problem for the US version is that if it does become successful, which I think it very well could, who is going to believe that Michael Scott has somehow been able to hold onto his job for an extended period of time? The typical amount for episodes for a season in the US is 18-22, not 6. How they incorporate this into the storyline will be interesting, if it does take off.
March 31, 2005 at 5:26pm by jorge regula
yes im english but i certainly do not have anything against americans or think that irony is lost on them. furthermore, i have grown to love a lot of american products such as your sports and family guy, probably the funniest tv show ever written, so i dont think that opinion should be based on geography.
however, having seen gervais' office and then this week watching the 2 american episodes i cant help but think that the writers of the new version have let the side down. they've taken all the classic jokes and kept them pretty much the same yet their own original bits just never reach the same heights. another major problem is that the guy replacing the gareth character is completely wasted and adds nothing to the show. carell is carrying that side all to himself and its just too hit and miss, whilst the dawn and tim aspect is just identical to the british version (the guy playing tim is very impressive mind). truthfully, though, we all know gervais' original version will be remembered and the new one will just be a footnote stating how nbc tried to cash in on it. it may entertain for a while but like all remakes, its completely redundant.
March 31, 2005 at 5:30pm by David Lidsky
Kel--
Smart take. (Although you did just technically "ruin" the ending of the original Office for me. I don't really care, but thought I'd point it out.) But here's the thing: There are destructive, incompetent, soul killing bosses in practically every organization today. I am truly grateful every day that I am not working for such a person at Fast Company. But I have in the past, it's not a secret to the higher-ups, and they still get rewarded despite driving away talent, making boneheaded mistakes, and being offensive.
I once had a boss who insulted me and my fellow colleagues almost every day. We were doing award-winning work, but it was never good enough and eventually you just lost the will to put in an effort for this guy and we all left. I've had white bosses do black dialects in front of black employees. And those sort of things weren't isolated events. These people had successful careers despite what everyone knew, above and below that toxic leader.
So could a workplace show with a pinhead boss like Michael Scott sustain itself at the typical length of an American series? Sadly, yes. It's an open question whether people will want to see that kind of person for years and years or if The Office will fall victim to the Buffalo Bill syndrome (American viewers have a tendency to reject unlikable protagonists). But I don't think that running thread of layoffs and consolidation is an essential element in terms of payoff. If I were running the show, I'd just focus on all the things there are to satirize about office life, one of them being that everyone feels like they could come in and padlock the place at any minute. Fact is, in America, what would likely happen is that the employees would get laid off and the manager would get a cushy new job. Again, I've seen it happen so many times that it's not stretching credulity to imagine it in fiction.
March 31, 2005 at 5:49pm by AG Pennypacker
The Office is the only "sit-com" that made me cry.
I was just wondering whether will there ever be a boy born who can swim faster than a shark.
March 31, 2005 at 6:16pm by aaron
David---
That's not the ending- the Xmas special(s) end the series. And I hope no one ruins the "real" ending- as it's nearly perfect. So if they don't air that on BBC America, make sure to rent the DVD.
Thanks for starting this topic by the way- it gives me a chance to pontificate on the only British TV show I've ever had the patience for- let alone absolutely loved....
And I agree with you- there are many bosses like Michael Scott...
March 31, 2005 at 9:56pm by Gareth
In my experience, women who work in factories are slappers.
March 31, 2005 at 11:08pm by aaron
It's educational -Pound for pound there is more sugar in a lemon than strawberry. Look it up.