If I wanted to make sure this post did not go viral--according to the standards put forth by Hubspot viral marketing scientist Dan Zarrella in "The Science of Retweeting"--I could promote it on Twitter by posting something like this:
was bored watchin the game on tv and saw this thing about RTs...made me lol after i had really bad stomach cramps
Note the lack of punctuation, the use of of slang and abbreviations, the limited vocabulary, and the awkward overshare--all traits that Zarrella can now definitively say would turn Twitter users off. How? Because the avid Twitter-er and author of the upcoming The Social Media Marketing Book spent nine months analyzing roughly 5 million tweets and 40 million retweets (which are usually symbolized with an "RT" on Twitter). He noted when they were posted, which words they used, whether or not they included links, and more. Then, he says, he compared the two groups to get the first "real window" into how ideas spread from person to person: "Retweets may seem like a small idea...but many of the lessons [they teach us] will be applicable to viral ideas in other mediums."
The full report is 22 pages, and won't be available until tomorrow (UPDATE: It's here). But Zarrella offered me a sneak peak--via Twitter, no less. Below, his nine most effective ways to get retweeted on Twitter:
1. Link Up (But Don't Use TinyURLs)
In Zarrella's sample, links were three times more prevalent in RTs than normal tweets (19% to 57%), suggesting that their mere prescence could help buoy your bon mots. (Not sure whether that holds true for sporadic use of French terms.) But choose your URL shortener carefully: Newer, shorter services, such as bit.ly, ow.ly, and is.gd, were much likelier to get retweeted than older, longer services, such as TinyURL. Ouch.

2. Beggars Can Be Choosers
Although conventional wisdom suggests that SPAMmy pleas, such as "PLEASE RETWEET," would be generally ignored, Zarrella found the opposite. "Please" and "retweet" were his third and fourth "most retweetable" words, preceeded only by "Twitter" (duh) and "you." Also worth noting: "Check out" and "new blog post" were Nos. 19 and 20, respectively.

3. Avoid Idle Chit-Chat
Okay, let's face it: We all occasionally tweet about "boring" activities, such as sleeping and watching TV. But alas, these are the types of words and phrases Zarrella dubs "least retweetable." "There are a number of '-ing' verbs, including 'going,' 'watching' and 'listen-ing,'" that were not retweeted very often, he writes. Translation: Unless you've got a really interesting life--Shaquille O'Neal, anyone?--do not legitimately answer Twitter's "What are you doing?" prompt.

4. Don't Be Stupid
So much for abbrevs and emoticons. :-( Zarrella's RTs not only have more syllables per word than normal tweets (1.62 vs. 1.58), but they're also more intellectual: Per a Flesch-Kincaid test, comprehending RTs requires 6.47 years of education, while normal tweets require just 6.04.

5. Semicolons = Satan
A whopping 98% of RTs contain some form of punctuation (compared with 86% of normal tweets), with colons, periods, exclamation points, commas, and hyphens leading the way. (Where you at, question mark??) But Zarrella really sticks it to semicolons, calling them "the only unretweetable punctuation mark."

6. Break News
This one's kind of a no-brainer, but original content is way more popular than stuff we've already read: The words in Zavella's normal-tweet sample were each found 89 times in other tweets, on average, while words in the RTs were found just 16 times.

7. Use Proper Nouns Properly
Most RTs were heavier on nouns, proper nouns and 3rd-person verbs, suggesting that headline-style tweets--such as "Lindsay Lohan Escapes From Rehab Facility"--are more likely to go viral.

8. Bottle Those Emotions
Sorry guys, but nobody wants to promote your f---ing, stupid feelings:
Tweets about work, religion, money and media/celebrities are more
retweetable than those involving negative emotions, sensations, swear
words, and self-reference.

9. Tweet at 4 p.m. on Friday
'Nuff said.

Click here to follow me on Twitter.
[Graphs and data via Dan Zarrella]
Related Stories: | Topics:Innovation, Technology, twitter, Dan Zavella, tweet, Re-Tweet, viral marketing, buzz, Dan Zarrella, Twitter Inc., Lindsay Lohan, Shaquille O'Neal, Shaquille O'Neill |
Recent Comments | 35 Total
September 21, 2009 at 9:17pm by Wan Kim
Dan, Your work is meaningful, memorable, and valuable.
September 21, 2009 at 9:47pm by Adryenn Ashley
Interesting supposition. I'll try out his theory, but based on my own RT history, I would say these are just some of the characteristics. We've been very successful getting RT'd using the strategy developed by @AnnEvanston based on social psychology.
September 22, 2009 at 12:49am by Nilesh Babu
"Newer, shorter services, such as bit.ly, ow.ly, and is.gd, were much likelier to get retweeted than older, longer services, such as TinyURL. Ouch." for "share it to digg / stumble upon / facebook etc"; ur twitter uses tinyURL :D
September 22, 2009 at 12:58am by Aly-Khan Satchu
Virology is a very interesting subject and The Tipping Point the apogee of the subject.
Aly-Khan Satchu
www.rich.co.ke
Twitter alykhansatchu
September 22, 2009 at 2:10am by Timo Luege
I'm not sure the stats about URL-shorteners are particularly meaningful. But maybe I just misunderstand the graph. The way I understand it the graph just says which url-shortening services are the most popular in RTs, right? This stat by itself merely tell us which services are used the most, not whether using them has any effect on RTability. Keeping in mind that bit.ly for example is the default service for popular Tweetdeck, this is hardly a level playing field.
September 22, 2009 at 3:37am by Mary Hodder
I'm guessing none of these have been put to the standard 4-quadrants of scientific testing (where you need to know when A+B happen, when A happens without B, when B happens without A, and when neither happen) but you could certainly claim:
Nine Data-proven Ways to Get Retweeted on Twitter
because in a way, the data does "prove" your arguments. However, I bet if you did subject the data to scientific scrutiny that some of these would not bear out.
However, it's a very interesting list. Thanks for putting it together. But as a tech writer I would suggest a bit more skepticism when writing headlines such at your's above.
September 22, 2009 at 3:56am by Laurent Raufaste
Thanks for this work !
September 22, 2009 at 9:11am by Gareth O' Neill
Great stats. Is the time of day US time or GMT?
@garethoneill
September 22, 2009 at 9:30am by Adrian Chan
Though I can't help but think that there's an awful lot of contextuality lost in measuring retweetability by words rather than phrases, clearly the research on the latter would be a far greater challenge, and this is fascinating nonetheless.
It strikes me that linguistic expressions that are requests and appeals would facilitate retweeting. And then tweets containing links have value that is easily redistributed -- so use of links makes sense. Tweets that are open and not directed by @name are also more retweetable because they're not addressed to anyone.
But clearly we retweet what's interesting to us and which we think others will find interesting; what might make us look good; what might attract followers; what puts us in the company of people we respect/admire -- these and other "social" dynamics provide much of the motive behind why we retweet. And supply the meaning that we glean or put into how we talk on twitter.
A study of phrases would be fantastic.
September 22, 2009 at 9:47am by Christopher Harris
@Timo Luege not only that, isn't it the default URL shortner for twitter in general (from web/sms/etc.)? if that is the case then of course bit.ly will be the highest. twitter took out url shortner competition making bit.ly their default.
September 22, 2009 at 11:29am by Mike Harrop
RT http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/dan-macsai/popwise/report-nine-scientifi...
September 22, 2009 at 12:18pm by Matthew Freeman
Great information -- this is why I enjoy optimization.
On the URL shortener: I’m wondering what would be revealed by segmenting based on the industry of the person who originally tweeted. It could very well be that the newer shorteners would be utilized sooner by a more tech savvy crowd; which could result in speaking to a more tech savvy audience, who might be more likely to retweet. Also, a person who would be first to discover a new shortener would likely be the same person who would be the first to discover other news and information. So, cross-referencing this information by industry or category could shed light on whether or not the shortener had anything to do with it. I would suspect it didn’t.
Keep posting great reports!
Matthew Freeman
Nashville SEO
September 22, 2009 at 1:42pm by Rob Hallums
Then surely this is the most unretweetable tweet in history?
jimmywim @rob_hallums lol; This definitely isn't going to get retweeted (but it's rescheduled for 9am, some game this, haha!)
Bit of genius from Jimmy there!
Question I have is that with all of this 'evidence', where's the bit about qualitative tweets? Surely the most RT tweets are trusted, interesting and insightful?
September 22, 2009 at 10:48pm by John Vasko
I saw Dan give a presentation on this at the Social Media Camp in NY during Internet Week. It was interesting to see and it looks like he's spent even more time on it based on your curation of his content - glad he got picked up by Fast Company!
September 23, 2009 at 5:47am by Rashmi Moghe
Great finding! I think Twitter should be used to share or generate knowledge/information, personal messeging should be carried out on other spaces such as facebook....
September 23, 2009 at 2:40pm by Patrick Neiler
I have a feeling (whoops, forgot that I can't write about feelings ;-) that those "Friday at 4pm" stats have much to do with #followfriday
September 23, 2009 at 3:25pm by Tsadi Shvo
This is interesting. I've now changed the intro I use for blog post tweets - I can't wait to see if it makes a difference.
I agree with Patrick though - #followfriday is the reason why so many things are RT on Friday at 4p - BTW, is that eastern or pacific time?
@shiraabel
@tchochkes
September 23, 2009 at 3:30pm by Phil Dunn
Big piece of the puzzle missing here... which is *who* is tweeting and retweeting. This just shows the twitter habits of the most popular tweeters on the service. I'm guessing that Guy Kawasaki is retweeted in the afternoon late in the week, etc. And he knows how to create good titles. Ditto for Andy Beal, Leo LaPorte etc. I agree with Timo below for the same reasons...popularity of URL shorteners used.
September 24, 2009 at 9:37am by Mark Kychma
Another trick would be to use even catchy and jinglier URLs, like WEEK.LY/top or maybe GOOG.LY. Ask to do something QUICK.LY and WISE.LY. SURE.LY you get it COOL.LY ;)
September 24, 2009 at 11:33am by Rodger Banister
Dan, this is a great article and very helpful.
I agree with Matthew Freeman. Newer URL shorteners are likely to be used by early adopters, therefore people read and RT their tweets because they assume the information is original. Whereas older URL shorteners, like Tinyurl are analogous to your mother telling you about Facebook.
September 24, 2009 at 5:55pm by Elaine Schoch
This was interesting; particularly the days of the week people are tweeting and RTing. Thanks!
September 29, 2009 at 1:37pm by Eric Matas
This data is so fun. The other Dan (Zarella) has been letting bits and pieces out on his blog, and I eat it up.
I wonder, though, how all of this data looks depending on who is getting re-tweeted. In other words if leaders like @Guykawasaki and @danzarella use bit.ly then it's not a bit.ly preference so much as a Guy and Dan preference. Then again, I do like bit.ly because it will warn me about links if they have reports of sketchiness!
September 30, 2009 at 7:26am by Alex Chua
Great information, Dan. Your findings help me organize time and tweet construction. Have a sequel to this article for GlobalBusinessCafe.com?
October 3, 2009 at 11:21am by Kenneth Brown
Dan Macsai for writing such a wonderful article and Dan Zarrella for sharing great insights into Twitter human behavior. This is keeper! I was study this and incorporate this knowledge in my daily practice. I will re-tweet this now and share it with my friends and followers!
October 9, 2009 at 6:35pm by shane haithcock
I have never even bothered with RTs. But, with the info here I can see how it would be beneficial. I'm going to give it a try. I can't rely solely on Facebook.
--
SEO San Diego
January 14, 2010 at 3:54pm by Jason Alexander
ok
February 2, 2010 at 1:38am by Tina Party
Thanks Dan, definitely I will try this, i am not getting much retweets as i expect, hope this theory will change that.. :)
http://www.gobananas.com/
February 2, 2010 at 1:40am by Tina Party
Thanks Dan, definitely I will try this, i am not getting much retweets as i expect, hope this theory will change that.. :)
Gobananas
February 2, 2010 at 1:44am by Tina Party
Thank Dan for sharing this. i am not getting retweets as i expect, but i think this theory will help me.
Gobananas
February 2, 2010 at 1:44am by Veena Alex
Cool work
February 2, 2010 at 1:48am by Rajina Prashanth
Thanks Dan for sharing this. i am not getting retweets as i expect, but i think this theory will help me. :)
Gobananas
February 2, 2010 at 2:43am by TravelScotland Sjhgjh
I doesn't use twitter often... That's why I am not much aware of re tweets. but it seems to be interesting and let me try... Thanks for sharing the information :) cheers
February 2, 2010 at 2:52am by Tracy Jacob
Hey cool and valuable post dude. Really thanks for sharing. Keep sharing new updates :) Travel Scotland
February 2, 2010 at 6:11am by Stag-weekends Party
Thank for your valuable information. This helps everyone to retweet skilfully.
Stag Weekends
February 7, 2010 at 10:12pm by Amy77 sdfsdf
Watch Dear John online