
"Notice anything different? It's the new GOP.com! It's a forward looking, open platform for the party of new ideas. The new Republican Party!"
So says Michael Steele, the RNC chairman, in a video that plays across the newly designed homepage of the RNC: "If you're a Republican activist, this is your space, for your voice!" Then, he does a little shimmy: "Express yourself!"
Indeed. Design and features wise, the new site is basically a checklist of recent Republican talking points; it's intended, more or less, to be a social networking site, in the manner of Barack Obama's famously effective Web mobilization efforts.
And that's just the start: Elsewhere, the site uses design cues to underscore attacks on the DNC. In the homepage video, a summary of recent events--"TRILLIONS IN NEW SPENDING" "TAXES GEITHNER PELOSI"--is rendered in a font that recalls communist propaganda, while the music sounds like something from a Michael Bay movie. There's even the sound of bubbling lava somewhere in the mix. Meaning, I guess, that Democrats will destroy us all, like Mount Vesuvius.
And then cut to the sound of bugles and shimmering cymbals, a gauzy collage, and a fake hand drawn font that declares, "Only you can turn it around."
Now, to be fair, the homepage of the DNC is fairly awful as well--the blog, in particular, kind of looks like Barack Obama's MySpace page. It's also called "Kicking Ass"--given that the DNC logo is a donkey, does that mean they're kicking their own asses?
Anyway, there's a salient difference: Where the DNC site is boring--basically, an attempt to co-opt some of the design cues of BarackObama.com--the new RNC site is strident and, dare we say it, just a weeeee bit desperate. For example, eight of the eighteen people in the GOP heroes section are black; one is Puerto Rican. (Never mind that almost all of them are historical figures from the 19th century, who'd find our modern party divisions unrecognizable.)
The homepage, meanwhile, displays lots of images of young people--including what appears to be a stock image of a young lady in a jaunty paperboy cap. Pretty hip, right guyz?!
Michael Steele's blog is called WHAT UP? Because the new GOP is on that multi-colored rainbow groove, you dig?
All of which makes me wonder: Maybe it's better to be unremarkably bland than comically transparent?
Related Stories: | Topics:Design, GOP.com, web design, Michael Steele, democrats, republicans, politics, graphic design, Innovation, Technology, Republican National Committee, Democratic National Committee, Politics, Political Parties, U.S. Politics |
Recent Comments | 2 Total
October 13, 2009 at 4:20pm by Jerry Capozzoli
It's interesting that whenever someone embraces change we strike them down. I applaud the new look it is refreshing an unmistakingly republican. With everyone producing Obama copycat sites or sites that lack any form of creativity it is nice to see someone willing to take a risk.
Great job RNC!
October 14, 2009 at 5:05pm by Annan Amos
It's at least partially amusing that we keep going through this anti-communist thing every now and again, even though McCarthy was a known idiot who could never conjure evidence of...well, anything. Funnily enough, one of the things that Marx predicted was that a complex financial system that not only produced huge swings of bubble and bust and placed more wealth in the hands of the wealthy, which has been the policy of both Dems AND Republicans since the 60s - and further widened the gap between rich and poor (which has increased at a rapid pace since Saint Ronnie was in office, and as to bubbles - hey look what happened!) would sow the seeds of class conflict that would inexorably lead to a Communist/Socialist uprising. (Although anyone that's done the actual legwork to study Marx knows that party communism is only a transitional stage. Those who have find that most people who rail against Communism never did their homework on Marx, in the slightest.)
And as far as striking down an agent of "change"...neither candidate in this past election would have changed anything, and whatever does change will do so for the worse.