RSS

A Facebook for Patent Clerks

BY Cliff KuangMon Feb 23, 2009 at 2:11 PM

harleytrike1

Innovators don't invent all by themselves: To paraphrase Isaac Newton, great inventors see further than others because they stand on the shoulders of giants. Researchers at the Center for Technology Assessment hope to use that insight to clear out the enormous blacklog of U.S. patent applications, which is stifling American innovation simply because inventors must wait so long to get their patents approved and be assured of their intellectual property. 

They argue that a social network for patents—which allows select volunteers to discuss patents and group analogous innovations—could greatly simplify the patent office's most onerous task: Identifying so-called "prior art"—all the other inventions that inform and compete with any supposed new idea. Already, the researchers have launched the "Peer-to-Patent" pilot project, outlined in the upcoming issue of the International Journal of Technolgy Transfer and Commercialisation. Similar experiments are underway in Britian and Europe.

[Via Physorg; Image is from a Harley Davidson patent for a "leaning trike", via The Kneeslider]  

Topics:

Innovation, Technology, Design, Peer-to-Patent, Patent backlog, Social network for patents, Isaac Newton, Law, Intellectual Property, Patents, United States


Sign in or register to comment.
or

Recent Comments | 3 Total

February 23, 2009 at 4:46pm by Michael Schultz

Cliff,

Fun article. Another initiative making traction in this space is the Article One Partners community (www.articleonepartners.com). Well worth checking out how the private sector is getting involved and providing monetary incentive for prior art research.

Great article on the overall trend at O'Reilly:
http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/01/peer-to-patent-and-article-one.html

(FYI - As a disclaimer, I should note that Article One is a client).

February 23, 2009 at 4:48pm by Cliff Kuang

Hey Michael---thanks for reading and thanks for sending that additional info!

February 25, 2009 at 12:54pm by moe larry

I believe your quote is incorrect. rather, that was said in a famous patent suit concerning Alfred Nobel in England in the 1800's.

further, patent applications are to be treated confidentially therefore peer review is unworkable. read some patent law.