When unfulfilled Apple rumors don't die, there's usually a good reason. Having moved on from the iPhone, the tech rumor mill is now churning up new whispers of a game-changing Apple product: an ultra-thin MacBook. Ultra-thin laptops are nothing new. So why should we care?

Apple traditionally makes quick changes in its product lines; even seminal product re-designs happen inside of 18 months or a year. But when it takes the Cupertino-based company more than a year and a half to launch a product, it's either dead in the water, or deadly to the competition. It took nearly a decade of development for Apple to launch the first OS X. The iPod was a multi-year endeavor, and the iPhone took so long to develop that it developed an almost mythical aura in the tech community. We've been hearing about ultra-thin MacBooks for close to three years now, which means that if and when it arrives at the MacWorld conference in January, it will be a device that leaves other laptop makers scrambling. With the dearth of solid information that accompanies these rumors, I'll put my tech-spertise on the line to predict what we'll see in the ultra-thin MacBook.
What We (Think We ) Know
The rumors I've read make some logical predictions based on trickle down technology from the MacBook Pros. Like the MacBook Pro, the ultra-thin machine will have an LED (or OLED) screen, instead of the traditionally-backlit screen, to save power. That's a no-brainer. It will also probably have a 13-inch screen, ala MacBook, because 13 inches is a good compromise between screen real estate and weight/footprint. Let's go from there.
What I (Think I) Know
Some rumors describe the ultra-thin MacBook as lacking an optical drive, while others consider that option an absurdity. I think the elimination of optical drives is as much an inevitability as was the elimination of floppies; with Internet and wireless technology improving as quickly as it has, tangible media are becoming quickly obsolete. However, the machine will have to come with an external SuperDrive, if only because it's currently impossible to do OS upgrades with anything but a DVD. Maybe OS 10.6 will arrive in USB flash-drive form, but until that (and all software) moves away from discs, the drive isn't dead -- yet.
I'm also predicting built in Wi-Fi as well as built in AT&T wireless broadband. The machine won't have a PCMCIA slot, as the MacBooks don't, so they won't be able to take advantage of wireless broadband cards. Since Apple already has a relationship with AT&T because of the iPhone, they'd be stupid not to include wireless broadband functionality in this machine -- especially since it's an ultra-mobile machine meant for people on the road.
How about the guts? It'll have the same 2.6 Ghz Core 2 Duo chips as the MacBook, but will also have all NAND flash memory. That's right: no hard drive, and no moving parts. This will limit the capacity of the machine; its total storage will probably max out at 40 or 50GB, simply because the inclusion of any more flash memory will be a cost-prohibitive (though possibly built-to-order) feature, but it will allow for near-instant boot times. This hardware profile will position the ultra-thin MacBook above the regular MacBook in Apple's price scale, but below the lowest-level MacBook Pro. It will be in an aluminum enclosure, like the MacBook Pro.
Now for the fun stuff: the groundless speculation. Since the machine is built to be mobile, I'll be expecting a redesigned AC power adaptor with an extra-light body and extra-long, airport-friendly cable. The machine will be only as big as the screen requires: .5" thick, 13.1" wide, and 7" deep, weighing in at about 2.5 pounds. It will include a portable DVD-R drive and possibly even a built-in iPod/iPhone dock to reduce the cable clutter in your computer bag. It might even sport a modified version of OS X that runs a basic-feature mode much like FrontRow provides a basic media mode: a simple, resource-light GUI that gives you immediate access to e-mail, Address Book, iCal, Dashboard and iWork. Look also for enhanced multitouch capabilities on the trackpad, which could allow for the quick and easy manipulation of files and desktop space.
While Apple certainly won't be the first to do a super-slick UMPC, they might just do it better than anyone has so far. And even if American buyers aren't clamoring for yet another small laptop, an ultra-thin MacBook has the potential to bolster Apple's weak presence in Japan, where tiny electronics are adored (if not fetishized). Whatever Apple's reason for introducing the new Mac, Apple devotees should put January 15 on their calendars, and be prepared for something very, very cool.
Related Stories: | Topics:Technology, technology + computers, Computer Technology, Flash Memory, Computer Memory, Apple MacBook, Apple Inc. |
Recent Comments | 5 Total
November 12, 2007 at 10:33pm by Darcy McGee
This:
> but will also have all NAND flash memory. That's right: no hard
> drive, and no moving parts.
May happen, but the market isn't truly ready for this. Commercially availalbe flash memory has a limited number or writes per block at this point in time. You can only write to each block about 100,000 times.
(Caveat: there may be some cutting edge technology I'm not aware of here.)
This isn't a problem for your digital camera, or your MP3 player but think about how an operating system works. For a specific example, imagine your swap file -- your OS is constantly writing to and from the swap partition, ensuring quick degradation of this portion of the flash memory unit.
Don't get me wrong though: I'm on pins and needles waiting for this one. I'm putting off an upgrade to see how this product debuts and how it matures. (I'm not likely to buy generation one after the problems I had with hinges on my PowerBook G4.)
November 13, 2007 at 8:09am by Greg
Apple could do some great things with an ultra thin notebook. It'll certainly be interesting to watch.
I've got 2 main thoughts
1) naturally many people cant hold all the music, photos, and video they want in the 50GB footprint. Is Apple looking at a way to store all your main data elsewhere (on another Mac? on .Mac? on your 160GB AppleTV?) and then sync it down to your laptop....?
2) To attain that small size... is Apple considering using the iPhone's OSX and chipsets instead of the Intel stuff? the iPhone does run OSX... just in a smaller footprint.
November 13, 2007 at 11:17am by Beth
When will they Take Back their computers for free rather than having us Mac users have to deal with the toxic waste when we're done with them?
November 13, 2007 at 3:28pm by Dedicated Hosting
Good post, cant wait to see the thin mac book for myself. Hopefully when I'm in the market for a lap top this will be out.
November 13, 2007 at 4:03pm by alt
Why is it the manufacturer's responsibility to deal with consumer waste? Campbell's ain't tha one recyclin' ma soupcans, but my city gits er done every other week rather nicely.