RSS


FC Expert Blog

Actually, Millennials Do Expect Work Flexibility--Reinterpreting PWC's Survey

BY FC Expert Blogger Cali Yost Wed Jan 14, 2009 at 4:50 PM
This blog is written by a member of our expert blogging community and expresses that expert's views alone.

“We do not expect work flexibility.” That’s the headline from PricewaterhouseCoopers' (PWC) Millennials at Work global survey of 4,271 recent graduates.  Wow.  A strong statement, and one that completely contradicts what I find in my work, which is that millennials not only want work+life flexibility, they expect it. 

The summary of findings concludes that, “Although the millennials seem to indicate flexibility is not expected, we did however receive many comments about wanting more flexibility.”  What?  Which is it?  Something wasn’t adding up.  And might organizations take these findings from the well-respected PWC as license to stop focusing on greater work+life flexibility, especially in this economic environment?

The PWC researchers attributed the difference between the quantitative findings and qualitative comments to the fact that, “Perhaps the millennials do not feel that total flexibility is a realistic possibility, even though it is something they might desire. We also believe that their expectations may change as they get older and the need for greater flexibility for example to look after family members may become more of a priority.”

After digging further, I realized the difference between my understanding of millennials’ expectation of flexibility and PWC’s understanding related to how we defined “work flexibility.” 

The survey asked: “Do you think your office hours will be mainly flexible hours/mainly regular office hours/ regular office hours with some flexible working?”  

The survey found:

  • 66%  Regular office hours with some flexibility
  • 18%  Mainly flexible hours
  • 16%  Mainly regular office hours

My Interpretation:  84% of millennials expect work+life flexibility

  • 66% want to work regular office hours, but expect day-to-day flexibility which are the small, periodic changes in where, when and how they work given their work and personal realities, and
  • 18% expect a formal flex plan that allows them consistently to work flexible hours.   

My definition of work flexibility (or “work+life flexibility”) includes both day-to-day, informal flexibility in where, when, and how work is done, as well as formal flex plans.  And as I suspected, a majority of millennials do want “some flexibility” which means being able to work from home periodically, or come in a little late or leave a little early as needed without a problem. 

That day-to-day flexibility which is so important to this group is not part of the culture in many organizations. If you want millennials to work for you it needs to be, along with a more formal ability to telecommute, work flex hours, etc.  All of this adds up, as I see it, to “we do expect work flexibility.”  

PWC’s Interpretation: “The theory that future generations will reject traditional work practices is debunked.  The majority expect some element of office based working (82%).” 

  • 66% Regular office hours with some flexibility
  • 16% Mainly regular office hours

In other words, if a millennial expects to work in the office for the most part during traditional business hours, they didn’t want work flexibility.  Hmmm.  I am unaware of research that says a majority of millennials want to completely reject traditional work practices (please send me that research if you have it).  But that seems to be the definition PWC used to reach their conclusions. 

Same data, two very different interpretations.  Which is right?  It depends upon how you choose to define work flexibility.  However, I respectfully disagree with PWC’s conclusion that millennials don’t expect work flexibility.  They do.    

What do you think? Which interpretation is correct?

 

Topics:

Management, Careers, Work/Life, Millennials, PricewaterhouseCoopers Millennials at Work Survey, Culture and Lifestyle, Subcultures and Identities, Business, Jobs and Labor, Worklife


Sign in or register to comment.
or

Recent Comments | 3 Total

January 16, 2009 at 9:12am by Michelle Tropper

I think your interpretation is correct. I think that traditional business hours and traditional ways of doing business are so embedded in our culture that they even influence the interpretation of study data, as you've pointed out. A friend of mine works at a company that claims to offer flexibility because it lets employees decide what time they want to come in, but then they still expect 8 hours to be clocked in the office. This is not offering true flexibility - they're just offering flexibility in the start time. It's helpful, but not ideal. This employer would probaly say that it's offering "regular office hours with some flexibility". I disagree - this is "mainly regular office hours" in my interpretation. True flexibility would allow some time to be clocked at home and flexibility for when you come and go, without requiring the full 7 to 8 hours to be clocked in the office, or even allowing different hours/schedules to be worked throughout the week to put in the full-time hours expected of the job.

January 19, 2009 at 10:36am by Joanne Spigner

I just read about a UC Berkely study that confirms your view, Cali. A survey that got responses from 8400 UC PhD students concluded that lack of flexibility in tenure-track jobs is one of the key reasons many of them are contemplating alternative career choices. Commenting on the the "pressure cooker" of early career demands, in particular, one of the study's authors comments that "this generation is different" in seeking more flexibility for managing career and family priorities.