I recently had the opportunity to talk with executives about the issues they experience with incentives implementation, and what we call in Drive Business Performance, the multiple "currencies" of performance.
We observed that organizations consistently find themselves implementing incentives and disincentives that create, in the short and long term, the exact opposite behaviors their system was originally built for. For instance, you might have heard of the Israeli childcare which disincentives program (charging parents for late pick up) backfired on them as parents judged that the benefits of later pick-ups outweighed the daycare's fees (this should give 'food-for-thoughts' to the schools in France and the US which are implementing an cash-to-read program for their students...).
Poor incentive practices often stand in the way of companies' ability to execute their strategy - yet, few can find a methodology that works.
It seems that there are multiple factors to consider - I'm enumerating a few below. What are your thoughts, have you seen best practices within your organizations or at clients?
While this 'personalization' of incentives is argued by some as the most difficult to implement, it certainly feel like as untapped potential. Many say that it leads to better employee satisfaction and is a great way for companies to see what works best with the various personality types of employees that compose their organizational culture.
Join the discussion on the Culture of Performance LinkedIn group @ http://tinyurl.com/o89vep
Best,
Bruno Aziza
Follow @ http://twitter.com/brunoaziza
Facebook @ http://tinyurl.com/yhyl58n
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on LinkedIn