Anyone who has spent time in the Midwestern U.S. knows that spectacular wind gusts are a common occurrence. Researchers at the University of Illinois recently set out to evaluate whether these gusts can be harnessed effectively at that mainstay of family road trips: the highway rest stop.
Professor Patrick Chapman and team evaluated 32 rest stops and over 20 weigh stations in Illinois to determine the cost of installing and maintaining wind turbines versus the cost of energy generated over time. The researchers wanted to find "grid parity", or the point when the turbine's cost matches the cost of grid energy.
None of the rest stops and weigh stations in the study could provide grid parity, but some could get close with government rebates and subsidies factored in. According to the Illinois researchers, it's common for renewable energy installations nowadays to only be viable with government support. But highway rest stops could be more worthwhile in other Midwestern states, as Illinois happens to have cheap electricity compared to its neighbors.
There's also a hidden benefit to putting wind installations at rest stops. Millions of curious onlookers could become familiar with wind energy by seeing it in action up close.
Highways are also experimenting with solar power. Oregon is in the midst of installing an 8,000 foot, 104 kilowatt photovoltaic system at the Interstate 5 and Interstate 205 interchange in Tualatin, with plans to expand the solar highway project in the future.
[Via PhysOrg]
Related Stories: | Topics:Innovation, Technology, Ethonomics, wind energy, renewable energy, solar, truck stop, oregon, University of Illinois, Wind Power, rest stop, illinois, weigh station, Science and Technology, Technology, Energy Technology, Alternative Energy Technology, Illinois |
Recent Comments | 2 Total
March 21, 2009 at 3:36pm by Nunzio Martin
While I am for alternative energies because we have to get away from foreign oil I don't agree that any effort should be subsidized just look at ethanol it can't survive without subsidy and is hurting the consumer because corn is more expensive because farmers would rather sell it for ethanol as well as not grow other crops because it is now artificially more profitable to sell corn than any other crop, what are we going to do once no one wants to grow anything but corn? Subsidize some other crop? It is a vicious cycle.
March 21, 2009 at 4:21pm by Al Heisley
Windmills are fine but please do not rely on corporate sponsorship to finance them. The thought of creating more advertising space repulses me.