RSS

Pepsi Logo Design Brief: Branding Lunacy to the Max

BY Aaron Perry-ZuckerTue Feb 10, 2009 at 3:33 PM
A leaked pdf outlines the thinking behind the controversial new Pepsi logo. It may be one of the most ridiculous things ever perpetrated by somebody calling himself a designer.

If you have yet to do so, take a minute to look through the highlights of the 27-page design brief explaining the thought and design process that brought you the new Pepsi logo.

pepsi-emotionsYou've probably seen the logo everywhere -- tops of taxis, subway stops, billboards -- and wondered if it was inspired by the Obama "O." Would that it were so benign.

The design brief (right-click to save) currently making the rounds of the Web, suggests that, if done right, the new Pepsi logo will likely lead to The Rapture that Evangelicals promise is coming.  It also illustrates the extreme disconnect between the marketing world and the real world.

The presentation, by the Arnell Group (also responsible for the botched design of the Tropicana orange juice carton) contains visual representations of and comparisons with the following: the golden ratio, the Mona Lisa, the Parthenon, the Gutenberg Bible, the earth and its magnetic fields, and the solar system/universe. None of these things have anything to do with soda.

In a modest moment, the authors titled the presentation/pitch  "BREATHTAKING".

Every page of this document is more ridiculous than the last ending with a pseudo-scientific explanation of how Pepsi's new branding identity will manifest it's own gravitational pull. But the craziest thing is that this pitch worked! Pepsi bought it -- reportedly for several hundred million dollars -- and now we have "the emoticon of a new generation."

pepsi-energy-fields

Topics:

Design, Work/Life, identity, graphic design, logo, Pepsi, Barack Obama, The Parthenon, Pepsi-Cola

PEPSI GRAVITATIONAL FIELD.pdf

Sign in or register to comment.
or

Recent Comments | 18 Total

February 10, 2009 at 7:45pm by Horace H. Kempster

This SHOULD be a joke, but sadly it's not. The new design is balls.

February 10, 2009 at 11:14pm by Joshua Murphy

I think you're just jealous that you did not think of it.. This is F-ING genius and if Pepsi bought it for several hundred million, then it was time well spent. Bravo Arnell Group for going to the extra mile to keep your workers employed in this horrible economy! :)

February 11, 2009 at 8:03am by Chee Huat Teo

This reminds me of the movie "Water" by Deepa Mehta. In the movie, the male protagonist was disgusted by his father, who justified sleeping with prostitutes as doing prostitutes a favor as his Brahmin body was 'effectively' purifying the souls of the prostitutes. With a little knowledge, you can justify almost anything.

February 11, 2009 at 1:49pm by Design Fan

I wonder what your professors at RISD would say when they see you dissing the Golden Ratio and example applications of this important design principle as shown in this document such as the Mona Lisa, the Parthenon, the Gutenberg Bible etc., by writing a primitive, thoughtless and ignorant sentence such as "None of these things have anything to do with soda.".

I agree with your assessment on the Tropicana design (I myself had a hard time finding the carton at the grocery store last night) however this is a 27 page serious document that explains the logic behind this design, whether it will be successful or not is a different story but as a writer in this magazine you sure lost credibility by making comments as if you knew nothing about design.

February 12, 2009 at 12:08am by Chris Yeh

Design Fan--this is not a serious document that explains the logic behind this design. Rather, it is an abomination that invokes real design principles like the Golden Ratio to justify a terrible design and even more outrageous fees.

Real designers don't need to cloak their explanations behind a wall of self-important mumbo-jumbo. Real designers can explain everything they do in simple words that anyone can understand.

I have a design degree from the Stanford Product Design department, and I can assure you that this "design brief" is nothing more than the addled rantings of a witch doctor attempting to hoodwink a client.

February 12, 2009 at 12:53pm by vic donati

This document reads like a desperate justification of the terrible new Pepsi identity - A million dollar document for a 10 cent logo. The arguments presented get progressively more hilarious with each page turn - you can almost hear the creators laughing at the idea that they might get away with this - AND THEY DID! It looks like they had a team of interns research the golden mean on google over a weekend - and then spun it into this insanity! A masterful pile of BS for those who would feast on it. If the identity were judged on its own merit - the best it could hope for is "winking ball"

February 12, 2009 at 5:18pm by Meir Moses

BS it may be - but these guys have got serious cojones.

February 12, 2009 at 9:03pm by Johnny Nascar

Mr. Perry-Zucker, thank you for this post. I was delighted to see it weeks after I saw it EVERYWHERE ELSE ON THE DESIGN BLOGOSPHERE.

Also way to lift so many of your "observations" from the comments on sites like Brand New... clever.

February 20, 2009 at 12:25am by david zotter

reminds me of a fat guy every time i look at it:http://blowatlife.blogspot.com/2009/02/pepsi-logo-response.html

February 28, 2009 at 3:43am by Ann Stringer

Positively the funniest brand brief I have ever read. Sadly, it's not a joke.

Should be required reading for all design students and in biz school branding classes. Link to download the entire brief is at the bottom of the article.

July 26, 2009 at 3:12am by Lemo Jhon

We live in an ever changing society and brands, corporations and images all have to change right with it funny cats. I agree that Pepsi should have went in this direction with their brand. I'm assuming that there are trying to capture the attention of a new, younger audience. As a member of that younger generation national institute of health, a logo such as this would catch my eye and in turn make me wonder "they changed the look, what about the taste". Quite possibly, prompting me to try Pepsi.

August 7, 2009 at 5:28pm by amanda holis

Wow, I didn't know to what extent these big companies go crazy with the psychology behind their logo designs! I've been going through my own online logo design process, but I'm definitely not going the mad scientist route like these guys!

September 27, 2009 at 2:38pm by Nensi shuan

Almost all input is given through the touch screen, which understands complex gestures using multi-touch online payments. The iPhone's interaction techniques enable the user to move the content up or down by a touch-drag motion of the finger. For example, zooming in and out of web pages and photos is done by placing two fingers on the screen and spreading them farther apart or bringing them closer together, a gesture known as "pinching" web design services. Scrolling through a long list or menu is achieved by sliding a finger over the display from bottom to top, or vice versa to go back. In either case, the list moves as if it is pasted on the outer surface of a wheel, slowly decelerating as if affected by friction. In this way, the interface simulates the physics of a real object. Other user-centered interactive effects include horizontally sliding sub-selection, the vertically sliding keyboard and bookmarks menu, and widgets that turn around to allow settings to be configured on the other side. Menu bars are found at the top and bottom of the screen when necessary. Their options vary by program wireless broadband, but always follow a consistent style motif. In menu hierarchies, a "back" button in the top-left corner of the screen displays the name of the parent folder.The iPhone allows audio conferencing, call holding, call merging, caller ID, and integration with other cellular network features and iPhone functions. For example, if a song is playing while a call is received, it gradually fades out, and fades back when the call has ended internet service providers. The proximity sensor shuts off the screen and touch-sensitive circuitry when the iPhone is brought close to the face, both to save battery and prevent unintentional touches. This iPhone does not support video calling, and the first two models only supported voice dialing through third party applications.Voice control, available only on the iPhone 3GS, allows users to say a contact's name or number and the iPhone will dial.

September 30, 2009 at 5:37am by Smith William

Should be required reading for all design students and in biz school branding classes. Link to download the entire brief is at the bottom of the article.
Dissertation | Thesis | book report help

September 30, 2009 at 5:38am by Smith William

The arguments presented get progressively more hilarious with each page turn - you can almost hear the creators laughing at the idea that they might get away with this - AND THEY DID! It looks like they had a team of interns research the golden mean on google over a weekend - and then spun it into this insanity! A masterful pile of BS for those who would feast on it. If the identity were judged on its own merit - the best it could hope for is "winking ball"
Research Paper | research writing

October 28, 2009 at 5:23pm by Matthew Jones

Truly a brillant designer! Clearly there is intellegent life on planet Pepsi.