East Coast Blogging by Jimmy Gardner

11:40 am | 0 recommendations | Be the first to comment

Silicon Valley: Arrington’s Twisted View

Yes we all know it is true, when we think "Start Up" we think Silicon Valley. There is no argument there. Here at East Coast Blogging, we often wade in and ponder this what's and why's that make the valley such a special place. We also look at the other areas that are smaller, yet very good tech hubs where startups seem to gravitate and thrive.

I was reading my feeds and came across Michael Arrington's response post to a post by Glenn Kelman, CEO of RedFin. Glenn's point was


None of us thinks Seattle is ever going to be much like Silicon Valley. We believe instead that what other cities can learn from Seattle is how to be different than the Valley, not the same.

It is a good post and I invite you all to go check it out. But this post is not about his post, rather the Arrington response. More specifically, one statement he makes in the post


But the best of the best come to Silicon Valley to see if they’re as good as the legends that came before them. It’s a competitive advantage to be here. And if you aren’t willing to take advantage of every possible advantage to make your crazy startup idea work, perhaps you shouldn’t be an entrepreneur.

I have one question (and excuse my language) but who the hell does Michael Arrington think he is? I will give him the first thought , I agree, there is definitely an advantage to being in the valley. But honestly, who is he to question peoples motives and abilities to be entrepreneurs ? Does he have some insight into the will and motivation of people scattered across the world who have great ideas and are working to build something of them ? No he does not. There is not a cookie cutter for an entrepreneur. Some have time and resources to dedicate and maybe move to the valley, but others like myself, have a family, a sound job, and roots in the areas we currently reside in, and we have to make do with the resources available to us. How dare he question peoples will ? Sure I have the will, Ann Bernard certainly has will, as do the thousands of other out there who have a passion for their ideas and are striving to reach their goals. Michael Arrington does very well to show his true colors and prove what many call his over arrogance.

Michael, I am an entrepreneur. I may not live in the Valley, that promised land you seem to have ordained yourself "god" of out there, but I will do what I can to make my ideas come to life. Is entrepreneurship about a location ? No. It is all about people working on their dreams, and in my dream the background is the Capitol, the White House, and the Smithsonian, not an arid valley in central California.

 

Reposted from East Coast Blogging

Recommend This

Recommend This If you liked this, let others know:

05:01 pm | 0 recommendations | 7 comments

Does Social Media Make You Less Social

Just as I was thinking that this Social Media phenomena was actually making me more social, along came this post by Bill Cammack over on FastCompany's new website, which I am liking a lot .. but a post is forthcoming on that soon.
Bill was interviewed by Jonny Goldstein
on his Par-tay and his response to Jonny's question as to whether or
not he thought social media made people more social was it does not.
Bill said :

My point was that I became less social instead of more social because
of the fact that my friends are always at my fingertips. For the sake
of this post, I'm defining "social" as actually going somewhere to hang
out with friends of mine, IRL.

Jonny actually thinks that it can lead to more actual social
interaction and I agree with him. Seeing as I met Jonny through a
mutual twitter friend and have since started watching his show
regularly and seen him in actual person on several occasions it only
leads to reason. Had I not been using these new social media tools, I
would have never had the pleasure of not only meeting him, but a whole
slew of other great people in the local DC area here.

Bill makes some interesting points

There's no reason for me to physically go ANYWHERE unless physically
interacting with that person is the reason I'm going. You can't go
snowboarding together unless you actually go snowboarding. Other than
that, the current state of communications enables you to be AS in-touch
with someone as you want to be ...

I think that more often, social media allows us to FEIGN getting together, which is actually *less* social than more so.

but i tend to disagree with most of them, especially that last one
there. I think that once you find your niche in these social tools,
like Twitter, it leads to some really interesting real life social
interactions. The fact that I have some background on the people I
have found really makes the real life meeting that much easier and more
comfortable. Meeting people "cold" is not easy, but when you have that
online rapport already established it helps the transition. Then once
you have a base of these "online"/"offline" friends the tentacles
spread out from there and you meet the friend of one of your friends
and so on. Here is an irony for you, now when I meet these peripheral
friends, if you will, I go online later and start following them, and
the cycle starts again.

In my opinion, my foray into social media has led to some great
contacts, good friends, and thet start of a burgeoning tech culture
here in the DC area.

So what do you all think, does social media make you more social ?

Recommend This

Recommend This If you liked this, let others know:

Syndicate content