RSS Feed An Itinerant Mind

1:09 pm | 0 recommendations | 7 comments

ROI? Not With Those Ads You Won't...

| posted by Saabira Chaudhuri

I'm one of those people who don't appreciate commercials. They annoy me and, for the most part, I think they're a waste of money on the advertiser's part and definitely a waste of time for me. If there's a commercial on, I usually just change the channel. Print advertising can be slightly better, but that too I generally don't bother to even glance at.

I remember a statistic from a media class I took at the London School of Economics: only 2% of advertising has actually been found to have a demonstrable effect on consumer purchasing. Whether this statistic actually holds any weight or not, advertising can be damn expensive, and the returns often just aren't proportional.

What really flummoxes me is those advertisements that assume you know what they're for so that they offer you nothing but an ambiguous name attached to an esoteric image. Maybe they're banking on you to be curious enough to Google them as soon as you're near a computer. I for one always forget.

So, being the skeptic towards glib marketing efforts that I am, when there's a commercial or a campaign that I take notice of, it sticks with me. Quirky, powerful, containing an element of surprise or originality, and capable of eliciting emotion or a connection of sorts… That's what I think good advertising is.

A commercial for affordable dental coverage by the freelancer's union recently caught my eye. The ad shows a designer giving a presentation when her teeth begin falling out one by one. The tagline: "People pay more attention to the words coming out of your mouth. When teeth aren't falling out of it at the same time."

Another campaign, some years old now, that really grabbed my attention was a particularly powerful series of commercials aimed at getting smokers to quit.

Pretty much everyone I've asked remembers this commercial: it's a series of shots of body parts sticking out of garbage cans. The commercial is so effective because it isn't afraid to be a hard hitter. Initially the viewer is both horrified and puzzled – there's no logical explanation for what this could be a commercial for (unless it's by the disgruntled Department of Sanitation.) And so you stay, riveted, until you're provided with an explanation at the end: "Every month tobacco kills more Americans than there are public garbage cans in New York city."

A recent public service campaign by the New York University Child Study Center that aims to raise awareness about "the silent public health epidemic of children's mental illness" also grabbed my attention.

Controversial "ransom notes" say things like: "We are in possession of your son. We are making his squirm and fidget until he is a detriment to himself and those around him. Ignore this and your kid will pay – ADHD," and "We have your son. We will make sure he will no longer be able to care for himself or interact socially as long as he lives – Autism."

ADHD.jpg

The campaign's primary premise is that 12 million children are "held hostage" by a psychiatric disorder. The advertisements, which appear in NewsWeek, New York Magazine, on billboards and other places around the city, have stirred up enough controversy to ensure that their message, although contested, cannot be ignored.

Critics say that the campaign is harmful and misleading, reinforcing negative stereotypes about autism, ADHD and other conditions. The Center's defense for its decision to continue running the advertisement: politically correct and uncontroversial were getting them nowhere-.

I for one think that the campaign is already something of a success. Yes it's controversial to depict a child with ADHD as a "hostage" of his condition, but it's attention grabbing, it raises awareness and it’s making people sit up and listen.

If you haven't been around forever, you don't have as much money as a companies like Coke or Pepsi (who bombard consumers with brand messages so hard and consistently that it's a wonder the subconscious hasn't caved under attack), distinguishing yourself, making people care, and making them remember who you are can be tough. Before you agree to pony up thousands for a pretty face, a catchy tune or just the services of one more run of the mill advertising firm, make sure you think about how effective your portrayal of your brand message is within the already over crowded space that is the consumer's mind.

Comment

Recent Comments | 7 Total

December 18, 2007 at 9:31pm

abfh

Sadly, you're right that many people nowadays view "attention grabbing" as the sole measure of a successful ad campaign. They don't care how many nasty stereotypes they spread about vulnerable minority groups or how much harm they do to children with disabilities.

For those who find the Ransom Notes ads as despicable as I do, here's a link to an online petition calling for their removal:

http://www.petitiononline.com/ransom/petition.html

December 19, 2007 at 12:55am

culvercitycynic

Re: Ransom Notes
Why is "raising awareness" seen as the end goal? With the way you are representing those who are somewhat different, the only awareness that will be raised is that of the bigoted kind.

December 19, 2007 at 2:00pm

monak

The key to advertising is the brand message, which takes a consistant and strategic marketing plan- sometimes involving lots of money- always involving creative marketing from inside the store or business to outside with the public.

January 4, 2008 at 5:54pm

A.B. Citizen

Culvercitycynic has a good question! The end goal is actually increased sales of pharmaceutical concoctions designed to alleviate the symptoms of these "disorders." The more people who are aware that their kids have disorders, the more money the psychiatrists and BigPharma make--even if it means SELLing you the IDEA that your kid is at risk. The more drugs they can push on the public--needed or not, the more docile we become. More docile becomes more controllable, suggestible. Include some tyranny via some well-crafted Executive Orders and Presidential Directives; add a cup of Terror, and voila! Fascist Dictatorship.

Watch. Soon, they'll have a drug to cure my suspicion of government. Until then I'm just a nut case. Remember "Female Hysteria"? Look up the etymology of that. Learn something today.

January 10, 2008 at 10:54am

Susan Jensen

politically correct and uncontroversial were getting them nowhere-
distinguishing yourself, making people care, and making them remember who you are can be tough.

Maybe the reason we don't see more break through advertising is that ad agencies thrive on client spending. It's the media department that brings in the dollars. Successful case studies can help gain more clients but it's not really in the agencies best interest to create ads that work so well their clients no longer need them.

January 21, 2008 at 2:30am

David Wen

I'd like to throw two questions out there.

Do you think the lack of breakthrough advertising resides with the marketers or the ad agencies?

Is there really an accurate way to measure the effect of advertising?

April 16, 2008 at 10:25am

Greg Robertson

Saabira, you're absolutely right to say that there's a lot of REALLY bad advertising out there that should be cast aside. As owner of an ad agency, and a developer of advertising for 25 years, it annoys me, too. And I STRONGLY suggest that any company that thinks their advertising isn't getting the results they want should stop and regroup before one more dollar is wasted. Advertising is a tool, so if it isn't working, shut it down now, the way you would shut down a faulty conveyor belt or stamping machine. It's not worth it to be poorly represented in the marketplace.

Then fix the situation. If you are a marketer, you should DEMAND better, smarter work from your ad agency. They are supposed to be your partner, so treat them like one, and make them get you the results you need. A good ad agency will WANT you to want that from them.

That said, keep in mind that there's also a lot of really bad architecture out there that also deserves scorn, as well as a lot of bad retail store concepts, bad and boring clothing designs, and so on. And in each category, there are pros who are focused on doing great work and there are semi-pros who are just trying to make a buck. Go for the ad agency who is out to do well for itself by doing a higher level of work for its clients.

Comment