RSS

Green Fashion: Is It More Than Marketing Hype?

By: Gloria SinWed May 28, 2008 at 9:05 PM
green-fashion1.jpg

Green fashion is giving the fashion industry an eco-makeover. But is green its true color?

Related Content


The zebra-like, black-and-white, elongated shrug keeps disappearing from the rack at the flagship Barneys New York store on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan. To customers, the incredibly soft and warmer-than-wool sweater is a must-have, even though most have no idea what the hangtag means by "Alpaca" or "Rogan."

Rogan is actually an avant-garde line by Rogan Gregory, whose various ventures -- from denim to furniture -- are businesses with an eco-friendly bent. The designer is best known for his high-end organic denim line Loomstate, and his collaboration with rockstar Bono's Edun collection.

Made of fur from free-range Alpacas (multicolor, sheep-like llama cousins, native to Peru) handspun into yarn, Gregory's popular sweater is knit with naturally black and white yarn so no toxic dyes are used to achieve its two-tone look. With herders continuingly breeding out the non-white species due to underwhelming demand (white fleece is easier to dye and therefore more commercially viable), Gregory uses the sweater to bring awareness to this inhumane practice as part of his "Save Our Colored Brother" campaign.

This sweater, and not some burlap sac rescued from the trash can by granola-eating hippies, is the essence of green fashion. What sets eco-fashion apart from conventionally produced garments is the environmental, ethical and even social considerations weaved into the design of each piece. It can be as simple as using a sustainable fabric like organic cotton and donating proceeds to an earth-friendly charity, or as extensive as providing ethical employment to offshore factory workers. Across the entire fashion spectrum, from accessories to haute couture, designers are finding ways to incorporate their green lifestyles into their work.

Of course, not every brand is as considerate of its eco-impact as Rogan. Without any certification or governing bodies overseeing the greening of the fashion industry, any label with any degree of eco-ambition can color itself, well, green. This means companies that use recycled paper hangtags are on the same eco-platform as those running on wind-power. For example, Banana Republic recently launched a 50-piece green collection. The pieces push all the right buttons -- their 100 percent recycled paper price tags have names like "Bamboo Printed Wrap" and "Leaf Tee" -- but as may often be the case, the actual clothing may not be made in an eco-friendly production process or even from sustainable materials. Besides, would the average shopper at the local mall even know the difference?

"It's a catch 22," says Alice Demirijian, Director of Fashion Marketing at Parsons at The New School. "To be truly sustainable is to buy less." Designers are well aware they need to educate consumers to make a business out of sustainable fashion. Not only do they need to differentiate themselves from other green designers (especially from eco-posers), and spread the word about the virtues of greening the industry, they also need to compete with non-eco-products, which tend to be more reasonably priced. This is why marketing is key for these labels. But there is a difference between informing customers and outright fibbing about environmental claims, also known as greenwashing. According to many environmentalists and critics of this practice, marketers often employ tactics that paint products greener than they actually are.

As more and more mass retailers like Wal-Mart and the Gap jump on the green fashion bandwagon, they're looking to established indie labels for direction and inspiration. greenKarat jewelry, Olivia Luca couture, and Mink shoes may not be household names, but their success is proving to mainstream brands that going green is good for business.

greenKarat

Back in 2003 when he co-founded greenKarat, the ecologically and socially responsible jeweler and CEO, Matt White, didn't know a whole lot about jewelry-making. But as a CPA, he knew the numbers in the gold-mining industry didn't add up. "Two thousand five hundred tons of gold is mined each year, even though there is already enough idle gold above ground to satisfy the jewelry industry for the next 50 years," White says. This is why his company makes a point of using only recycled gold and other metals in made-to-order pieces. In fact, the myKarat recycling program provides store credit in exchange for gold jewelry for melting.

Likewise, baubles in greenKarat designs only reuse stones -- or they make their own. Using heat and pressure to simulate the conditions under which Mother Nature produces diamonds and other rocks, created gems are as real as the naturals because they share the same chemical makeup. In White's opinion, lab-grown gems should eliminate the need for mining that harms both the environment and miners.

Though White has noticed an explosion of new green jewelers this year, he's concerned most of his competitors, don't disclose their products' origins even though they're working under the same limitations. greenKarat customers get a detailed report tracing their purchase's history, including the not so eco-friendly parts. While brick-and-mortar stores are interested in carrying his work, he is wary of potential pitfalls. "There's a lot of greenwashing out there,” he says. “By selling only through our website, at least I can control the message and try to educate consumers about their purchases."

May 2008

Sign in or register to comment.
or

Recent Comments | 9 Total

May 29, 2008 at 10:57am by Michael De'Shazer

Complete marketing hype. It makes the sales. They are drawing on the newly-found sensibilities of a culture of green freaks. Thank you Gore. This is not sarcastic. Im really happy about all this, although I'm wondering how "going green" as a culture is becoming a bit of a pretentious group of Chai-Latte toting Fifth Avenuers and Suburban housewives...

May 29, 2008 at 2:02pm by Nicole Valentino

Maybe 5 or 10 years ago being green was only for pretentious latte drinkers, but today, anyone can get in on the deal, which is great. If Barney's is carrying a line of green fashions, more power to them. Anyway, are chai-latte's still pretentious?

May 29, 2008 at 2:41pm by Darren Shield

Sure for some of the big players it might just be hype for now, but I think the shift to a strong environmental conciousness on a global level that is spurring this capitilization will drive this to become a fundamental shift for the fashion industry. If the designers and consumers are on board, the decision makers will have to take notice... if they themselves aren't swayed by the green revolution themselves!

May 30, 2008 at 12:44am by Jo Nelgadde

I actually think "green fashion" awaiting a backlash very soon. This is akin to biofuels once embraced by environmentalists and green-wannabes alike and touted as good for the people. Now biofuels are bearing the brunt of the anger felt by many who feel that they're making the already-bad global foos crisis even worse. Million of people are starving and food which can feed them is instead being used to make fuel (which really hasn't proven to be THAT cost-effective and environmentally friendly). Same goes for green-fashion. Same food which could go to feeding those millions is instead used to make some clothes??? This defies global social responsibility and very ironic.

May 31, 2008 at 4:58am by Darren Shield

I don't think the analogy fits. "Green" is a very broad appellation being attached to many things. Green fashion isn't about switching to a scare commodity, its about sustainability. Instead of growing cotton, grow hemp or bamboo (that farm is just switching what its producing), or like greenKarat, aiming at recycling existing material instead of going out and mining more gold. I fail to see where the backlash will come from. Sure there may be some unforeseen counter-productive results as there were with biofuels, but its certainly not the removal of already scare material.

June 1, 2008 at 2:22pm by Marianne Bellotti

I'm not sure how accurate that information about biofuels is in the first place. US corn is federally subsidized, if it wasn't being used to make fuel it wouldn't go to starving people it would be used to make corn syrup to pack in US processed foods or it wouldn't be grown at all.

That aside, the biggest problem for green fashion is that fashion is inherently shallow and right now green fashions are all bland basics. Mink shoes looks cool, you could easily see a company like Steve Madden picking something like that up, and the Olivia Luca site was very entertaining.

...But at the end of the day, if a woman is going to drop $400 on a dress she wants it to be something everyone in the room is going to turn around and go "WOW!" to.

October 27, 2008 at 3:18pm by Jacob Eberhart

July 30, 2009 at 3:44am by Carl Haufman

I think it is more than just marketing hype, as usual people jumping on the bandwagon. I think that if you go back to the source and followed the production of an item from start to finish you will probably end up with the same carbon footprint for each product.

I also see that America and the UK are not the only countries embracing green culture.

Green Clothing in Asia and earth friendly clothing in Australia

Everyone will get bored and move on soon, it will be green toilets before we know it!

November 20, 2009 at 10:30am by Fiona Robbins

Green fashion will only become mainstream if it can be made as easy to look after and wear as today's dresses, and as stylish. If not, it will become just another fad.