RSS

Memo to Brands: Surrender

By: Anni Layne RodgersWed Dec 19, 2007 at 8:41 AM
Permission marketing has deteriorated into spam, TiVo is killing the 30-second ad, and no one trusts corporate America. Could there be a more challenging -- and thrilling -- time to work in marketing? Branding guru Laurie Coots doubts it.

Don't kill your television. Just paralyze it. Choke off its influence, smother its authority, and reclaim control over your evenings, Saturday mornings, and bathroom breaks.

That is the directive from TiVo central, where technology is rendering the 30-second television ad impotent. Empowered viewers armed with digital video recorders are zapping through Academy Award speeches, opening credits, and thousands of TV commercials -- giggling all the way. And that is only the beginning of the end, says Laurie Coots, chief marketing officer at TBWA\Chiat\Day.

Disruptive advertising is on the way out. And replacing the one-way conversation of pop-up ads and radio spots will be a marketing dialogue between brands and consumers that crosses every channel and grows over time.

"Consumers have all the power now, and they want more from a brand relationship," says Coots, who contributed a chapter to Beyond Disruption: Changing the Rules In the Marketplace (John Wiley & Sons, 2002). "Consumers only allow a small repertoire of brands into their lives, and they want the relationships with those brands to be meaningful. The stakes are a lot higher for marketers now."

Still, most marketers don't get it. They "cling to practices designed for an outdated scenario," Coots writes in Beyond Disruption, arguing that most tools of measurement and acquisition "revolve almost solely around today's volume moved and not tomorrow's value created." Branding is not about communicating a message; it's about engaging in a relationship. And that isn't easy, especially in a marketplace dominated by distrust, anxiety, and scandal. (Thanks again, Enron.)

Here, Coots outlines the biggest challenges facing marketers today and offers best practices from companies that are doing something right. Next month, she will explain how to build an engaging brand for hypervigilant consumers at Fast Company's signature event, in San Diego: RealTime.

Permission Abuse

"The abuse of permission marketing is deplorable," Coots says. "Marketers today are saying, 'If you don't explicitly deny me permission, that means I have free reign to bombard you with messages.' But consumers are getting smart and shutting that down."

It is no longer enough for a brand simply to request permission from a consumer. It must also grant permission -- invite consumers to tamper, tinker, and communicate with the brand any way they wish. That "requires the fundamental surrender of power from the company to the customer," Coots writes. Marketers must relinquish control in order to perpetuate meaningful relationships.

"BMW is a really good example of a brand that knew itself well enough to hand over control to five very creative directors," Coots says of the BMW films project that turned the advertising community on its head last year. "And BMW ended up with five pieces of entertainment that absolutely communicate the brand values without deteriorating into any silliness or craziness. It was a brilliant strategy."

Another TBWA client, the Infiniti Division of Nissan North America Inc., engaged its consumers in a unique branding experience as well. In 1999, it launched a permission-based advergame called the I30 Challenge, which gave each player $29,465 (the value of a new Infiniti I30) in imaginary money to invest and manage over three months. The player with the highest-valued portfolio at the end of the game won a new I30.

"The longer someone played the game, the more likely they were to win, so it was a great way for Infiniti to communicate regularly and deepen its relationship with consumers," Coots says. "The pay-off was great, but the responsibility was huge. If you deliver a game that's uninteresting over time or that clashes with the brand identity, people will call 'fraud,' drop you, and never come back. You cannot violate their trust."

Email Overload

"The days of the e-mail hyperlink quickie sale are severely numbered," Coots writes, suggesting that spam may soon give way to smarter, more-targeted email communications. On Amazon.com, it already has.

A devoted Amazon shopper, Coots receives a weekly email from Bezos and Co. that recommends best-selling titles, hot new albums, and sale items that match Coots's unique interests -- as demonstrated by her past purchases. "It's like having a friend who's always looking out for you," Coots says about the email dispatches. "Amazon feeds me the ability to support my interests."

March 2002

Sign in or register to comment.
or