Click here to preview the new Fast Company

Want to try out the new FastCompany.com?

If you’d like to return to the previous design, click the yellow button on the lower left corner.

(Trade)Marked for Life?

The Aveda Corp., which I usually view as an upstanding member of the corporate community, has seemingly trademarked the word "indigenous" for their purifying collection.

In a message to the Nettime mailing list, Felix Stalder expresses concern about the trademark, inquiring whether such a filing is legal.

Personally, I'm not sure. The trademark might just mean that the term can't be used to label a product line produced by a competitor. I'm not sure whether the Maori need to be concerned — or that Fast Company's trademarks indicate that a popular athlete's foot remedy needs to start billing itself as "quickly actin'."

Add New Comment

2 Comments

  • Heath Row

    Thanks for the clarification! I figured it was a competitive product naming thing.

  • James S. Williams

    Yes, it's legal. It doesn't mean that no one else can use the word. It only means that "indigenous" cannot be subsequently used by another person/company to identify a product that is confusingly similar to Aveda's. Also, the company does not yet have the mark registered. It must still go through a 2 month publication period, during which time the application can be opposed.