Why You Should Do More Than Just Talk About Workplace Diversity

Even big names like Google now acknowledge their struggles with diversity. Here's how to make meaningful changes in the way we hire.

Google recently disclosed its unsurprising lack of employee diversity, reporting that its staff is 70% male and 61% white.

In a blog post about their diversity efforts, Google’s SVP of People Operations Laszlo Bock provided some details on how they plan to build a more diverse workforce—like working with historically black colleges to build more robust computer science programs, for example.

These proactive efforts to build diversity are becoming more common, and we’re even seeing a number of trailblazing organizations tie executives’ bonuses to diversity goals. For example, Sodexo, ranked second on DiversityInc’s Top 50 survey, ties 25% of top executives’ bonuses and up to 15% of senior management’s bonuses to diversity goals.

As more and more companies publicly commit to building diversity, they’ll encounter a classic supply and demand dilemma. The demand for diverse talent will surge, but the supply won’t.

Minorities continue to make up a fraction of educated, qualified candidates. Of the students obtaining bachelor’s degrees each year, about 80% are white. White employees are much more likely to be on a career trajectory toward senior management or executive leadership. And, as Google pointed out, this will be an even bigger problem for companies that rely on expertise in engineering and science, since women make up only 18% of graduates with computer science degrees and Blacks and Hispanics make up less than 10% each.

If employers blindly attack the limited pool of diverse talent without a proactive diversity-building strategy, they’ll fall victim to one of these common pitfalls:

1. Becoming a Revolving Door for Recent Grads

When employers embark on diversity and inclusion initiatives, they often bring in diverse entry-level talent and think their work is done. But this approach backfires when young, diverse talent sees a leadership team consisting of primarily white men. Unable to see themselves growing with the company, they’ll plan an exit strategy.

2. Forgetting about the Inclusion part

Employers tend to ignore inclusion, focusing on talent acquisition but failing to develop an internal culture that embraces diversity. The result is expensive, productivity-sucking employee turnover and a culture that develops a reputation for exclusion, further perpetuating the problem.

3. Making it an “HR Problem”

Corporate leaders ask HR managers to identify diverse candidates, assuming that Diversity & Inclusion is a single initiative handled by recruiters. But to achieve sustained diversity, there must be a number of simultaneous, coordinated efforts across the company that should involve multiple departments and all levels of staff.

To create enduring diversity, organizations must implement proactive, long-term strategies that span the talent management cycle.

The first step towards achieving an inclusive workforce requires developing a pipeline of diverse candidates that spans a broad spectrum of experience levels, enabling companies to fill both junior- and senior-level vacancies when they arise.

But retention is just as important as recruitment. To make sure diverse talent sticks around, organizations must foster a culture of inclusion that prioritizes acceptance, makes room for varied backgrounds and perspectives, and, most importantly, trains all incoming employees on this core value.

Employers must also establish clear career paths and train new hires on their potential trajectories, helping employees see the company as a place to grow, not a stepping-stone to something bigger and better. Likewise, leadership should assess existing employees on relevant competencies to identify future leaders.

Corporations should likewise take a close look at their recognition and rewards system, examining how they recognize employees that meet objectives and confirming that the methods are aligned with professional development strategies.

Employers should also be aware that, as baby boomers retire, they have the opportunity to add diversity on the tail end of the employee lifecycle. Leadership should engage in a succession management process—sponsoring and mentoring future leaders, preparing them for a potential promotion, and encouraging diverse candidates to express their interest.

These efforts will be particularly effective with team members from traditionally underrepresented groups who, according to research from Catalyst, are more likely to succeed—in terms of engagement, retention, and promotions—with mentorship.

Finally, all organizations must abandon the idea that “Diversity & Inclusion” is an isolated HR project. Cross-departmental efforts could include partnering with universities to develop talent sources, creating employee teams to discuss and promote inclusion, or studying the customer base to ensure its diversity is reflected internally.

In the wake of Google’s disclosures, a number of corporations will publicly commit to diversity building. And while it’s unfortunate that it requires a PR incentive, building diversity is an effective method of fostering innovation and, ultimately, success within a company.

We see evidence of this all the time—a recent Bloomberg article showed how a group of diverse MBA candidates was able to outperform more homogenous student groups because they thought outside of the box on a service-learning project in South Africa. In their report, “Talent at the Table: Index of Women in Power and Utilities,” EY found that global power and utility companies with high diversity scores realize a return on equity (ROE) of 7.5%, while those with less diversity see an ROE of only 4.5%.

It’s important to acknowledge that diversity building is a proven growth strategy, not a superficial endeavor. But paying lip service to diversity and inclusion without a proactive strategy will lead to failure. Organizations need to prioritize, collaborate, and think long term.

Susan Medina and Peter Gomez lead the Diversity Practice at Battalia Winston, a leading executive search firm. Their unique practice represents both a broad range of industry and functional expertise. They have most recently helped organizations such as W.W. Grainger, Baxter, Coca-Cola, and Whirlpool. Collectively, their team has over 30 years of experience helping clients build and retain diverse leadership teams.

Add New Comment

2 Comments

  • thombs.thumbs

    BUUUUUULLLLLLLLSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTT! Um Yeah, sorry, but 50+ years of Affirmative Action history shows this concept to be faulty. I'll call bullshit on your RoE numbers too. I'd love to hear the metrics used to determine those figures directly attributable to diversity.

    Listen success transcends racial/sexual/religious boundaries, the last time someone was/was not hired because they were ANY brand of minority was decades ago, you now advocating for them to be hired BECAUSE of their minority status is the most insulting brand of hypocrisy. How about companies continue to hire the most qualified personnel irrespective of color/creed/orientation and let Darwin's Theory sort the performance ashes.

  • astridruiz

    You are missing one critical point the article is making - DIVERSITY BUILDING-. "Minorities continue to make up a fraction of educated, qualified candidates. Of the students obtaining bachelor’s degrees each year, about 80% are white". Who do you think will get a bigger of chance of benefiting from your idea of " companies continuing to hire the most qualified personnel...."???? It seems that as you continue to advocate for Darwin's Theory, you should also learn about structural racism, critical race theory and OTHER theories that will provide additional tools for you not to dismiss so quickly the challenges and opportunities organizations and society face when "just talking diversity". Hats off to companies not just talking, but BUILDING it.