3 New Job Titles Every Company Needs But No One Has Yet

What would happen if businesses introduced new positions dedicated completely to imagining new ways to shake things up? Here's what that might look like.

Two issues seem to be severely afflicting corporations today: how to survive gracefully in this uncongenial business environment and how to sustain leadership amidst growing competition, not to mention disenchanted customers.

Together, both problems account for CEOs’ truncated tenures, firings, and frequent successions.

CEOs need support for these issues from their core executive team, but today’s team is at best geared to deal with what’s happening today or in the near future, not what will happen in the distant future.

Here are three roles that every CEO should introduce to get the support they need:

Chief Reimagination Officer (CRO)

Also known as the "Crystal Ball Gazer," the CRO’s primary job is to reimagine issues, internal as well as external, and translate the abstracts into concrete actionables.

Your CRO should focus on identifying the organizational slack that needs picking up, reimagine how and where opportunities will manifest, how customer insights need to be captured, how business planning needs to change, how employees need to be engaged differently, and how risks need to be mitigated.

Through this endless list, the corporate way of thinking, doing, and learning needs to be reimagined.

The key responsibilities of CRO should be:

  • Sensing behaviors and attitudes that are getting stale
  • Observing patterns that are becoming outdated
  • Identifying inefficiencies building in the system
  • Picking up mindsets that are limiting and not expanding
  • Capturing aura which is creating negativity

In essence, the CRO’s job is to craft strategic change agendas and draw the CEO and board’s attention to galvanizing powerful movements.

Chief Paradigm Officer

Prepare before you perish: Kodak, Research in Motion, and Nokia all ignored this powerful message and paid the price, either partially or completely.

These companies saw the writing on the wall, but they did not act proactively. Why? They could not embrace the paradigms on the horizon.

Identifying, tracking, and embracing new paradigms is a full-time job now, and the CEO or anyone else on his core team cannot do it single-handedly.

We need a Chief Paradigm Officer, whose primary job is to identify the emerging paradigms that can sweep organizations off their feet if ignored. He is essentially the CEO’s scout and must spot change, capture its essence, and alert the CEO to the potential dangers of overlooking them.

The key responsibilities of CPO should be:

  • Intuiting the unexpressed or unimagined aspirations of customers, stakeholders, and employees
  • Conjecturing the future extrapolations of emerging technologies, amidst vast array of industries and contexts
  • Integrative thinking to capture the tacit interplay between the latent aspirations and emerging technologies
  • Broad scanning of opportunities, challenges, and enablers that will bridge the gaps
  • Influencing and building conviction on emerging paradigms through analytical as well as anecdotal thought process, a critical aspect as they will have to deal with the left brainers as well as right brainers in building convictions

The CPOs will envision the potential synergies, cross-pollinations of practices, and technologies across industries to create new business propositions.

Chief Paradox Officer (CPXO)

Think of the conflict that the CEOs will have to face when the CROs are vying for their attention on how the organization needs to think, behave, and shape up. And on the other side the CPOs are trying to shift the CEO’s focus on the future for engendering response to the new paradigms.

This is breeding ground for paradoxes that consume significant bandwidth of top leadership. Most organizations will generally avoid such situations and will rather align with one over the other. But companies don’t really have the choice to land in a situation or avoid it. We are invariably led by market forces and changing contexts.

It is here that the CPXO comes in: it is her responsibility to balance the focus between reimagination and response to paradigms. Her job is to identify the exact paradox and articulate it in such a manner that the top leadership sees viable opportunities for growth rather than the distractions.

CPXOs can perfectly blend the perspectives of emerging paradigms and convert the paradoxes into opportunities for innovation. They need to create structures that can naturally apportion time, energy, and sponsorship of top leadership.

The key responsibilities of CPXOs should be:

  • Identifying paradoxes and managing the battles of attention, resources and sponsorship
  • Seeing a whole new range of possibilities that are relevant for current as well as future
  • Surfacing potentially dormant conflicts, which can later become deep-rooted
  • Unraveling contradictions and proactively ironing them out

These new roles are absolutely imperative to enable CEOs and boards to fight the war of competition and sustainability.

Such a federation can build a collective breath and holistic mindshare to embrace the paradigms and effectively deal with the paradoxes.

Himanshu Saxena is Vice President and Head of Strategy Alignment, Balanced Scorecard and Business Coach at Tata Consultancy Services.

[Image: Flickr user Eli Christman]

Add New Comment


  • Daniel Juvinao

    Not sure about CRO, I see this function more as an advisor with an external view of main situation on vision and mission company. Its better to re-align Risk, I+D and Business Planning responsible with empowerment into a clear knowledge about company situation based on IT information of market insights.

  • Burghard Petersen

    Himanshu - Great suggestions !! Unfortunately, it requires a lot of courage, convincing as well as disposition for companies to adopt these concepts. And as long as the necessity to continuously revise traditional concepts is not critical enough for survival and competitiveness, change won´t happen.
    Still, startups and young companies shall embrace these concepts right from the beginning to establish an adaptive business culture.

  • agenov2000

    These three sound like key current responsibilities of CEO's. CEO's today are make hugely wealthy and these responsibilities should justify that wealth.

  • agenov2000

    These all sounds like current roles of the CEO. CEO's are make super wealthy and these are key responsibilities to justify that wealth.

  • debbievanstraten

    Language forms your reality. Loved this article. Just starting a new company and these titles support my vision. Thank you so much Himanshu.

  • Sean Schofield

    Doesn't it raise the question that if you silo these activities you are essentially declaring that you don't expect anyone else to do this (or believe them capable of it)?

    What does this say about who is leading?

    Rather than create net new roles, perhaps the existing ones simply need to evolve? Or, broaden the conversation to include more than a few people in a tight circle at the top?

    I think there are a number of anecdotes to suggest the employees on the ground have critical insights. Less expertise and more exchange would probably help. If you hire smart people, engage their brains. If you don't, well, it begs other questions.

  • Samuel Hauptmann van Dam

    NO! Or sure......

    But my point is - This is what any one responsible for imagination does.

    All three of those things.

    They see near and far, finds spectrums

  • Alan Doulton

    Interesting new thought - Looks like you are soliciting a new corporate group under the banner of "Corporate Survival". At present this is very much the CEO's job in consultation with HR, Marketing and others. However I think your point is well taken because in today's environment the CEO needs to pay more attention to these areas - The market will get increasingly competitive in the near future. Thanks for the insight. Alan

  • Alan, I couldn't agree more. I think "inventing" new roles is just adding more chefs in the kitchen. I believe there's rather a need for new mindsets, structure and operating systems that allows the CEO to tap into existing roles like; CTO, CXO, HR and so forth. My concern is if companies are not already understanding and implementing the responsibilities of the roles describes, where are they heading (read: Blockbuster)? The CRO role is interesting and could add value, the other ones should already be incorporated in existing roles at most companies IMO.

  • It isn't immediately clear how one's performance would be measured and assessed in these roles since they seem to transcend the company's more common KPIs.

    Any thoughts on how to objectively evaluate hire well these new execs are performing their duties?

  • Adeyemi Olabode Effects Afolabi-Oni

    For these job titles a degree in Managerial psychology necessary?

  • Ranjan Bandyopadhyay

    This is really exciting. I also feel that "Chief Mindful/ness Officer" could be another role : the timeless and timely boundaries meeting might be a dichotomy today but would be tomorrows reality

  • Rashmi Choudhary

    Excellent thought provoking article. ...management has to think out of the box or be ready to pay the price. ...

  • Excellent ideas. Organizations tend to be so caught up in their own past success that they focus less on imaging the future. Just embracing these roles would indicate that an Organization is forward thinking.

  • Pat Renfro

    Your perspective on 3 new titles are so on point! I truly agree & found myself wondering what it would take to see these newly created roles emerge in industry. However, at some point 'Talent Management' emerged from career development. And Organization Development didn't exist 70 years ago. Thank you so much for putting it out there! The sooner companies perfect such roles & educational industries train students for it, the greater businesses' profit margins will be.

  • I'm reminded of an article in 2001 after the dot-com bust in late 2000 that said "last year's 'Chief Burn-Rate Officer' is this year's 'Chief Revenue Officer' ". It is still true today, but I like the variations in this article in how it evolves the conversation to be forward-focused.

    Kevin Stark, NineSigma