If you've spent any time wondering at what makes people successful, you've probably come across 'the 10,000 Rule,' popularized by Malcolm Gladwell in Outliers. Put roughly, the rule posits that after 10,000 hours of working at a skill--coding, tweeting, dancing--you'll become an expert. But research suggests that the rule has a major misconception: to become awesome at a skill, it's not about quantity of time spent, it's about quality.
Harvard psychologist and Emotional Intelligence author Daniel Goleman helps us to see why. In his new book Focus: the Hidden Driver of Excellence, he says:
(The 10,000-hour rule is) only half true. If you are a duffer at golf, say, and make the same mistakes every time you try a certain swing or putt, 10,000 hours of practicing that error will not improve your game. You’ll still be a duffer, albeit an older one.
As noted at Brain Pickings, the key, then, is to identify the drivers that actually improve that quality of the time we spend trying to get better--like changing the way we practice, recalibrating our concentration, and making room for recovery. Here's how to know if you are actually improving at a skill:
Psychologists and productivity nerds obsess over deliberate practice: the kind of practice where you're pushing right against the boundaries of your ability.
The amateur pianist will sit down and play the songs that are easy for them to succeed at, which makes their practice more fun. The professional however, will work on the parts she's struggling with, even though there's way more difficulty involved.
Feedback has been called "the essence of intelligence." So if we want to be smart about deliberate practice, we need to structure ourselves for feedback. A lot of this depends on the environment: if you're a ballet dancer, for instance, you can get feedback from a mirror. But where in an office can we find such reflections?
Often it's in the metrics. If you create content for the web, then you've been schooled in responding to the rhythm of pageviews and unique visitors, which provide a quasi-tyrannical force of feedback. Other options are less mechanical: a human who can evaluate your work and point out your spots for improvement is invaluable, be they mentor, sponsor, or coach.
"Every world-class sports champion has a coach," Goleman says. So maybe we should too.
Some people (like this writer) who grew up in flat parts of the country are terrified by things like skiing, because mountains are steep. Goleman provides hope for us, as after about 50 hours of practice with a skill like skiing, we can reach "good enough" levels of performance, allowing us to go through the motions without falling on our faces.
This, too, presents a problem: if we stick in that pleasant "good enough" spot, we're not going to get any better. So even if we put 10,000 hours of time into the slopes, we won't be getting anywhere near Sochi.
The quality of the attention that we give to an activity is a major theme within Focus. To truly do deliberate practice, we need to be able to give it our best attention. The problem, however, is that we can only sustain attention for so long until we get fatigued--like the decisions we make throughout the day.
Thus the need for rest. Our practicing happens in our brains which happen to be a part of our bodies, which means that we need to allow ourselves the space to recover. Like Tim Ferriss, the author of the 4 Hour Workweek, told us:
You need stimulus and recovery in mental work in the same way that you need stimulus and recovery for sports. Just as you have physical over-training in the weight room, there is mental over-training with too much time in front of a screen or thousands of small minute to minute decisions over time with no rest. This contributes to biological duress. When this happens you're not adapting, you're actually degrading performance.
Hat tip: Brain Pickings