Fast Company

Apple Speaks Openly, Discloses Environmental And Rights Issues Among Its Suppliers [Updated]

apple foxconn

The giant consumer technology firm revealed in its "Apple Supplier Responsibility Report" for 2012, available for perusal here, that it had carried out 229 individual audits among its diverse and largely secrecy-shrouded supplier chain. Looking for responsible behavior across all aspects of its business, Apple paid attention to labor and human rights, health and safety, environmental impact and more ephemeral aspects like ethics and business practices. The targeted firms covered the full range from individual component suppliers to assembly firms like Foxconn.

According to Apple itself, the report represents "a level of transparency and independent oversight that is unmatched in our industry," with the independent aspect coming from plans to let the Fair Labor Association carry out its own similar audits. Summarizing its audit, and actually admitting to slight errors and inadequacies in earlier audits, the company notes: "We continue to expand our program to reach deeper into our supply base, and this year we also added more detailed and specialized audits to address safety and environmental concerns. We know that finding and correcting problems is not enough. Apple-designed training programs educate workers about local laws, their fundamental rights as workers, occupational health and safety, and Apple’s Supplier Code of Conduct. Today there are more than one million people who know their rights because they went to work for an Apple supplier."

This position is interesting, given the recent eye-grabbing headlines coming from Foxconn--which is one of its biggest suppliers. Over a hundred workers in a Foxconn plant in Wuhan, China, had threatened mass suicide because their company had moved them ad-hoc to a different production line, with a potentially dangerous lack of training and imbalanced pay conditions. Though the situation has now been resolved, reportedly with the resignation of many of the workers involved in the scandal, it's a black PR mark for Foxconn and thus its prestigious overseas clients of which Apple is the best known. Foxconn had previously been embroiled in a different suicide scandal, which though potentially overblown by a sensation-seeking press, did speak to non-ideal working conditions in Foxconn factories--with stress to deliver to Apple as the cause. 

A small number of explosions in Foxconn facilities is another bad episode in its recent history, with the blame laid on inadequate dust extraction in machining facilities causing dust explosions, fatalities and injuries, and terrible headlines. Apple has also faced criticism from global groups like Greenpeace about its allegedly poor environmental footprint, largely stemming from dangerous practices among its supply chain companies.

Among these issues, Apple also disclosed that some suppliers, mainly at individual component level (a lower margin business than product assembly) were operating with child laborers--an amazingly frank admission although Apple explained that the hirings may be unintentional, in line with ad hoc hiring practices. Following its own strict policies, the firm will push for radical changes in infringing firms. Apple notes it requires "suppliers to return underage workers to school and finance their education through our Child Labor Remediation program" with free education and continued payments.

As part of its audit trail, Apple has also revealed in full its extensive list of suppliers for the year 2011. Though there will be modifications to this list for 2012, it's also an unusually open move by Apple. Speculation on these moves would naturally lead to the fact that, with the death of Steve Jobs, Tim Cook is now CEO and his expertise over the years has actually been in perfecting Apple's supply chain so it can command in the markets it now leads in.

Update: Tim Cook's internal email to staff concerning the report has been revealed via French site MacGeneration.com. A full English version is accessible there, but the letter follows more or less the same thread as the introduction to the report itself. Cook concludes "No one in our industry is driving improvements for workers the way Apple is today. I encourage you to take some time to read more about these efforts, so that you can be as proud of Apple's contributions in this area as I am." 

[Image: Flickr user mwiththeat ]

Chat about this news with Kit Eaton on Twitter and Fast Company, too.

Add New Comment

3 Comments

  • CoResponsiblity

    a small number of explosions... that killed several workers in Chengdu and injured more then 50 in Shanghai.

    It is not just that Apple faces issues the entire industry faces (child labor and payment wages), it is that they are singularly unique in the size and scale of failures that occur on their lines/ buildings specifically.

    It is why when Apple says they "do more than anyone else", one needs to be careful.  the fact is that others (Nokia, Dell, HP) have invested into their China supply chains at a far higher rate, and while they certainly face some of the same problem (Foxconn working conditions), their factories are not blowing up.

    R
    @chinacsr:twitter

  • Mark

    Nothing is mentioned in Apple's report about Chinese workers' exposure to n-hexane, a powerful neurotoxin, which some factories have been reported to require the use of as a screen cleaner. If you're interested to learn more about this and other working conditions in Apple supplier factories in China, you'll want to check out the recent episode of This American Life titled "Mr. Daisey and the Apple Factory." 

  • citizen2000

    The dust explosions at Apple supplier, foxconn has an
    interesting connection to the University
    of Michigan. In the
    1990's Chinese scientists came to UM to study with an expert in industrial
    explosions like those that happened at Foxconn but when they returned to China
    these scientists went to work on weapons for the Chinese military rather than
    on improving safety. This has been a problem with these "dual use"
    technologies that our universities give freely 
    to China,
    they often go to building up their military instead of to improving the lives
    of their citizens. Read more at www.china-threat.com