Click here to preview the new Fast Company

Want to try out the new

If you’d like to return to the previous design, click the yellow button on the lower left corner.

Tangled, Too: Why A Wireless World Will Never Exist

Forget Wi-Fi, forget Bluetooth, forget NFC and even wireless charging—that rat's nest of wires behind your computer desk is going nowhere fast. No matter what a recent Apple patent portends.


Apple recently filed a patent, as the hardware giant often loves to do for defensive or real-tech purposes, that tries to simplify some of the wires threading to and from your iPod, iPhone, Mac and wall-wart charger. It's clever, and it will add to other efforts like Thunderbolt to simplify—and empower—the wires that connect our gear together. But this is also proof positive that despite a plethora of radio-based wireless innovations, the humble (irritating, coiling, roller-chair-snagging, cat-tempting) copper wires we all love and hate are here for ages to come.

patentApple's patent starts with a simple idea: When your iPhone and Mac are on a desk, odds are one or both will be plugged into a wall charger, and you may well have your iPod cable hanging from your Mac's USB socket too—so why not just marry up these cables, and reduce the number of wires as well as items plugged in? The innovation: the same cable charging your Mac will also share data down to the wall wart, which has another socket on it for your iPhone. It'll reduce your cable count slightly, as well as simplify the tangle on your desk and the number of wires you need to slot into your bag. But it's still wired.

Likewise Apple and Intel's innovation with Thunderbolt. The plan is to dramatically change how you connect peripherals—adding fantastical data speeds and allowing simple connections like wiring your laptop to a monitor, then daisy-chaining another monitor off that, and then an external hard drive off this second screen. Thunderbolt may be a plan to take over every wire on your desk, and (when hardware manufacturers get up to speed and drop the price of the cabling) it'll definitely simplify things. But it's still wired. In the future Intel's teased a super-high-speed variant which'll transmit data at still faster rates over a fiber optic, and power over traditional copper wire. But it's still also based on wiring—a long cable that thrums with data and power, but which still has to be plugged into something at both ends.

Alongside these innovations is USB 3.0. If Thunderbolt only ever appeals to a minority (which would be a shame, because like the earlier, similar, but now mainly obsoleted FireWire tech, it's superior to its peers) then there's still USB 3.0 to think about. It too offers fantastic speeds, but not the smart daisy-chaining capabilities of Thunderbolt, meaning your cabling to your USB hub wired to printers, drives, and USB mug warmer will still be roughly the same. Wired. Tangly.

Apple's tried earlier innovations to get around some of the tangle, including its wildly successful MagSafe connector that just lightly yanks out of its socket, undamaged, if you happen to trip over the trailing cable that's powering your Mac. But while innovative, you can't dodge the fact this is still a wire. And for the time being at least, Apple seems closely wedded to its iPod connector protocol—shunning initiatives to adopt a microUSB connector as a standard for phones and other portable gizmos—simply because it's familiar, it just works, there's a host of compatible peripherals out there, and the 30-pins of the format allow much deeper interaction between the inner hardware and whatever you plug into it.

Wireless updates and syncs may well be coming to the iPhone in the next software update, but Apple will still need you to plug the thing in to charge it and connect to iTunes sometimes. Samsung was so impressed with the standard that when it cloned the iPad, it even managed to include a very similar connector into its Galaxy Tab slate PCs.

This situation isn't going to change anytime soon.

You may dream of wireless power—which includes notions of charging your portable devices by remote from a significant distance—but it's a way off. Recently Palm had a lovely notion for wirelessly charging its Pre smartphones, and HP developed the innovation further with wireless data sharing with the TouchPad...but with the demise of that platform, bang went consumer exposure to wire-free smartphones. The problems with wireless power are down to pure physics and engineering—working out how to losslessly share power across an air gap with simple, inexpensive components that don't frazzle the user's skin.

Then there's wireless comms. Yes, your keyboard may be Bluetooth and so may your mouse, and your laptop may sit on your desk for hours sharing a stream of digital ones and zeros to the Net via the magic of your home Wi-Fi. But at some point you have to charge the batteries on your keyboard, or inside your lappy, and you know what string-like object that requires... 

And here's why: Wires just work, they're reliable and they're cheap. Apple's innovation often centers on paring down the components of a device to a form-marries-function pureness, but in a sense this agrees with its continuing use of wires. Simplify how such wiring happens, sure, but "if it ain't broke, (and you don't have something smart, reliable and elegant to replace it with) don't fix it" may as well be Apple's motto. Other suppliers of consumer electronics adhere much less strictly to this sort of design thinking, and they'll just plump for "wires are cheap" and bundle in a bunch of them with every smartphone, computer, and dongle you buy for the next 10 years.

There's also a whole manufacturing engine pumping out cables of every sort, from USB to FireWire to Thunderbolt to proprietary device cables like Apple's and Samsung's. In 2008 alone, it was thought about two billion USB devices were sold—each of which needs a cable, and the figure is bound to have skyrocketed since then, possibly up to 10 billion, which is well over one device for every person alive on the planet, and that's just USB. With the advent of USB 3 and Thunderbolt this installed base isn't going to go away soon, nor are the factories and industries that drive it, and while next-gen products are arriving with wireless solutions, the technology is only now getting to the point it's economical for companies like Canon to put wireless tech into devices like printers...thus shunning the need for a cable.

Sad to say but in an era when we're increasingly bathed in a miasma of radiowaves from our increasingly wireless devices, wires are here to stay.

[Image: Flickr user oskay]

Chat about this news with Kit Eaton on Twitter and Fast Company too.

Add New Comment


  • Chloe LaPointe

    No, wireless charging may not be dead, but it is kind of dumb. I mean, you have to plug the wireless charger into the wall before you can charge your device on it, right? So why not just plug the phone directly into the wall? Why add the extra step? Because it's cool?

  • atimoshenko

    As long as we need a wired connection for charging (and the functional difference here between Apple's MagSafe and Palm's TouchStone isn't that huge), it would make a lot of sense to use the same wire for data transmission too, and only fall back on wireless when the wire isn't available. Thus, we would likely to soon be down to one wire per device, but unlikely to go completely wireless.

  • Dave Baarman

    I must respectively disagree that wireless
    charging is dead.  Just a little research will show that Verizon is
    currently selling six phones with wireless charging capabilities, all which
    meet the global standard for wireless power (Qi) - Samsung Droid Charge, HTC
    Incredible 2, LG Revolution, Motorola Droid 3, Motorola Droid Bionic, HTC
    Thunderbolt, Pantech Breakout, as well as the LG Charging Pad.  That's in
    addition to the proprietary wireless charging systems in the marketplace, and
    after-market sleeves that consumers can buy today. 

    The problem of being
    able to charge devices over small distances while concurrently sending data,
    all without efficiency losses, has already been solved, contrary to what this
    story indicates.  The truth of the matter is that wireless charging is
    here to stay.  Like any new technology, it takes a while for it to become
    mainstream (WiFi got its start in 1985, and Bluetooth has been around since
    1994), but given that standards are in place, and devices are on the market,
    it's only a matter of time until wireless power becomes ubiquitous.