Click here to preview the new Fast Company

Want to try out the new

If you’d like to return to the previous design, click the yellow button on the lower left corner.

The Bacon Uprising: How China's Top-Secret Strategic Pork Reserve Is Burning Down The Amazon

In the latest installment of the Butterfly Effect: The Chinese middle class is eating more and more meat, and Beijing wants to keep prices low. That means finding a way to feed all those pigs with grain imported from land cut from the Brazilian rainforest, leading to conflict within the BRICs.

1. The Strategic Pork Reserve

Since Deng Xiaoping, China’s leaders have been obsessed with "food security" the same way America’s are haunted by not having enough oil. And as Chinese diets become more meat centric, fears of the dangers in the fluctuation of pork prices led China to establish a top-secret "strategic pork reserve" in 2007, the only one of its kind. But maintaining all those pigs has led to a massive dependence on corn and soybean imports for animal feed, which in turn is leading China’s agribusinesses to fan out abroad in a quest to control the means of production. China's attempts to control the means of production in other countries just rising out of developing world is causing tension with its natural allies, and could be just the first step in an ever-escalating series of resource-based conflicts.

In 2006, a fatal outbreak of PRRS (aka porcine blue-ear disease) devastated China’s swineherds, killing millions of pigs. The losses comprised just a tiniest fraction of its total herd of 660 million—more than the next 43 largest producers combined—but even the slight shortfall led to soaring pork prices a year later. Hence, the pork reserve, which would allow Beijing to move quickly to keep its citizens in ribs should there be another interruption in production. 

China’s strategic pork reserve is the direct consequence of an emerging, meat-eating middle class and a government determined to feed them. As the sociologist Mindi Schneider points out, Deng’s economic reforms in the late 1970s privileged industrial farms over small plots to guarantee a steady supply of cheap pork. As a result, the average citizen’s meat consumption has quadrupled since 1980, while pork consumption has doubled in the last two decades. And China’s meat packers are just getting started—only 22% of China’s pork production takes place in industrial feedlots, compared to 97% of America’s. In the future, it will always be the Year of the Pig.

2. Soybeans: They’re Not Just For Tofu Anymore

Until a few years ago, however, the pork on ice was American—60 million pounds purchased from Smithfield Foods. Vowing porcine independence for its meat-eating middle class, in 2009 China began massively scaling up its own pork production, which required turning to other countries for the farmland necessary to feed the pigs.

Once the Politburo decided to feed China with pork, the question then became: What would China’s pigs eat? One answer is corn. Last week, China purchased 540,000 metric tons of U.S. corn for delivery after August, according to the USDA, more than agency’s forecast for the entire year. About 70% of that order is bound for making feedstock, mostly for pork, which last year required 74.5 million tons of corn—up 20% from 2009, according to China’s Agriculture Ministry.

But China’s corn imports—1.5 million tons last year—pale in comparison to its reliance on foreign soybeans. China imported more than 50 million tons of soybeans in 2010, mostly from the U.S. and Brazil, accounting for more than half of the global soy market. They also comprised almost three-quarters of China’s soy consumption, according to Schneider, and were used exclusively for animal feedstock and cooking oil. The USDA expects China’s soybean imports to rise more than 50% by 2020. It hasn’t helped that China actually lost 20 million acres of farmland between 1997 and 2009 due to natural disasters and rapid urbanization. Rather than guaranteeing its food security, China’s hunger for pork has made it utterly dependent on farmers in the Midwest and Minas Gerais instead.

3. Brazilian Bread Basket

The Politburo’s solution was to command state-owned enterprises to "go out" and buy or lease farmland by the millions of acres. Last fall, Heilongjiang Beidahuang Nongken Group—China's largest state-run agricultural conglomerate—agreed to develop almost 500,000 acres of farmland in Argentina, followed by another 200,000 hectares this year. A month later, Chongqing Grains’ announced a $2.5 billion deal to produce soybeans in Brazil.

While much has been written about China’s lopsided deals in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America is a more likely candidate to become the world’s next bread basket. Last fall’s controversial "land grab" report by the World Bank noted that, since 1990, Latin American soybean yields grew at twice the speed of America’s. "Brazil’s soybean technology is world class," says Robert L. Thompson, a professor at the University of Illinois who is a former director of agricultural and rural development at the World Bank. "Soybeans came in as a new crop with no traditions and state of the art technology," including soil remediation techniques capable of converting dry savannah to arable farmland.

"While China is limited to 140 million hectares of agricultural cultivation, Brazil is using 80 million hectares now, has another 200 million hectares of pasture for cattle, and can insert another 140 million hectares into production without encroaching on ecologically protected areas," argues Charles Tang, president of the Brazil-China Chamber of Commerce. His last point is a matter of some contention. While Brazil was able to quadruple its soybean production between 1995 and 2009, it came at the cost of nearly half of the Cerrado, destroying 1 million square kilometers of the richest savannah in the world.

For that reason, among others, Brazilian officials have begun to balk at China’s overtures. Last summer, Brazil’s attorney general reinterpreted a law already on the books making it harder for foreigners to acquire land. "Nothing is preventing investment from happening, but it will be regulated," he promised The New York Times. This has China’s advocates crying foul.

4. Another BRIC in the Wall

Brazil has good reason to be nervous about its burgeoning trade relationship with its fellow BRICs. Nearly all of its exports to China are raw materials—including soybeans, which are crushed on arrival—while nearly all of its imports are cheap manufactured goods, which are crushing its industrial sector. Brazil may be booming, but so is household debt, leading to debates over whether a credit crisis looms. (The resource booms-and-busts of its neighbors Argentina in the 1940s and Uruguay in the 1950s aren’t very reassuring, either).

China’s policies aren’t the problem, retorts Tang; Brazil’s sky-high interest rates and taxes are. But Brazil’s uneasiness and China’s voraciousness raises questions about the future of the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India, China and, as of last year, South Africa) as a political and economic block. On the one hand, the five nations have already held three summits under the BRICs banner, but on the other they spent much of the last meeting in April lobbying China to buy less commodities and more manufactured goods. It’s a bad sign when you suspect your ally of trying to bankrupt you.

"When the G20 was created, that almost guaranteed the BRICs were going to form some kind of cohesive unit," says Ian Bremmer, president of Eurasia Group and author of The End of the Free Market. "Where they may have lots of things they disagree about — soybeans is one of thousand — they all agree they don’t want the developed countries to command this stuff."

While Bremmer predicts the BRICs will unite to defend their mutual interests in tactical matters, he also believes "food and water are going to be the new oil. Resource nationalism, export controls, price controls and all of that is going to create greater inefficiencies in production," perversely spurring the desire to control the means of production. It all seems to be a high price to pay for moo shu pork for all.

Read the previous installment of the Butterfly Effect: The End Of The Shuttle Program Could Mean A Hotel On The Moon, Space Mines, And A Lot Of Pollution

[Images: Top: Flickr user Titanium 22; Middle: Monsanto's Flickr account; Front: khawkins04]

Add New Comment


  • himagain

    What worries me is that nobody seems to notice that WE - the rest of the world - cannot afford China's rapacious growth. Literally. 
    AND nobody is paying attention to the other elephant in the room - India.

    In tiny Australia (by population and arable land) our maniacal government is going to destroy our industrial base in pursuit of the mythical C02 reduction strategy and "lead the world in The Way" , which if the astronomically successful 30% target was reached, would reduce C02 emissions by (point!) 000000007%.

    It is actually the enormous increase in meat consumption that is killing the planet, as this one frightening article demonstrates. The world simply cannot afford to carry the fantastically increasing number of meat eaters any longer.

    Traditionally there were two ways of reducing over-consumption:  a good war or famine. Either one isn't pretty, but today we do have an alternative: controlled growth of consumption. 
    We are going to experience one or more of these options very, very soon.

  • Louann Oravec

    Would this be a way for us to reduce out national debt? Instead of us paying farmers not to grow certain foods; they could grow the soybeans, and corn China needs, get paid for growing them. Then tell China to reduce the debt we own them, using fair USA market value on the crops grown.

  • Memphis Meat Club

    If we are to win the battle that is now going on around the world between freedom and tyranny, the dramatic achievements in pork which occurred in recent weeks should have made clear to us all, as did the Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act of 1985, the impact of this adventure on the minds of men everywhere, who are attempting to make a determination of which road they should take. Since early in the days of the Memphis Meat Club, our efforts in pork have been under review. With the advice of our members, we have examined where we are strong and where we are not, where we may succeed and where we may not. Now it is time to take longer strides—time for a great new American enterprise—time for this nation to take a clearly leading role in pork achievement, which in many ways may hold the key to our future on earth.We possess all the resources and talents necessary. But the facts of the matter are that we have never made the national decisions or marshalled the national resources required for such leadership. We have never specified long-range goals on an urgent time schedule, or managed our resources and our time so as to insure their fulfillment.Recognizing the head start obtained by the Chinese with their large Strategic Pork Reserve, which gives them many years of leadtime, and recognizing the likelihood that they will exploit this lead for some time to come in still more impressive successes, we nevertheless are required to make new efforts on our own. For while we cannot guarantee that we shall one day be first, we can guarantee that any failure to make this effort will make us last. We take an additional risk by making it in full view of the world, but as shown by the feat of every consumer of pork products across this great nation, this very risk enhances our stature when we are successful. But this is not merely a race. Pork is open to us now; and our eagerness to share its meaning is not governed by the efforts of others. We eat pork because whatever mankind must undertake, free men must fully share.Therefore it is our request of the Congress, above and beyond the increases in earlier requestes for pork activities, to provide the funds which are needed to surpass the Chinese Strategic Pork Reserve.

  • Chris Reich

    This is one the best presentations of the world economy I've read. Excellent.

    I fear that if the U.S. does not rebuild its industrial base and resume production of consumer goods, we will continue to face soaring debt and high unemployment.

    I propose we address three urgent matters immediately:
    1) Ethics  We need to teach, value and reward ethical behavior in business and government. Greed has become the primary economic driving force and the damage is nearly beyond repair.
    2) Rebuild our industrial base and encourage people to "buy American". There's a lot at stake with this one. We cannot sustain prosperity as the world's bankers. We must produce goods if only to reduce imports. We need the jobs to raise the tax base or the retiring boomers will live on a Chinese pension.

    3) Repair our broken education system. Our people are so poorly educated that simple problem solving is fast becoming the domain of the few. Thinking was once the core of America's "can do" spirit. Now it's more like "can't someone else do it?" I tire of simple dialogue degenerating to "that's too hard."

    EME   Ethics Manufacturing Education    Fail on any one of these and the other two cannot reach escape velocity from economic decline.

    This is where I fault the current administration and congress. We must get ethics into the talks or whatever plan to salvage the economy is agreed upon will ultimately fail.

    Chris Reich