You can hardly pick up a magazine (or book) these days without seeing an article (or chapter) about how collaboration is a powerful business enabler. In this age of downsizing, outsourcing, and virtual organizations, managers are desperate to optimize the human resources at their disposal, regardless of where they reside. Figuring out what motivates people to cooperate (i.e. collaborate) with peers is a difficult challenge. And so, enterprising writers are eager for angles that can provide insight, myself included. So, I was excited to encounter two unrelated sources this week, that together, provide insight and practical advice about promoting collaboration.
The first was an article published by Yochai Benkler, a professor of Entrepreneurial Legal Studies at Harvard University and a co-director of the Berkman Center for Internet and Sociey at the same institution. The article, which appears in this month's Harvard Business Review, is entitled, "The Unselfish Gene." The title is an intended dig at Richard Dawkins' "The Selfish Gene," which a popular book about evolution. In the article, Benkler refutes Dawkins' contention that people are, at their core, selfish, and are therefore primarily motivated by self-advancement (even to the detriment of others). Benkler points to a new understanding of biological evolution that recognizes 'genetic evidence of a human predisposition to cooperate.' Based on these findings, Benkler recommends that organizations embrace a combination of the following seven mechanisms to encourage human cooperation:
This last point leads me to a meeting I had this week with Sara M. Roberts, president of RobertsGolden Consulting; an organizational consulting group, prior to her keynote address at the Enterprise 2.0 Conference in Boston. On the topic of diverse mechanism for motivating people, Sara identified the following four instruments:
Roberts pointed out that each person is primarily motivated by one particular mechanism. For example, a competitive person would respond well to a project 'game' that would give them the opportunity to score points and outperform their peers. On the other hand, a social person would respond to joining a meaningful project community. Finding the right balance to motivate a diverse group is the trick. Of course, it's not quite that simple. Roberts point to 'organizational readiness' as another key success factor in effecting change and getting these methods to work. But that is a topic for another day ...
If you have a story about how your organization motivates people, I would like to hear about it.
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on LinkedIn