Fearful of Genetically-Modified Crops? You're Too Late

Ethonomic Indicator of the Day: 93% of U.S. soybeans are genetically modified.

Frankenfood! It's the evil-sounding name given to genetically modified crops by organic enthusiasts fearful that altering nature's design will result in irreparable damage to either the environment or our bodies. And there is a good chance that they're right. The fight against GM crops has been intensifying of late, with the USDA approving modified alfalfa early this year, despite protests from big organic (which might be less worried about the potential risks and mostly worried about their organic certification). Because a cow that eats GM alfalfa is no longer organic, no matter how it was raised, and GM alfalfa has the extra ability to spread like kudzu--even to places where it's not supposed to be, like an adjacent field of original-gene alfalfa.

But these fights should not give the impression that we are about to step over a precipice into a world full of GM crops. We did that in 1996. See this chart from the USDA:

That's right. Nearly 100% of all soybeans grown in the U.S. are genetically modified to resist weed-killers that used to also kill the soybeans along with the weeds. And Bt cotton and corn--which have had genes from a soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis jammed inside them to help them resist insects--both comprise about three-quarters of all the acreage of that crop.

The era of the frankenfood is already here. If it turns out to be a devastating problem, it may be already too late. Take a look at your lunch today--corn syrup, anyone?--you've likely ingested some modified strands of corn DNA. How are you feeling? Better question: How will you be feeling in 50 years? 

Follow Fast Company on Twitter. Morgan Clendaniel can be reached by email or on Twitter.

[Top image via the Noun Project]

Add New Comment



    This as simple as any point of commonsense. Anything and everything that we do artificially is only artificial and not natural. Whatever the wealth or virtue of artificial means will have to be perished one day. Science ideally should not hamper the sustainability of environment. The U. S. by its policies and practices is becoming more evil and insane day by day and a and at last it will remain as the cause of the extinct of life on the earth.

  • Andrew Krause

    I think the real ethonomic dimension here is "big organic" spreading disinformation about GM crops. There is absolutely no evidence of nor any rational cause to believe there would be a threat to health or the environment. The human impact is that people who could prosper by farming and get good nutrition are instead living in poverty and dying of starvation because of bad science and FUD.

  • jesse paquette

    "...will result in irreparable damage to either the environment or our bodies. And there is a good chance that they're right."


    At minimum that statement demands a reference. Please try to avoid non-scientific fear-mongering. See: that whole vaccine/autism debacle.