Changing a brand identity can be a risky business: The Gap, The Big Ten, and Starbucks have all had recent logo changes, all of which have garnered some pretty strong, and often negative, responses from consumers. Today, consumers have become more protective about what they consider “their brands,” taking ownership of a product’s brand identity in a way that is different from the past. Consumers who were previously passive users now see themselves as active stakeholders in a brand, so change has to be done quite carefully. Of course, people do want change and the most successful changes in brand identity make sure that change is both purposeful and respectful to the past. If there’s one thing for certain, it’s that change for the sake of change alone, or to make something more current in and of itself, is not the route to success in the world of brand design. The degree of change and the time for change should be flanked by two critical considerations:
ConsistencyWhile it seems contrary to change, consistency is a critical component to successful changes in branding. Marketers sometimes miss that consistency doesn’t come from a logo alone, but rather, it is something that is built and developed through many elements in a brand identity system.
Consistency engenders loyalty and authenticity.With time, consistency also creates a sense of authenticity. It is the design and use of a robust and thoughtful identity system that allows brands to practice consistency across geographies, throughout communications, and within product and service experiences. Consistency generates greater awareness and familiarity; when it is done well it engenders loyalty. With time, consistency also creates a sense of authenticity. But there is a point in time when consistency isn’t enough. It takes a keen marketing team to objectively recognize the precise moment when competitors have adopted category paradigms to the point where everything blends together. This is when one must ask what elements of a brand identity system should change and what elements should remain. The objective behind these questions should not only be about creating differentiation, but more importantly, about maintaining relevance.
Authentic ChangeThe most successful brands use change to signal true change at a company. A new identity says something is new. If it’s the same old product and attitude, change could very well disappoint.
A Process for Communicating ChangeSo you’ve made the decision to change. You’re excited. You’ve done your homework, written the brief, and explored your options. You’re ready to unveil a fresh new identity. How do you make your announcement and make sure that you’re not merely rationalizing the change with “brand speak,” but actually creating a positive impact on your business? Communication of change is critical, because it is human nature to find comfort in the familiar. Over time, I’ve found two critical factors to communicating change with success. They are both about giving people reasons to believe, or “walking the walk” versus merely “talking the talk.”
Internal CommunicationsThe first people to talk to are the people inside. They are people who represent the brand, sell it, support it, and bring it to life.
Too often, insiders are last to know.It’s unfortunate, but there are too many examples of insiders being the last to know when it comes to company news like new branding or new communications. When you engage support from the inside out, you build ambassadors among those most able to help manifest your vision day in and day out with your customers.