Forgetting Facebook: How Tagged.com Found Space in Social Networking

The social network Tagged was founded in the same year as Facebook. When it realized it wouldn't win that fight, it made a bold decision: stop competing. What happened next wasn't always pretty--but lately it's been profitable.

Tagged.com, the social network whose Android app soft-launched last week, was founded in 2004, back when most of us hadn't even heard of a little Harvard startup called Facebook. "We spent three years fighting to be king," recalls Greg Tseng, Tagged's founder and CEO. "By 2007, it became clear that we weren't going to win. So we decided to pivot, to become a site for meeting new people," he explains. "Thank God we did that. The other sites," ones like Hi5 and MySpace, "are getting crushed, are declining, whereas we've built our business over the last three years." Tagged, meanwhile, has over 100 million registered users, and on Monday, announced it had brought in $32 million in revenue last year, its third consecutive profitable year.

The idea behind Tagged is that the Internet should enable you to meet new people, to forge new connections, rather than simply replicating an existing social structure online. "There are literally quadrillions of possible connections, pairs of people," out of the 2 billion people who are online," notes Tseng. "But most aren't viable, won't work, or aren't mutually interesting connections." Tagged uses algorithms to foster interesting connections. It supports three "use cases," in Tseng's terminology: romance, social games, and common interests.

Tagged

This makes Tagged something like three sites at the same time: it's Match.com (for love), Yahoo Games (for play), and Meetup (for common interests), rolled into one. Is Tagged biting off more than it can chew? Tseng doesn't see it that way. He thinks Tagged, if it refines the algorithms for social discovery, can become the platform for other sites.

"Something like Chatroulette should have launched on Tagged," he says. "They had all these problems with relevance, with filtering. Those are things we can power as a platform." With that in mind, in the coming year Tseng wagers the company will likely make at least one acquisition.

One interesting aspect to all this are the unanticipated ways Tagged has grown. Games are popular on Tagged--but not the same sorts of games that are popular on Facebook. Farming games aren't huge on Tagged; rather, the most popular game is one called Pets.

"You can buy, sell, own, and trade other Tagged members as your pets," Tseng explains. "Every action you take involves someone else, often someone you don't know. A common use case is, if you want to get to know someone you'll 'buy' them, or buy their pet away from them." By treating Tagged members themselves as the objects of the game, it forms as a nice ice-breaker.

Also unexpected were some of Tagged's demographic features. It's bigger in the U.S. mountain regions than on the coasts. It's big in Malaysia. It skews African-American ("three to four times over index over the population," says Tseng) as well as Hispanic (two times over index, in that case). "I can't really explain that," says Tseng.

Not everyone loves Tagged, though. Its email promotion practices brought it under fire in recent years. Users who signed up for the site occasionally found themselves inadvertently spamming their entire contacts list. This happened to a Time magazine writer, who thereby dubbed Tagged "the world's most annoying website." In the summer of 2009, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo went after Tagged, saying that the site "raided email address books, stole identities, and spammed millions of Americans." In November of that year, Tagged settled with Cuomo's office, paying a fine of half a million dollars. As recently as February of last year, Tagged was still mopping up after itself.

"Tagged resolved allegations from the AG in an amicable manner," Tagged PR person Peter Evers says. "To avoid issues in the future they instituted a number of new and improved mechanisms to avoid a repeat."

Still, it's a checkered history. Tagged was wise to bow out of the battle against Facebook in 2007, and to redefine what the company was about. But in the wake of its recent wrangles with Cuomo and others, it will need to prove it's wrestled with its own demons if it wants to become the comprehensive social discovery platform Tseng envisions.

Add New Comment

14 Comments

  • Gaw Ernesto

    Social networking has advantage and disadvantage. I don't need to explain everything. Those people involve are specialists in those field. You are the one who knows best in this field of social interactions.

  • Chelsie Crique

    Its a sad fact that the larger an organization becomes, its only as good as the people that run it. Sadly Tagged has gotten so big, many individuals are being stepped on and ignored by them. When calloused deletions occur, you can almost count on being ignored. I've seen many long time Pet players deleted for nothing but promoting the game. They call it spam. They think nothing of deleting active participating players, and do nothing about the deluge of dead pets ( abandoned profiles) or ghosts ( deleted accounts). As a referee in their own game, they provide little voice for the players, while acting more like heartless bullies to many who are guilty of only networking and even promoting Tagged itself with purchases of gold and clicking on their ads. Tell me, does this sound like a company that cares. The game can be addictive when players do find validation from the really high values and interactions you achieve with others. Search functions are limited to only male and female, and dollar values. If you don't want dead pets at the entry levels and beyond, you have no choice but to wade through the thousand of them that litter the results. Tagged has a long way to go in making their own game better, and the many cases I've seen, they are only succeeding in alienating many many people. Does that sound like a company who cares? Most certainly they do not reward loyalty in so many cases, and remain distanced in most others. If it weren't for the few friends that I have made, Tagged would become deleted as another failed and wasted time expense that litters our internet now. Don't even get me started on their " Meet Me " feature. I hope Tagged gets their act together, but we'll see just what they continue to do.

  • ellenram

    The social networking practices in the pets game is great in theory, however when Tagged banishes members for allegedly spamming other members by inviting others to play the game on their "pet's team" the fun goes out of the game. Having been a loyal game enthusiast in the pet's game for the past two years, I am greatly disheartened by the changes regarding "spam" in this aspect. As we try to play the game and network with others playing the same game, we are now called spammer and deleted from Tagged?

  • Adam K

    There is a misplaced quotation mark in paragraph 2: "There are literally quadrillions of possible connections, pairs of people," out of the 2 billion people who are online," notes Tseng. That sentence should only have two quotation marks, not three.

  • Lucb1e

    I can't even register on tagged.com, when I enter my gmail address (something.something@gmail.com), it filters out the dots and sends the mail there :| Never arrives, obviously...