Click here to preview the new Fast Company

Want to try out the new

If you’d like to return to the previous design, click the yellow button on the lower left corner.

Steve Jobs on Google TV, PC's Demise, Theft, Extortion, Sex, and More at D8

<a href=Steve Jobs at D8" width="482" height="321" />

 Steve Jobs lived up to the hype at D8 on Tuesday, forecasting a dim future for PCs and Google TV, offering candid comments on the Gizmodo iPhone incident, and more.

Thrown by All Things D and hosted by the Wall Street Journal's head tech writer, Walt Mossberg, this year's D conference (the eighth, hence "D8") is the first since 2007 in which Jobs has participated. Given the media attention, you'd think Jobs was the only one speaking.

Jobs began by noting that while Apple surpassing Microsoft in market valuation is "surreal," "it doesn't really mean anything." He batted aside the usual questions about Flash, Adobe, and his "Thoughts on Flash" essay, still pushing HTML5 and saying he merely wrote that essay in response to "being trashed by Adobe in the press."

On the subject of PCs, he said they'd taken us a long way, then made a trucks vs. cars analogy, explaining that, before people built metropolises, they drove trucks, because they needed the boxy utility. But now they drive cars. Only one in a certain number of people still need trucks. PCs are the trucks. Macs are cars. You getting this?

One of the most interesting pieces of Apple-related news in the company's history is Apple's feud and possible legal action against Gizmodo over the allegedly stolen iPhone scandal. [Disclosure: I am a former employee of Gizmodo, though I left before the scandal took place, and Fast Company has an ongoing partnership with Gizmodo in which both publications run stories from the other.] Jobs framed the situation by saying "they bought stolen property and tried to extort [Apple]," which makes it pretty clear that Apple will continue to pursue the case through legal means. He also joked about the juiciness of the whole saga. "It's got theft. It's got buying stolen property. It's got extortion. I'm sure there's some sex in there," he said. "Somebody should make a movie out of this."

On the subject of Google TV, Jobs had some interesting words:

The television industry fundamentally has a subsidized business model that gives everyone a set-top box, and that pretty much undermines innovation in the sector. Ask TiVo, ask Roku, ask Google in a few months. The only way this is going to change is if you start from scratch, tear up the box, redesign and get it to the consumer in a way that they want to buy it. But right now, there’s no way to do that….The TV is going to lose until there’s a viable go-to-market strategy.

He explains that this is why he still calls Apple TV a "hobby": television can't fully connect and integrate with the Internet given the cable companies' control of set-top boxes. Google's attempt, remember, takes a new approach by often staying out of sight, but Jobs seems to think that option won't see much more success than Windows Media Center or any of the other attempts at connecting televisions.

Stray observations:

Jobs wants to encourage old-school (read: not blogging) journalism on new media, but seems as frustrated as the rest of us with publications' inability to monetize.

The iPad actually predates the iPhone, in a certain sense—Jobs tasked his engineers with building a tablet, then realized afterwards that the new designs lent themselves to a smartphone. That's been reported before, but it's neat to hear him explain it in full.

He calls Apple "the biggest startup on the planet" due to the collaborative, non-hierarchical upper management structure.

Later in the interview, he returned to the subject of the Gizmodo/iPhone story and said he was advised to let it slide, adding, "You shouldn't go after a journalist just because they bought stolen property and tried to extort you," but said he ultimately felt like the whole thing went against Apple's "core values." He said he'd "rather quit" than let it slide.

He admits to occasionally making mistakes in the App Store approval process—we're all perfectly aware of that, but it's refreshing to hear it from Jobs. Now about rejecting that iFart app for the iPad...

Read more about Steve Jobs at D8

Dan Nosowitz, the author of this post, can be followed on Twitter, corresponded with via email, and stalked in San Francisco (no link for that one—you'll have to do the legwork yourself).

Add New Comment


  • Anand Arumugam

    The headline sounds more tabloid-ish. Sad that FastCompany has to resort such headlines to get people's eyes on this article.

  • Kevin Lenard

    "Why?", indeed, "JB Metrics"!

    Because of the last paragraph in my comment above. Because Apple virtually single-handedly reinvented the music industry. Because the iPod has no competitor. Because Apple virtually single-handedly introduced stylish design to the world of computing devices. Because no other company in the world has risen in market capital the way Apple has, now surpassing Microsoft. Because Apple reinvented tech retail with the Apple Store. Because, after years of low penetration, Mac sales are now starting to rise exponentially. Because, while others were plotting it, Apple single-handedly just launched Web 3.0 and will likely find a way to save professional journalism. Because Apple is poised to reinvent the TV model and will likely get to marketing's Holy Grail, fully addressable advertising, before Facebook and Google (who have both been trying to plan toward it) crack it.

    I'm getting tired of listing the reasons why we all should be hyping, and watching, Jobs and his company, JB. More on Web 3.0 in this post: http://advertisingbusinessmode...

  • Kevin Lenard

    GIven that Apple announced the launch of iPad development with an ad in 1987 (watch the ad in my post here: http://advertisingbusinessmode... ) AND has proven themselves to be so good at keeping a secret (and suing anyone who tries to force their hand), AND has launched what I call "Web 3.0" with the long awaited introduction of the iPad (the device NOT being the big news, but rather the business model behind it, charging for the content we look at on it), we have to assume that the iPad business model is their platform (at least step one) in a VERY far-reaching, long-term strategy to own the future of TV, reinventing it.

    As I, and so many others, have pointed out before, the iPad is just a big iPhone Touch, but the fact that the screen is sufficiently large to enjoy the full movie-watching and article-reading experience makes it the ideal platform to launch Web 3.0: regaining control of charging for content (now a step beyond stage one of killing 'FREE'). This is HUGE. A real business model reinvention step-change -- at a global level.

    Most people haven't even begun to wrap their heads around what Jobs has done. He may beat Google to truly getting a handle on the marketing industry's holy grail. More about that on my blog, for the intellectually curious futurists amongst you.

  • JB Metrics

    96% of the people reading this article are reading it on a non-Apple computer. 98% are reading it from a computer running Adobe Flash Player, <1% are using a browser that supports HTML 5 to read this, and 99.9999% of the readers found this article from either Google or one of the many social networks (not Apple).

    So why is the media giving so much media coverage and hype to Steve Jobs and Apple when they represent third in the smartphone market growth and a seriously distant second in the overall PC market?