Click here to preview the new Fast Company

Want to try out the new

If you’d like to return to the previous design, click the yellow button on the lower left corner.

The iPhone 4 Leak Saga From Start to Finish

iPhone 4

Over the weekend, Gizmodo gained possession of a fourth generation Apple iPhone. This is a monumental scoop for a gadget blog—any news outlet would be thrilled to unveil such a coveted new device before Steve Jobs had a chance to do it himself. And while you're likely to read about this coup in mainstream news outlets across the globe, not many of the news outlets writing about Gizmodo would have allowed themselves to procure the device the way the "world's most fun technology website" did, nor would they have followed up the story in quite the same way. This is the story of how that came to pass—at least to the best of our ability to re-construct it right now. (Disclosure: I used to work for Gizmodo until a few months ago, and Fast Company often syndicates Gizmodo articles as part of an ongoing partnership.)

On March 18th, an Apple software engineer named Gray Powell went to a bar called Gourmet Haus Staudt in Redwood City, California. He was carrying a fourth generation iPhone with him, disguised in a case that made it look like a current-gen iPhone 3GS. Powell sent an update to his Facebook profile saying how much he liked the beer (unrelated, but funny: a Facebook fan page has sprung up around his story), and updated his Twitter a few times—he was out celebrating his birthday, it turns out. And then he left the Haus, accidentally leaving his iPhone behind. The phone was first picked up by another patron of the bar, and then handed off to an as-yet unnamed person who would end up selling it to Gizmodo. We're taking Gizmodo's word here that the iPhone prototype was not intentionally stolen from Powell, but picked up with innocent intentions.

The new owner thought it was a regular iPhone 3GS. He turned it on long enough to figure out that it belonged to Powell, thanks to the update left on the phone's Facebook app. By the next morning, the iPhone had been remotely disabled.

Then about three weeks pass. It's unclear why so much time elapsed before the news leaked. The iPhone's new owner figured out that it was no normal iPhone 3GS shortly after it was bricked. Gizmodo claims that the new owner attempted to return the device to Apple, but no one from the company paid heed. In a followup, Gizmodo's John Herrman explains why the phone was unable to make its way back to Apple—the new owner called Apple customer service, but due to Apple's vaunted secrecy, the customer service agents knew nothing of the phone and assumed, reasonably enough, that it was a Chinese knockoff. It's a once-in-a-lifetime story, after all; who would believe that a next-gen iPhone was found on the floor of a German bar in Redwood City?

Apple itself was unable to track the phone down. The company remotely disabled the device the very night it was lost, which meant they could not call or text the phone to ask for it back. Even worse, Apple couldn't track the phone using GPS, since the Find My iPhone feature just happens to not work in the current beta of iPhone OS 4.0. So this unnamed new owner was left with a next-gen iPhone prototype and no way to return it. What's a guy in that position to do?

He began shopping the device around for $10,000—this was according to Gizmodo's arch-rival Engadget, who later redacted this bit of reporting from their original story for reasons that are still unexplained. Engadget's original $10,000 claim is confirmed by this Dave Zatz blog post.

There may have been some kind of bidding war between the two blogs, whether for the device itself or photos of the device. And in the end, Gizmodo secured the phone for $5,000 plus a bonus scheme based on the traffic to the post. Gizmodo's Jason Chen confirmed the $5,000 figure to Bloomberg, and Nick Denton, who runs Gizmodo's parent company, Gawker Media, similarly confirmed that figure to the New York Times. (The best explanation of Gizmodo's unique brand of checkbook journalism can be found in this Peter Kafka story from last October.) It's possible Engadget dropped out of the race, although it's also possible they paid for the photos that they ended up publishing.

By the time Engadget published the first pictures of the iPhone 4 this past Saturday, April 17th, Gizmodo already had the device in hand. They'd had it for a few days by then. And, as far as I can tell, nobody at Engadget had actually seen or held the phone. The photos that ran on Engadget are so-so, certainly not up to top-tier tech blog standards. And Engadget's story was filled with skepticism, even in the headline ("iPhone 4G: Is This It?"). After all, these blogs receive countless fake images, mockups, and rumors about Apple products. And Apple is known for running an air-tight operation and hunting down leaks with ferocity. It's easier to doubt out loud than verify the leak.

Then on the morning of the 20th, Gizmodo's Jason Chen published a hands-on with the headline: "This Is Apple's Next iPhone." He went on to detail why he believed the device was a legitimate Apple product. It was convincing enough that Apple insider Jon Gruber voiced his opinion that the leak was legit. And Engadget later revised their Saturday post to reflect a less skeptical outlook.

Twitter, Facebook, and news outlets of all sorts ran wild with the story. The focus was thrown back on Gizmodo: How did they get this new iPhone? Many voiced concern that Gizmodo was guilty of receiving stolen property. The story got the attention of Apple dictator Steve Jobs, who, according to The Awl, called up Gizmodo's editorial director Brian Lam to chat about the leak.

This was a moment of sweet revenge for Gizmodo. Just last month, Apple had delivered a last minute surprise to the gadget hounds there by withholding an early review version of the iPad that had been promised to them. While plenty of other mainstream reviewers and even lesser-known bloggers received early review units of the tablet computer, Gizmodo was left scrambling to cover the launch of the new product.

Nick Denton promised a story of the leak would publish later that night, and that it would be a real "corker" (blimey!). That evening, Gizmodo did indeed post a story outing Gray Powell as the engineer who left the iPhone at the beer garden, showing a photo of him and linking to his Flickr page (the story didn't mention the checkbook journalism).

Many of Gizmodo's commenters, and other tech writers, are outraged at the way Gizmodo treated Powell. After all, it was only last July when another young man in charge of fourth-generation iPhone prototypes for Apple's Taiwanese manufacture Foxconn, lost one of the units. He later committed suicide.

Powell seems to be faring better. But why not merely use his initials? Does his name and picture really add to this story? One emblematic Gizmodo commenter wrote about the post, "It was unnecessary, unjustified and I hope this Gray Powell dude finds some way to tear Giz a new one for such cheap, pathetic behaviour." In response to the anger, Gizmodo editorial director Brian Lam posted a short note to Powell imploring him to "keep his head up"—not exactly the apology most were looking for.

Later that same night, Gizmodo posted an official letter from an Apple Lawyer, requesting that the device be returned. That's explicit confirmation that it is indeed an iPhone prototype, though of course nobody knows how similar it will be to the final version of the fourth generation phone which is expected to be introduced in June.

In his response, Lam continued the amiable yet unapologetic tone toward Powell, saying "I hope you take it easy on the kid who lost it." He also agreed to give back the phone—after all, Gizmodo had gotten more than they needed out of it. The phone was remotely disabled, anyway, so they couldn't get past a "USB Connected" screen.

That's the story so far. We may in time find out who the seller was. But even if that person's name does surface, it's unclear that he did anything wrong.

What is important is that within one day, a "Hitler video" riff on the situation debuted. The original Gizmodo post has been viewed millions of times over and is on its way to becoming the most popular story in Gizmodo's history. And the debates over checkbook journalism, media ethics, and the competition between mainstream news outlets and Web upstarts will continue long after the iPhone 4 story is nothing but Wayback Machine lore.

Update, April 26th: Gizmodo revealed today that on April 23rd, California police raided the home of Gizmodo editor Jason Chen (while he wasn't even home, leading police to "bash in" his front door) and seized some of his equipment, including four computers and two servers. Gawker Media is claiming the search and seizure violated reporter privilege, and is demanding the return of the equipment. Read more about this development in our full story here. Or Choose Your Own Adventure through the saga.

Add New Comment


  • Joakim Skog

    Let's hope Steve offers free German beer at the launch of iPhone 4, and that Mr Powell will get to unveil the real deal on stage.

  • Alan Graham

    Re: Greg Easter

    "Does anybody else think this could smell of a "PR" stunt.. not apples style but it sure got a lot of "free" press"

    Yes because we all know the one thing Apple desperately needs is free press. Everyone who says this is some PR stunt is not paying attention to how Apple does anything. They likely do controlled leaks to people in the media, but that's a big step from leaving a prototype somewhere, where it likely could just be "returned." And in fact Apple is currently being very quiet on the whole thing...and that is likely due to considering legal issues and next steps. Apple's silence is more indicative of planning how they are going to handle this.

    Let's keep something in perspective. Other than the probable occasional leaks of tidbits...they don't release actual product until there is a ship date. When you are the leader of an industry that continues to copy everything you it too much for Apple to be so secret? It isn't like MS or other companies who plan new products and show prototypes that never materialize...or eventually disappoint.

    I really don't understand the anger directed at a company that tries to control its "media" because all companies do this...that's why all companies pay for PR spin and control their image. Apple is not unique to giving exclusives or dissing one media outlet over another...I've been a tech writer for 10+ years and I've seen this happen many times..and it is no different than how news works in general.

    As for the phone being off campus...if it is a prototype it has to be tested in the real world. You can't just test a product "inside" the company. It has to be where regular people go.

    Also keep in mind if this were any other company...or even someone like Nick Denton at Gawker himself losing a phone...and someone took said phone...and sold it to a competing media outlet which then published personal and business info about them...they'd be all up in arms about privacy. thing people haven't noticed...guess who runs Gawker's/Giz's ad network for mobile sites? Quattro Wireless...and who now owns Quattro? Apple. That should be interesting.

  • Slade Sundar

    "We may in time find out who the seller was. But even if that person's name does surface, it's unclear that he did anything wrong."

    Whoever he/she was CLEARLY did something wrong. They sold a stolen phone. The article says that the phone was bricked by the next morning. If this person had turned on the phone, and saw Gray Powell's facebook page and status, he could have easily sent a message to Gray from "Gray" from his own phone that instant. He could have also searched for Gray Powell even after the phone was bricked - once you know someone's name its fairly easy to find them. Lastly, if you find someone else's item at an establishment, you LEAVE IT with the management of the establishment - chances are that person is going to come back for it.

    I once lost my phone at a restaurant, it slipped out of my pocket and was on the seat of the booth that I was in. I called the restaurant the next day from work, and they said someone had turned it in, and they had kept it in their safe. My personal crisis averted thanks to a good citizen.

    Whoever this person was that "found" the phone never truly intended to give it back or re-unite it with the owner.

  • Mr. Lucas Brice

    The guy who found the phone and didn't return it committed theft. When he sold it, he was selling stolen merchandise. When Gizmodo bought it, they were (allegedly) receiving stolen merchandise. What am I missing here?

  • Hayden Flintoft

    Your all assuming that its Apples PR stunt. have we forgotten about the other party in this. How much attention is this story giving them?

  • Katie Warren

    Hey Dan, tried to message you this, but there are a number of inaccuracies in your article:

    1. That isn't HIS Facebook profile, it's a fan page created by someone else to make fun of Powell

    2. Giz says that they had the phone a week before going public with it, not that they acquired it this weekend

    3. You state that Jason Chen published his hands-on on April 20th. He did not; it was April 19th

    4. The phone did not display a "USB Connected" screen, it displayed a traditional screen that all iPhones wiped of data do: "Connect to iTunes". This was originally a key in confirming that the device was from Apple and not a cheap Japanese or Chinese knockoffs

    Just want to make the article clearer

  • Gregory Ferenstein

    To all of you who think it may be a "PR stunt." Interesting theory, but does apple really need things like this to get press? How would it outweigh the harm from conducting such a stunt?


  • Pat Donlin

    I hope for Mr. Powell's sake that the scenario went like this: "Hey Steve, I'll bet you a round of beers that I can get us a bunch of free ink with one of those reject prototypes from our development guys." "OK, Gray, it's a bet."

  • David McCrindle

    I agree it was uncalled for of Gizmodo to call the individual out. So why add fuel to the fire by naming him once again and reposting his photo?

  • Dean Rodgers

    I'd be shocked if it was a PR stunt. Why would they hang an employee out to dry and make themselves look a little stupid when they will get the same amount of coverage via a traditional launch. Apple is beyond bush league tactics of this nature.

  • Angela Evans

    I agree this has the stench of a PR stunt. I can't believe that theory isn't mentioned in this article. Kudos to Apple for doing something unexpected, but they should have taken a little more effort to make it less obvious.

  • Greg Easter

    Does anybody else think this could smell of a "PR" stunt.. not apples style but it sure got a lot of "free" press

  • Hayden Flintoft

    Your all assuming that its Apples PR stunt. have we forgotten about the other party in this. How much attention is this story giving them?