Fast Company

Apple Introduces iAd: All iPhone 4.0 Roads Lead to Advertising

Apple iAd

The last "tent pole" in the presentation by Steve Jobs and Co. unveiled during the iPhone OS 4 presentation in Cupertino, Calif., on Thursday was the most important. All of those shiny new iPhone functions -- the multitasking, the folders, unified e-mail, iBooks, Game Center -- will satisfy lots of user desires. But make no mistake: It's all about iAd.

iAd is Apple's long-awaited play in mobile advertising, the one running in the background of all it's done recently. And it's distinctly Apple-flavored. Just like Google's strategy is based on its strength--search--Apple's iAd is based on its bailiwick, apps. All of these ads will be in-app, and they're a far cry from the typical banner ads Steve Jobs just decried as "boring." The new ads will be based on HTML5 (in yo face, Adobe!), and will be interactive, "emotional," and built right into iPhone 4.0--where Apple controls every part of the ad.

You might see, as per Jobs's demo, a banner ad for Toy Story 3 while in an entertainment app, or Nike while in a shopping app. In the past, clicking on that ad was kind of a pain--it'd kick you out of whatever you were doing, vault you to the browsers, and you'd have to exit that, head back to the home screen, and restart your previous app just to get back to what you were doing. These new banner ads, when clicked, will keep you in your app--they'll take full-screen, and look more like an app-within-an-app than just an image and link. You can watch videos, play mini-games, whatever, and when you're finished, click the X in the upper left corner and the ad will disappear, leaving you where you started with no fuss.

That sounds simple, but it wouldn't have been possible before the iPhone added multitasking. After all, running an HTML5-based ad and an app at the same time really is multitasking. And it's the new kind of iPhone multitasking as well--instead of truly running your app in the background, the OS simply freezes it in time, so when you get back to it, it's just how you left it. That's tailor-made for these sorts of ads--essentially it pauses your app, presents you with an ad, and then unpauses the app when you're finished.

The other elements of multitasking are also ready-made for advertising. Wonder why Apple only allowed a few elements of apps to run in the background, and how they chose those in particular? They're all ad-based! Constant GPS can tell an advertiser where you are, so they can offer location-based ads, coupons, or deals. Imagine going to the market. Your phone becomes aware of your location and pushes your grocery list to you just as the store lets you know there's a sale on Spaghetti-O's on isle six.

Push notification lets an advertiser interrupt you to let you know about ads. Advertising is the Svengali behind iPhone 4.0.

In terms of the actual advertisers, Apple is actually going to sell and host the ads themselves, likely with the help of the recently acquired Quattro Wireless, and will take 40% of ad revenue. That means they'll have lots of control over which ads go where--and can even impose an approval process on advertising similar to the one they have for the App Store.

"I think there will need to be some boundaries," Jobs said during Thursday's Q&A session. "Like, you can't run just any ad on ABC. There are some ads you can't run. But these advertisers are paying to run ads... I'm hoping there won't be anything other than a light touch.... We do not have plans to be a worldwide ad agency. We don't know a lot about advertising, but we're learning."

And then in a remarkably frank statement that conjures those images of Jobs and Google's Eric Schmidt sharing a chat and a cuppa joe recently (like the sheep dog and coyote off the clock), he added, "We tried to buy AdMob, but Google snatched them up, because they didn't want us to have them, so we bought another smaller company, Quattro. But we're babes in the woods."

Will this spark a new golden age of advertising--not quite Mad Men but something more like App Men? (After all, it'll be much more expensive to make an interactive HTML5 ad than a banner ad).

"The ad agencies we’ve talked to, like our own, have been super excited about this," Jobs said. "For the first time, they’re seeing how to bring their storytelling skills to digital ads. They’re really excited about hiring technical people to create these kinds of ads to combine them with their storytelling."

We already know Google's not too excited about this. Apple's making a strong stand to not just revolutionize mobile advertising but own it. On one hand, it'll surely bolster Google's argument against an FTC block of their AdMob deal. But then, of course, they'll actually have to compete with iAd.

Add New Comment

3 Comments

  • Turtle King

    Apple still has a outdated business model, where they need to control everything. Even though they are trend setters and the first to a new type of market doesn't mean they end up the most successful. example is Microsoft, they set up a much more profitable business model where they just sell licensing of the operating system, as apposed to selling the computer and the operating system as a whole. when you have a company controlling all of this media content and advertising for its product it creates a closed system that other businesses either cant do business with or would not like to do business with, apple that is, because no one likes a company that thinks it is its right to call all the shots. now when one looks at Google in the mobile advertising market you see Google just lets app creators put whatever on their app market. letting them choose the free and with advertising business model or the buy model, and guess what, the most successful are those with ads. and the ads can come from anywhere not just Apple or Google but the app maker can go directly to the source or use ad widgets from company like Google this offers up much more free market space, not on that is like the Apple centric point of view.

  • editor mobiThinking

    To what extent is Apple interested in advertising on platforms other than its own? While the Apple platforms are much hyped, they are still a pretty small part of the mobile device market. And this announcement seems to just focus on downloadable applications. That doesn't really sound like Apple wants to 'own' mobile advertising.
    This is a shame as the ad network, Apple purchased, with this in mind, Quattro Wireless had built up a good network of premium mobile publishers that served ads to all mobile devices – and was beginning to get traction among brand advertisers.
    As Google with AdMob (assuming the acquisition is allowed to go ahead – that's another story) is focused on the entire market i.e. all mobile devices that access the mobile Web. Google is interested in mobile Websites as well as smartphone applications (which is still quite niche), so it really shouldn't be that bothered by iAd.
    Google will of course cite Apple's announcement as sign of further competition in the mobile space, but the two of them are but two of a dozen mobile ad networks operating in the US.
    If you want to know more about Quattro, AdMob or any of the other leading mobile ad networks, please see this guide: http://mobithinking.com/mobile...

  • editor mobiThinking

    To what extent is Apple interested in advertising on platforms other than its own? While the Apple platforms are much hyped, they are still a pretty small part of the mobile device market. And this announcement seems to just focus on downloadable applications. That doesn't really sound like Apple wants to 'own' mobile advertising.
    This is a shame as the ad network, Apple purchased, with this in mind, Quattro Wireless had built up a good network of premium mobile publishers that served ads to all mobile devices – and was beginning to get traction among brand advertisers.
    As Google with AdMob (assuming the acquisition is allowed to go ahead – that's another story) is focused on the entire market i.e. all mobile devices that access the mobile Web. Google is interested in mobile Websites as well as smartphone applications (which is still quite niche), so it really shouldn't be that bothered by iAd.
    Google will of course cite Apple's announcement as sign of further competition in the mobile space, but the two of them are but two of a dozen mobile ad networks operating in the US.
    If you want to know more about Quattro, AdMob or any of the other leading mobile ad networks, please see this guide: http://mobithinking.com/mobile...