
Major publications like The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, USA Today, and Chicago Sun-Times all got Apple iPad review units--but so did odder pubs like BoingBoing.com and PCMag. I read through them all so you don't have to--and here's what I learned that I didn't know before.
And the takeaway, from each review:
The New York Times: "And the techies are right about another thing: The iPad is not a laptop. It's not nearly as good for creating stuff. On the other hand, it's infinitely more convenient for consuming it -- books, music, video, photos, Web, e-mail and so on. For most people, manipulating these digital materials directly by touching them is a completely new experience -- and a deeply satisfying one."
Wall Street Journal: "If people see the iPad mainly as an extra device to carry around, it will likely have limited appeal. If, however, they see it as a way to replace heavier, bulkier computers much of the time—for Web surfing, email, social-networking, video- and photo-viewing, gaming, music and even some light content creation--it could be a game changer the way Apple's iPhone has been."
USA Today: "Apple has pretty much nailed it with this first iPad, though there's certainly room for improvement. Nearly three years after making a splash with the iPhone, Apple has delivered another impressive product that largely lives up to the hype."
Boing Boing: "Maybe the most exciting thing about iPad is the apps that aren't here yet. [...] I like it a lot. But it's the things I never knew it made possible -- to be revealed or not in the coming months — that will determine whether I love it."
PCMag: "There may be things it doesn't do, but what it does do, it does remarkably well. Aside from the aforementioned limitations, there isn't a lot else to gripe about. And to my great surprise, you can actually get real work done with the iPad."