Fast Company

Green Groups Capture Hollywood's Attention With Avatar Sands Ad

Avatar

One of the reasons why Avatar has been such a success (besides the mind-numbingly beautiful scenery) is that it has a simple story. The David versus Goliath plot can--and has already been--applied to situations around the world by activist groups eager to hitch their wagon to the blockbuster film. But the latest campaign by environmental groups including the Sierra Club, Greenpeace, and Earthworks might be the most effective. The organizations have teamed up to purchase a full-page ad in the Oscar edition of Variety comparing the battle between Pandorans and the Sky People to the destruction of the Boreal forest to make way for oil extraction in the Canadian Tar Sands.

Sierra Club Canada elaborated on the ad in a press release:

The ad shows a 797B Heavy Hauler, one of the first trucks used to mine the Tar Sands, which is identical to some of the trucks used in Avatar . It also shows the vast open pit mines and tailings ponds that cut across what was once pristine Boreal forest--the same forest that stretched across Cameron's hometown in Ontario. "We want Hollywood, and the powerful thought leaders there, to know Avatar does a great job of exposing the Tar Sands," said Dr. Rick Smith, Executive Director of Environmental Defence Canada, one of 55 groups that signed the ad. "It's the world's most destructive project -- Pandora's unobtanium is Canada's Tar Sands."

Cameron probably didn't have the Boreal forest in mind when he thought up the plot to Avatar. But it's still a smart move on the part of anti-Tar Sand activists to make such a splashy statement in Variety. One sign that it's working: The ad has already managed to upset oil producers. The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers has quickly lashed back with a press release of its own.

[Via Sierra Club]

Add New Comment

4 Comments

  • John kj

    We need to keep our environment free from pollution and the like.. but is there an alternative source of energy? As we don't have the answer to that question, we have to put up with oil producers and the pollution it generates.
    --
    Rrod

  • Whys Alives

    Roberto, name it. As I said, wind and solar are not fully up to the challenge. Perhaps you are referring to the Bloom box? It still requires a source of more traditional energy to function. All the clean energy alternatives are only supplements. None have proven the ability to serve core energy requirements. 40% of U.S. energy still comes from coal and we don't burn it just because it smells good.

  • Whys Alives

    Nothing is for free; we have to make choices. What would you rather than tar sand? Coal? Oil? Nuclear? Pick one because your computer and the internet and our entire economy runs on energy and that energy has to come from somewhere. Wind and solar can be helpful, but are not completely up to the challenge. So I say again... pick one.