Click here to preview the new Fast Company

Want to try out the new

If you’d like to return to the previous design, click the yellow button on the lower left corner.

Is The New MacBook Green? Ask Greenpeace.

We know the drill by now: every few months Apple rolls out some new iPod model, seducing us to trash our still-shiny-perfectly-brand-new one. We tend to think of this as progressive design. However, these days progressive design must also factor in a product's environmental spillover. Apple—and its exponentially rapid product rollouts—has been one of the worst offenders.

Yesterday Greenpeace unveiled its latest Guide to Greener Electronics.

With e-waste reportedly accounting for 70% of all toxic waste in the U.S., this is an aggressive effort to breathe down the necks of the companies, like Apple, who are guilty contributors to the problem. According to Greenpeacet, tech companies ranking as most eco-friendly include Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Toshiba and Samsung. Disappointingly, the worst offenders when it comes to toxicity, recycling, and energy, include many of the companies we tend to consider the most innovative: HP, Microsoft, Nintendo (ranked last)...and our friends at Apple.

This report comes on the heels of Apple's latest TV campaign for its new MacBook Green (and of course: the subsequent TV parody).

According to Apple, the newest version of its digital silver bling is 100% recyclable, runs on a quarter of the power of a single light bulb, and is made without mercury. While the company gets points for reducing toxicity and increasing recycled materials, the greenwash brigade already has their guns blazing. deemed the MacBook's solid aluminum brick construction an environmental "step backwards." For a detailed critique of the new MacBook's greeniness, check out Green, Inc.

None of this is easy, or clear cut. A few weeks ago 60 Minutes ran a terrifying expose on where America's "recycled" electronics end up, and earlier this week The New York Times uncovered the tin wars over laptops in the Congo. However, the more organizations like Greenpeace can pull back the curtain, the more consumers like us should apply pressure to brands by choosing where we spend our dollars.

Add New Comment


  • Jame Chang

    I think this article really brings up a good point in that what companies are marketing in their advertisements should be taking with a grain of salt and investigate to see if they complete truths. Unfortunately many people are easily swayed by the messages in advertisements, and that is why they are so effective. Because companies will typically never mention a product's faults, I think people should be more proactive in putting in the research into an issue/product they care about to find out if a company is being unethical and making false claims or telling half truths. I was definitely surprised that some of the most innovative and successful companies out there didn't fare so well in producing green electronics.